Background: Many Western countries have reported declines in adolescent alcohol use. This study examined changes in adolescent alcohol use in New Zealand between 2007 and 2012 and explored variations across sociodemographic strata. Methods: Data from 2 nationally representative, cross-sectional high school surveys conducted in 2007 (n = 7709) and 2012 (n = 7266) were examined. Changes in the prevalence of drinking in the past 4 weeks were examined among the total sample, as well as the frequency of drinking in the past 4 weeks and typical drinking-occasion quantity among drinkers. Only students residing in urban areas were included. Variation in changes was investigated across 4 demographic groups characterized by age (<16 years, ≥16 years) and sex. Interactions with household- and neighborhood-level socioeconomic position (SEP) identified any differential changes between socioeconomic strata. Results: From 2007 to 2012, significantly fewer students consumed alcohol in the past 4 weeks. Interaction analyses demonstrated that, among young females (<16 years), declines were significantly greater among those of high household SEP when compared with those of low household SEP. Among drinkers, reductions in the frequency of drinking were found among all demographic groups and SEP strata. Interaction analyses revealed that only young males (<16 years) showed significantly reduced typical drinking-occasion quantities. Among young females, significant interactions revealed a shift towards increasing typical drinking-occasion quantities among those of low household and neighborhood SEP, whereas their more advantaged counterparts showed no significant change over time. Conclusions: Fewer drinking occasions characterized the major declines in adolescent drinking between 2007 and 2012. Whereas young males showed reductions in the typical quantity consumed, young females of low household and neighborhood SEP progressed towards higher typical quantities. To address the uneven distribution of alcohol-related harm and improve the targeting of harm reduction initiatives, it remains imperative to examine changes in both the overall shift and shape of the distribution curve.
MeashamF. The turning tides of intoxication: young people's drinking in Britain in the 2000s. Health Educ.2008;108:207–222.
2.
LintonenT, KarlssonT, NevalainenJ, KonuA. Alcohol policy changes and trends in adolescent drinking in Finland from 1981 to 2011. Alcohol Alcohol.2013;48:620–626.
3.
HuckleT, PledgerM, CasswellS. Increases in typical quantities consumed and alcohol-related problems during a decade of liberalizing alcohol policy. J Stud Alcohol Drugs.2012;73:53–62.
4.
PayneC, PhelpsA. Drinking alcohol. In: FullerE, ed. Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use Among Young People in England in 2012. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2013:75–144.
5.
HibellB, GuttormssonU, AhlstromS, . The 2011 EPSAD Report: Substance Use Among Students in 36 European Countries. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs; 2012.
6.
HuckleT, SweetsurP, MoyesS, CasswellS. Ready to drinks are associated with heavier drinking patterns among young females. Drug Alcohol Rev.2008;27:398–403.
7.
KeyesKM, GrantBF, HasinDS. Evidence for a closing gender gap in alcohol use, abuse, and dependence in the United States population. Drug Alcohol Depend.2008;93:21–29.
8.
ElgarFJ, PhillipsN, HammondN. Trends in alcohol and drug use among Canadian adolescents, 1990–2006. Can J Psychiatry.2011;56:243–247.
9.
GruczaRA, NorbergKE, BierutLJ. Binge drinking among youths and young adults in the United States: 1979–2006. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2009;48:692–702.
10.
RichterM, KuntscheE, de LoozeM, PfortnerTK. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent alcohol use in Germany between 1994 and 2006. Int J Public Health.2013;58:777–784.
11.
de LoozeM, RaaijmakersQ, BogtTT, . Decreases in adolescent weekly alcohol use in Europe and North America: evidence from 28 countries from 2002 to 2010. Eur J Public Health.2015;25(Suppl 2):69–72.
12.
LivingstonM. Trends in non-drinking among Australian adolescents. Addiction.2014;109:922–929.
13.
Simons-MortonBG, FarhatT, ter BogtTFM, . Gender specific trends in alcohol use: cross-cultural comparisons from 1998 to 2006 in 24 countries and regions. Int J Public Health.2009;54(Suppl 2):199–208.
14.
GoddardE, GreenH. General Household Survey 2005: Smoking and Drinking Among Adults, 2005. London: Office for National Statistics; 2006.
15.
RehmJ. Re-examining the theory about the collectivity of changes in alcohol consumption. Addiction.2014;109:1397–1398.
16.
PennayA, LivingstonM, MacLeanS. Young people are drinking less: it is time to find out why. Drug Alcohol Rev.2015;34:115–118.
