Testing Mediational Processes of Substance use Relapse among Youth who Participated in a Mobile Texting Aftercare Project

Abstract

Background

The goal of this paper is to advance the understanding of mechanisms of action involved in behavioral-driven aftercare interventions for substance use disorders (SUDs) among youth populations. This paper reports data from a study that measured the impact of an aftercare intervention on primary substance use relapse among youth who completed treatment in Los Angeles County for SUDs. The aftercare intervention, Project ESQYIR-Educating and Supporting inQuisitive Youth In Recovery, utilized text messaging to monitor relapse and recovery processes, provide feedback, reminders, support, and education among youth from SUD specialty settings during the initial 3-month period following treatment completion.

Method

Mediational modeling informed by Baron and Kenny was used to examine the extent to which select recovery processes including participation in extracurricular activities and self-help, were impacted by the texting intervention, and if such processes helped sustain recovery and prevent primary substance use relapse. The data come from a two-group randomized controlled pilot study testing the initial efficacy of a mobile health texting aftercare intervention among 80 youth (M_age= 20.7, SD = 3.5, range: 14–26 years) who volunteered to participate after completing SUD treatment between 2012 and 2013.

Results

Among the two recovery processes examined in the mediational modeling, only involvement in extracurricular activities mediated the effects of the texting aftercare intervention on reductions in primary substance use relapse; not self-help participation.

Conclusion

Findings from this pilot study offer greater understanding about potential recovery-related mechanisms of action of mobile aftercare interventions. Mobile texting was found to promote increased engagement in recovery-related behaviors such as participation in extracurricular activities, which mediated the effects of the mobile aftercare intervention on decreasing primary substance use relapse. Findings suggest mobile approaches may be effective for increasing adherence to a wide-array of recovery behavioral regiments among youth populations challenged by complex behavioral issues.

Keywords

Aftercare text messaging mental health recovery substance-related disorders recurrence adolescent

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gonzales

, Ang

, Murphy

, Glik

, Anglin

MD.

Substance use recovery outcomes among a cohort of youth participating in a mobile-based texting aftercare pilot program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;47(1):20–26.

Baron

, Kenny

DA.

The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2017. (HHS Publication No. SMA 17-5044, NSDUH Series H-52).

Waldron

, Slesnick

, Brody

, Turner

, Peterson

TR.

Treatment outcomes for adolescent substance abuse at 4- and 7-month assessments. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(5):802–813.

Williams

, Chang

SY.

A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Clin Psychol-Sci Pr. 2006;7(2):138–166.

Waldron

, Turner

CW.

Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for adolescent substance abuse. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008;37(1):238–261.

Chung

, Maisto

SA.

Relapse to alcohol and other drug use in treated adolescents: review and reconsideration of relapse as a change point in clinical course. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(2):149–161.

Humphreys

, Wing

, McCarty

Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems: toward evidence-based practice and policy. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;26(3):151–158. discussion 159-165.

Padwa

, Urada

, Gauthier

Organizing publicly funded substance use disorder treatment in the United States: moving toward a service system approach. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016;69:9–18.

10.

Humphreys

Circles of Recovery: Self-Help Organizations for Addictions. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

11.

Sussman

A review of alcoholics anonymous/narcotics anonymous programs for teens. Eval Health Prof. 2010;33(1):26–55.

12.

Gonzales

, Anglin

, Beattie

, Ong

, Glik

DC.

Understanding recovery barriers: youth perceptions about substance use relapse. Am J Health Behav. 2012;36(5):602–614.

13.

Gonzales

, Anglin

, Beattie

, Ong

, Glik

DC.

Perceptions of chronicity and recovery among youth in treatment for substance use problems. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(2):144–149.

14.

Heflinger

, Hinshaw

SP.

Stigma in child and adolescent mental health services research: Understanding professional and institutional stigmatization of youth with mental health problems and their families. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010;37(1–2):61–70.

15.

Kelly

, Yeterian

, Cristello

, Kaminer

, Kahler

, Timko

Developing and testing Twelve-Step facilitation for adolescents with substance use disorder: manual development and preliminary outcomes. Subst Abuse 2016;10:55–64.

16.

