The synergistic combination of mechanical fatigue stresses and environmental agents acting together can be more detrimental than that of the summation of the contributions of each mechanism acting separately. Major attempts to understand the contribution of the different agents (microstructure, chemical composition of environment, temperature, loading conditions, etc.) have been reported in the literature. Nevertheless, current knowledge is insufficient to address life estimation with a sound physical basis from the initiation of localised corrosion (such as pitting) to the estimation of crack propagation. Major simplifications and assumptions have been required in the development of life prediction methodologies. This paper reviews recent efforts made by the different interested parties, in both academia and industry, in the development of corrosion fatigue (CF) lifetime prediction procedures. The paper mainly focuses on the methodologies proposed in the literature for oil and gas, nuclear, energy generation and aerospace applications, dealing with pitting CF damage in aluminium alloys, carbon and stainless steels. The transition of a pit into a small crack (SC) and its growth is influenced by the interaction of the pit stress/strain concentration and the local environmental conditions, making the modelling of this stage of the utmost complexity. A major trend in the models reviewed in this paper is to simplify the analysis by assuming the pit (a volumetric defect) as a sharp crack, decouple the CF problem and account for the mechanical and environmental contributions separately. These procedures heavily rely on fitting experimental data and exhibit low generality in terms of application to varying system conditions. There is a clear opportunity in this field to develop mechanistically based methodologies, considering the inherent dependence of the damage mechanism on the interaction of environmental, metallurgical and mechanical features, allowing more realistic lifetime estimates and defect tolerance arguments, where pit-to-crack transition and SC initiation stages pose a significant challenge.
Abbreviation: ASME: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; API: American Petroleum Institute; BP: British Petroleum; BS: British Standards; BWR: Boiling Water Reactor; CF: Corrosion fatigue; DNV: Det Norske Veritas; FCGR: Fatigue crack growth rate; FCI: Fatigue crack initiation; FCP: Fatigue crack propagation; FFS: Fitness for service; HA: Hydrogen assisted; HRR: Hutchinson, Rice and Rosengren stress fields; LC: Long crack; LEFM: Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics; S-N: Stress vs. number of cycles
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EasonEDNelsonEEGilmanJD.Technical basis for a revised fatigue crack growth rate reference curve for ferritic steels in light water reactor environments. Am Soc Mech Eng Pressure Vessels Piping Div (Publication) PVP. 1994;286:81–95.
2.
O'DonnellTPO'DonnellWJ.Cyclic rate-dependent fatigue life in reactor water. Am Soc Mech Eng Pressure Vessels Piping Div (Publication) PVP. 1995;306:59–69.
3.
EasonEDNelsonEEHeysGB.Fatigue crack growth rate of medium and low sulfur ferritic steels in pressurized water reactor primary water environments. Am Soc Mech Eng, Pressure Vessels and Piping Div (Publication) PVP. 2003;453:123–134.
4.
ScottPMTiceDR.Stress corrosion in low alloy steels. Nucl Eng Des. 1990;119(2–3):399–413. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(90)90180-6
5.
HicklingJBlindD.Strain-induced corrosion cracking of low-alloy steels in LWR systems – case histories and identification of conditions leading to susceptibility. Nucl Eng Des. 1986;91(3):305–330. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(86)90084-1
6.
SeifertHPRitterSHicklingJ.Research and service experience with environmentally assisted cracking of low-alloy steel pressure-boundary components under LWR conditions. Power Plant Chem. 2004;6(2):111–123.
7.
LenzEWielingN.Strain-induced corrosion cracking of low-alloy steels in LWR-systems – interpretation of susceptibility by means of a three dimensional (T, ε, dissolved oxygen) diagram. Nucl Eng Des. 1986;91(3):331–344. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(86)90085-3
8.
SankaranKKPerezRJataKV.Effects of pitting corrosion on the fatigue behavior of aluminium alloy 7075-t6: modeling and experimental studies. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001;297(1–2):223–229. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01216-8
9.
WangQYPidapartiRMPalakalMJ.Comparative study of corrosion-fatigue in aircraft materials. AIAA J. 2001;39(2):325–330. doi: 10.2514/2.1308
10.
DuQuesnayDLUnderhillPRBrittHJ.Fatigue crack growth from corrosion damage in 7075-t6511 aluminium alloy under aircraft loading. Int J Fatigue. 2003;25(5):371–377. doi: 10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00168-8
11.
ESDU. Effect of environment on Fatigue crack propagation in Aluminium Alloy sheet and plate. ESDU series 88007; 1988. p. 36–37.