17.
DemersA, KairouzS. A multilevel analysis of change in alcohol consumption in Quebec, 1993–98. Addiction.2003;98:205–213.
18.
HallgrenM, LeifmanH, AndreassonS. Drinking less but greater harm: could polarized drinking habits explain the divergence between alcohol consumption and harms among youth?Alcohol Alcohol.2012;47:581–590.
19.
Department of Health. Victorian Youth Alcohol and Drug Survey. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Drug and Alcohol Prevention Council; 2010.
20.
JohnstonLD, O'MalleyPM, BachmanJG, SchulenbergJE. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2012: Volume I, Secondary School Students. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2013.
21.
MeierPS. Polarized drinking patterns and alcohol deregulation. Nord Stud Alcohol Drugs.2010;27:383–408.
22.
RoomR, OsterbergE, RamstedtM, RehmJ. Explaining change and stasis in alcohol consumption. Addict Res Theory.2009;17:562–576.
23.
SkogOJ. The collectivity of drinking cultures: a theory of the distribution of alcohol consumption. Br J Addict.1985;80:83–99.
24.
LivingstonM, RoomR. Commentary on Norstrom & Svensson (2014) and Rossow et al. (2014): understanding how population-level alcohol consumption changes. Addiction.2014;109:1456–1458.
25.
SkogOJ. Commentary on Gmel & Rehm's interpretation of the theory of collectivity of drinking culture. Drug Alcohol Rev.2001;20:325–331.
26.
RoomR. The impossible dream? Routes to reducing alcohol problems in a temperance culture. J Subst Abuse Treat.1992;4:91–106.
27.
BenachJ, MalmusiD, YasuiY, MartínezJM, MuntanerC. Beyond Rose's strategies: a typology of scenarios of policy impact on population health and health inequalities. Int J Health Serv.2011;41:1–9.
28.
SigfusdottirID, KristjanssonAL, ThorlindssonT, AllegranteJP. Trends in prevalence of substance use among Icelandic adolescents, 1995–2006. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy.2008;3:12.
29.
KuntscheE, KuntscheS, KnibbeR, . Cultural and gender convergence in adolescent drunkenness: evidence from 23 European and North American countries. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.2011;165:152–158.
30.
Sánchez-QueijaI, MorenoC, RiveraF, RamosP. Alcohol consumption trends among Spanish school-aged adolescents in the first decade of the 21st century. Gac Sanit.2015;29:184–189.
31.
HuckleT, HuakauJ, SweetsurP, HuismanO, CasswellS. Density of alcohol outlets and teenage drinking: living in an alcogenic environment is associated with higher consumption in a metropolitan setting. Addiction.2008;103:1614–1621.
32.
CasswellS, PledgerM, HooperR. Socioeconomic status and drinking patterns in young adults. Addiction.2003;98:601–610.
33.
Vinther-LarsenM, HuckleT, YouR, CasswellS. Area level deprivation and drinking patterns among adolescents. Health Place.2013;19:53–58.
34.
LemstraM, BennettNR, NeudorfC, . A meta-analysis of marijuana and alcohol use by socio-economic status in adolescents aged 10–15 years. Can J Public Health.2008;99:172–177.
35.
ReichB. The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks. London: University College London; 2016.
36.
SampsonRJ, RaudenbushSW, EarlsF. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science.1997;277:918–924.
37.
ClarkT, FlemingT, BullenP, . Health and well-being of secondary school students in New Zealand: trends between 2001, 2007 and 2012. J Paediatr Child Health.2013;49:925–934.
38.
DawsonDA. Methodological issues in measuring alcohol use. Alcohol Res Health.2003;27:18–29.
39.
LoCC, WeberJ, ChengTC. Urban-rural differentials: a spatial analysis of Alabama students’ recent alcohol use and marijuana use. Am J Addict.2013;22:188–196.
40.
BrownSA, McGueM, MaggsJ, . A developmental perspective on alcohol and youths 16 to 20 years of age. Pediatrics.2008;121(Suppl 4):S290–S310.
41.
JacksonN, DennyS, SheridanJ, ZhaoJ, AmeratungaS. Differential effects of neighborhood type on adolescent alcohol use in New Zealand. Prev Sci.2016;17(7):841–851. doi: 10.1007/s11121-11016-10677-11129.
42.
Ministry of Health. Ethnicity Data Protocols for the Health and Disability Sector. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2004.
43.