Kelly

, Brown

, Abrantes

, Kahler

, Myers

Social recovery model: an 8-year investigation of adolescent 12-step group involvement following inpatient treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32(8):1468–1478.

17.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA]. TIP 32: treatment of adolescents with substance use disorders. 2012; http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-32-Treatment-of-Adolescents-With-Substance-Use-Disorders/SMA12-4080.

18.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHS]. Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon general's Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHS]; 2016.

19.

Winters

, Botzet

, Stinchfield

Adolescent substance abuse treatment: a review of evidence-based research. In: Leukefeld

, Gullotta

, Staton-Tindall

, eds. Adolescent Substance Abuse: Evidence-Based Approaches to Prevention and Treatment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media; 2018:141–171.

20.

Dennis

, Scott

CK.

Managing addiction as a chronic condition. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2007;4(1):45–55.

21.

McKay JR.

The role of continuing care in outpatient alcohol treatment programs. Recent Dev Alcohol 2001;15:357–372.

22.

McKay JR.

Effectiveness of continuing care interventions for substance abusers. Implications for the study of long-term treatment effects. Eval Rev. 2001;25(2):211–232.

23.

McKay JR.

Continuing care in the treatment of addictive disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2006;8(5):355–362.

24.

McKay JR.

Treating Substance Use Disorders with Adaptive Continuing Care. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009.

25.

Kaminer

, Godley

From assessment reactivity to aftercare for adolescent substance abuse: are we there yet?

Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2010;19(3):577–590.

26.

Godley

, Garner

, Passetti

, Funk

, Dennis

, Godley

MD.

Adolescent outpatient treatment and continuing care: main findings from a randomized clinical trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;110(1–2):44–54.

27.

Alcoholics Anonymous. Young People and AA. New York, NY: AA World Services; 2007.

28.

Dennis

, Godley

, Diamond

The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27(3):197–213.

29.

Majer

, Jason

, Ferrari JR , Miller

SA.

12-Step involvement among a U.S. national sample of Oxford House residents. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011;41(1):37–44.

30.

Brown

, Tapert

SF.

Adolescence and the trajectory of alcohol use: basic to clinical studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1021:234–244.

31.

Carroll

, Onken

LS.

Behavioral therapies for drug abuse. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(8):1452–1460.

32.

Iguchi

, Belding

, Morral

, Lamb

, Husband

SD.

Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: an effective alternative for reducing drug use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(3):421–428.

33.

Brown

, Anderson

, Ramo

, Tomlinson

KL.

Treatment of adolescent alcohol-related problems. A translational perspective. Recent Dev Alcohol 2005;17:327–348.

34.

Kelly

, Greene

MC.

Where there's a will there's a way: a longitudinal investigation of the interplay between recovery motivation and self-efficacy in predicting treatment outcome. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(3):928–934.

35.

Kaminer

, Ohannessian

, McKay JR , Burke

, Flannery

Goal commitment predicts treatment outcome for adolescents with alcohol use disorder. Addict Behav. 2018;76:122–128.

36.

Godley

, Godley

, Dennis

, Funk

, Passetti

, Petry

NM.

A randomized trial of assertive continuing care and contingency management for adolescents with substance use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(1):40–51.

37.

Godley

, Passetti

, Subramaniam

, Funk

, Smith

, Meyers

RJ.

Adolescent community reinforcement approach implementation and treatment outcomes for youth with opioid problem use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;174:9–16.

38.

Nash

, Collier

The Alternative Peer Group: a developmentally appropriate recovery support model for adolescents. J Addict Nurs. 2016;27(2):109–119.

39.

Anderson

, Ramo

, Schulte

, Cummins

, Brown

SA.

Substance use treatment outcomes for youth: integrating personal and environmental predictors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88(1):42–48.

40.

Winters

, Tanner-Smith

, Bresani

, Meyers

Current advances in the treatment of adolescent drug use. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014;5:199–210.

41.

Cockerham

WC.

Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46(1):51–67.

42.

Barr

, Robinson

, Marin-Link

The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. HCQ. 2003;7(1):73–82.

43.

de Jongh

, Gurol-Urganci

, Vodopivec-Jamsek

, Car

, Atun

Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD007459.

44.

Wagner

, Austin

, Davis

, Hindmarsh

, Schaefer

, Bonomi

Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(6):64–78.

45.

Marsch

, Borodovsky

JT.

Technology-based interventions for preventing and treating substance use among youth. Child Adol Psych Cl. 2016;25(4):755–768.

46.

Saitz

, Larson

, Labelle

, Richardson

, Samet

JH.

The case for chronic disease management for addiction. J Addict Med. 2008;2(2):55–65.

47.

Gonzales

, Hernandez

, Murphy

, Ang

Youth recovery outcomes at 6 and 9 months following participation in a mobile texting recovery support aftercare pilot study. Am J Addict. 2016;25(1):62–68.

48.

Gonzales

, Anglin

, Glik

, Zavalza

Perceptions about recovery needs and drug-avoidance recovery behaviors among youth in substance abuse treatment. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2013;45(4):297–303.

49.

Kaminer

, Bukstein

, Tarter

RE.

The Teen-Addiction Severity Index: rationale and reliability. Int J Addict. 1991;26(2):219–226.

50.

Kaminer

, Wagner

, Plummer

, Seifer

Validation of the Teen Addiction Severity Index (T-ASI): preliminary findings. Am J Addict. 1993;2(3):250–254.

51.

Bock

RD.

A brief history of item theory response. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2005;16(4):21–33.

52.

Rasch

Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1980.

53.

Cacciola

, Alterman

, Dephilippis

Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM). J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013;44(3):256–263.

54.

JMP Pro 14 [Computer Program]. Version 14. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2017.

55.

PASS 14 [Computer Program]. Version 14. Kaysville, UT: National Council for the Social Studies; 2015.

56.

Littell

, Milliken

GA.

SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2006.

57.

Raudenbush

, Bryk

AS.

Hierarchial Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.

58.

Shin

JH.

Application of repeated-measures analysis of variance and hierarchical linear model in nursing research. Nurs Res. 2009;58(3):211–217.

59.

Hayes

AF.

Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–420.

60.

Kenny

, Kashy

, Bolger

Data analysis in social psychology. In: Gilbert

, Fiske

, Lindzey

, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 1998:233–265.

61.

Gonzales

, Douglas Anglin

, Glik

DC.

Exploring the feasibility of text messaging to support substance abuse recovery among youth in treatment. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(1):13–22.

62.

Elder

, Leaver-Dunn

, Wang

, Nagy

, Green

Organized group activity as a protective factor against adolescent substance use. Am J Health Behav. 2000;24(2):108–113.

63.

Zill

Adolescent Time Use, Risky Behavior, and Outcomes: An Analysis of National Data. Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc. 1995.

64.

Mahoney

, Stattin

Leisure activities and adolescent antisocial behavior: the role of structure and social context. J Adolesc. 2000;23(2):113–127.

65.

Bronfenbrenner

The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.

66.

Caldwell

, Darling

Leisure context, parental control, and resistance to peer pressure as predictors of adolescent partying and substance use: an ecological perspective. J Leis Res. 1999;31(1):57–77.

67.

Urban

, Lewin-Bizan

, Lerner

RM.

The role of intentional self regulation, lower neighborhood ecological assets, and activity involvement in youth developmental outcomes. J Youth Adolesc. 2010;39(7):783–800.

68.

Wray-Lake

, Syvertsen

, Flanagan

CA.

Developmental change in social responsibility during adolescence: an ecological perspective. Dev Psychol. 2016;52(1):130–142.

69.

Catalano

, Kosterman

, Hawkins

, Newcomb

, Abbott

RD.

Modeling the etiology of adolescent substance use: a test of the social development model. J Drug Issues. 1996;26(2):429–455.

70.

Rappaport

In praise of paradox: a social policy of empowerment over prevention. Am J Community Psychol. 1981;9(1):1–25.

71.

Mechanic

Adolescents at risk: new directions. J Adolesc Health. 1991;12(8):638–643.

72.

Brown

SA.

Facilitating change for adolescent alcohol problems: a multiple options approach. In: Wagner

, Waldron

, eds. Innovations in Adolescent Substance Abuse Interventions. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Pergamon/Elsevier Science; 2001:169–187.

73.

Brown

, Ramo

DE.