SchnohrCW, KreinerS, DueE, CurrieC, BoyceW, DiderichsenF. Differential item functioning of a family affluence scale: validation study on data from HBSC 2001/02. Soc Indic Res.2008;89:79–95.
44.
SalmondC, CramptonP, AtkinsonJ. NZDep2006 Index of Deprivation: User's Manual. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Public Health, University of Otago; 2007.
45.
AtkinsonJ, SalmondC, CramptonP. NZDep2013 Index of deprivation. Wellington, New Zealand: University of Otago; 2014.
MaasCJ, HoxJJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology.2005;1:86–92.
48.
RogersEM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; 1962.
49.
GreenMJ, LeylandAH, SweetingH, BenzevalM. Socioeconomic position and early adolescent smoking development: evidence from the British Youth Panel Survey (1994–2008). Tob Control.2016;25(2):203–221. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051630.
50.
KuipersMA, NagelhoutGE, WillemsenMC, KunstAE. Widening educational inequalities in adolescent smoking following national tobacco control policies in the Netherlands in 2003: a time–series analysis. Addiction.2014;109:1750–1759.
51.
CatalanoRF, HawkinsJD. The social development model: a theory of antisocial behavior. In: HawkinsJD, ed. Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996:149–197.
52.
AberJL, GephartM, Brooks-GunnJ, ConnellJ, SpencerMB. Neighborhood, family, and individual processes as they influence child and adolescent outcomes. In: Brooks-GunnJ, DuncanGJ, AberJL, eds. Neighborhood Poverty: Volume 1. Context and Consequences for Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997:44–61.
53.
KeyesKM, JagerJ, HamiltonA, O'MalleyPM, MiechR, SchulenbergJE. National multi-cohort time trends in adolescent risk preference and the relation with substance use and problem behavior from 1976 to 2011. Drug Alcohol Depend.2015;155:267–274.
54.
GreavesL, JategaonkarN. Tobacco policies and vulnerable girls and women: toward a framework for gender sensitive policy development. J Epidemiol Community Health.2006;60(Suppl 2):ii57–ii65.
55.
GreavesL, ValloneD, VelicerW. Special effects: tobacco policies and low socioeconomic status girls and women. J Epidemiol Community Health.2006;60(Suppl 2):ii1–ii2.
56.
GunasekaraFI, WilsonN. Very cheap drinking in New Zealand: some alcohol is more affordable than bottled water and nearly as cheap as milk. N Z Med J.2012;123:103–107.
57.
BaborT, HolderH, CaetanoR, . Controlling affordability: pricing and taxation. In: BaborT, CaetanoR, CasswellS, ., eds. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity: Research and Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010.
58.
ChaloupkaFJ, GrossmanM, SafferH. The effects of price on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Res Health.2002;26:22–34.
59.
PampelFC. Diffusion, cohort change, and social patterns of smoking. Soc Sci Res.2005;34:117–139.
60.
JohnsonRA, HoffmannJP. Adolescent cigarette smoking in U.S. racial/ethnic subgroups: findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study. J Health Soc Behav.2000;41:392–407.
61.
MillsC. Health, employment and recession: the impact of the Global Crisis on health inequities in New Zealand. Policy Q.2010;6:53–59.
62.
PohoreckyLA. Interaction of ethanol and stress: research with experimental animals—an update. Alcohol Alcohol.1990;25:263–276.
63.
NorströmT, PapeH. Is the association between youth drinking and violence modified by socio-economic status?Eur J Public Health.2015;25(Suppl 3):120.
64.
SchweinsburgAD, McQueenyT, NagelBJ, EylerLT, TapertSF. A preliminary study of functional magnetic resonance imaging response during verbal encoding among adolescent binge drinkers. Alcohol.2010;44:111–117.
65.
McCambridgeJ, McAlaneyJ, RoweR. Adult consequences of late adolescent alcohol consumption: a systematic review of cohort studies. PLoS Med.2011;8:e1000413.
66.
MäkeläP, PaljärviT. Do consequences of a given pattern of drinking vary by socioeconomic status? A mortality and hospitalisation follow-up for alcohol-related causes of the Finnish Drinking Habits Surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health.2008;62:728–733.
67.
GrittnerU, KuntscheS, GrahamK, BloomfieldK. Social inequalities and gender differences in the experience of alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Alcohol.2012;47:597–605.
BrookesST, WhitleyE, PetersTJ, MulheranPA, EggerM, Davey SmithG. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Health Technol Assess.2001;5(33):1–56.