Clinical course of youth following treatment for alcohol and drug problems. In: Liddle HA, Rowe CL, eds. Adolescent Substance Abuse: Research and Clinical Advances. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006:79–103. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511543968.005

74.

Jones

, Lekhak

, Kaewluang

Using mobile phones and short message service to deliver self-management interventions for chronic conditions: a meta-review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014;11(2):81–88.

75.

Suffoletto

, Callaway

, Kristan

, Monti

, Clark

DB.

Mobile phone text message intervention to reduce binge drinking among young adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013;14(1):93.

76.

Franklin

, Waller

, Pagliari

, Greene

SA.

A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text-messaging system to support young people with diabetes. Diabetic Med. 2006;23(12):1332–1338.

77.

Dowshen

, Kuhns

, Johnson

Mobile phone text messaging can help young people manage asthma. BMJ 2002;325:600.

78.

Leach-Lemens

Using mobile phones in HIV care and prevention. HIV AIDS Treat Pract. 2009;137:2–8.

79.

Lim

MSC

, Hocking

, Hellard

, Aitken

CK.

SMS STI: a review of the uses of mobile phone text messaging in sexual health. Int J STD Aids. 2008;19(5):287–290.

80.

Rodgers

, Corbett

, Bramley

Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging. Tob Control. 2005;14(4):255–261.

81.

Humphreys

, Moos

RH.

Encouraging posttreatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: two-year clinical and utilization outcomes. Alcoholism Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(1):64–68.

82.

Kelly

, Myers

, Brown

SA.

A multivariate process model of adolescent 12-step attendance and substance use outcome following inpatient treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000;14(4):376–389.

83.

Kelly

JF.

Do adolescents affiliate with 12‐step groups? A multivariate process model of effects. Diss Abstr Int. 2001;62:1583.

84.

Kelly

, Myers

MG.

Adolescents’ participation in alcoholics anonymous and narcotics anonymous: review, implications and future directions. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007;39(3):259–269.

85.

Godley

, Godley

, Dennis

, Funk

, Passetti

LL.

Preliminary outcomes from the assertive continuing care experiment for adolescents discharged from residential treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23(1):21–32.

86.

Kelly

, Yeterian

JD.

The role of mutual-help groups in extending the framework of treatment. Alcohol Res Health. 2011;33(4):350–355.

87.

Green

, Fullilove

RE.

Stories of spiritual awakening. The nature of spirituality in recovery. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998;15(4):325–331.

88.

Kaskutas

, Kaskutas

, Bond

, Weisner

The role of religion, spirituality and alcoholics anonymous in sustained sobriety. Alcohol Treat Q. 2003;21(1):1–16.

89.

Kelly

, Magill

, Stout

RL.

How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systemic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in alcoholics anonymous. Addict Res Theory. 2009;17(3):236–259.

90.

Cain

Personal stories: identity acquisition and self‐understanding in alcoholics anonymous. Ethos 1991;19(2):210–253.

91.

Wiers

, Boelema

, Nikolaou

, Gladwin

TE.

On the development of implicit and control processes in relation to substance use in adolescence. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2(2):141–155.

92.

Doremus-Fitzwater

, Varlinskaya

, Spear

LP.

Motivational systems in adolescence: Possible implications for age differences in substance abuse and other risk-taking behaviors. Brain Cogn. 2010;72(1):114–123.

93.

Smith

, Cleeland

, Dennis

ML.

Reasons for quitting among emerging adults and adolescents in substance-use-disorder treatment. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71(3):400–409.

94.

Barnett

, Sussman

, Smith

, Rohrbach

, Spruijt-Metz

Reasons for quitting among emerging adults and adolescents in substance-use-disorder treatment. Addict Behav. 2012;37(12):1325–1334.

95.

Flood

, McDevitt-Murphy

, Weathers

, Eakin

, Benson

TA.

Substance use behaviors as a mediator between posttraumatic stress disorder and physical health in trauma-exposed college students. J Behav Med. 2009;32(3):234–243.

96.

Kaminer

Youth Substance Abuse and co-Occurring Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2016.

97.

McKay JR.

Making the hard work of recovery more attractive for those with substance use disorders. Addiction. 2017;112(5):751–757.