12.
ChubbJPMoradTAHockenhullBSBristowJW.The effect of exfoliation corrosion on the fatigue behavior of structural aluminium alloys. In: AtluriSNSampathSGTongP, editors. Structural integrity of aging airplanes. Springer Series in Computational Mechanics.
Berlin, Heidelberg
: Springer; 1991.
13.
WallaceWHoeppnerDWKandacharPV.AGARD corrosion handbook, volume 1. Aircraft corrosion: causes and case histories. NATO Science and Technology Organization; 1985.
14.
Luccia JJDeGergarRDJankowskyEJ.AGARD corrosion handbook, volume 2. Aircraft corrosion control documents: A descriptive catalogue. NATO Science and Technology Organization; 1985.
15.
IshiiHSakakibaraYEbaraR.Effect of heat treatments on the corrosion fatigue properties of 13 pct chromium stainless steel in 3 PCT NaCl aqueous solution. Metall Trans A. 1982;13A(8):1521–1529. doi: 10.1007/BF02642891
16.
EbaraR.Corrosion fatigue crack initiation in 12% chromium stainless steel. Mat Sci Eng A. 2007;468–470:109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.128
17.
DonahueJRBurnsJT.Effect of chloride concentration on the corrosion-fatigue crack behavior of an age-hardenable martensitic stainless steel. Int J Fatigue. 2016;9(1):79–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.022
18.
BrennanFP.A framework for variable amplitude corrosion fatigue materials tests for offshore wind steel support structures. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct (UK). 2014;37(7):717–721. doi: 10.1111/ffe.12184
19.
TurnbullA.Corrosion pitting and environmentally assisted small crack growth. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014;470(2169): art. no. 20140254. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0254
20.
WuXKatadaY.Strain-rate dependence of low cycle fatigue behavior in a simulated bwr environment. Corros Sci. 2005;47(6):1415–1428. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.07.037
21.
LeeSGKimIS.Strain rate effects on the fatigue crack growth of SA508 cl.3 reactor pressure vessel steel in high-temperature water environment. J Press Vess-T ASME. 2001;123(2):173–178. doi: 10.1115/1.1334378
22.
SeifertHPRitterS.Evaluation and Assessment of the BWRVIP-60 SCC Crack Growth Curves for Low-Alloy Steels under BWR/NWC Conditions. Annual Meeting of the International Cooperative Group on Environmentally Assisted Cracking of Light Water Reactor Materials, Paper No. L6; 2003 May 11–16, Ottawa, Canada.
23.
AtkinsonJDChenZ.The effect of temperature on corrosion fatigue crack propagation in reactor pressure vessel steels. In Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems-water reactors; 1993. p. 29–34.
24.
JamesLA.Effect of temperature and cyclic frequency upon fatigue crack growth behavior of several steels in an elevated temperature aqueous environment. J Press Vess – T ASME. 1994;116(2):122–127. doi: 10.1115/1.2929565
25.
ChenYYShihHCWangLH, et al. Factors affecting the crack growth rates of reactor pressure vessel steels under simulated boiling water reactor conditions. Corrosion. 2006;62(5):403–418. doi: 10.5006/1.3278278
26.
SeifertHPRitterS.Corrosion fatigue crack growth behaviour of low-alloy reactor pressure vessel steels under boiling water reactor conditions. Corros Sci. 2008;50(7):1884–1899. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.03.010
27.
AtkinsonJDYuJChenZ-Y.An analysis of the effects of sulphur content and potential on corrosion fatigue crack growth in reactor pressure vessel steels. Corr Sci. 1996;38(5):755–765. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(95)00164-F
28.
LiY-FFarringtonGCLairdC.Cyclic response-electrochemical interaction in mono- and polycrystalline aisi 316l stainless steel in H2SO4 solution-ii. Potential dependence of the transient dissolution behavior during corrosion fatigue. Acta Metall Mater. 1993;41(3):709–721. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90004-C
29.
TsaiW-TMoccariASzklarska-SmialowskaZ, et al. Effect of potential on the corrosion fatigue crack growth rate in AISI 304 stainless steel in sodium sulfate solution at 250 C. Corrosion. 1984;40(11):573–583. doi: 10.5006/1.3581920
30.
TiceDRWorswickDHurstP, et al. Influence of mean stress and temperature on corrosion fatigue crack growth of reactor pressure vessel steels. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems – Water Reactors; 1993. p. 19–27.
31.
CorsettiLVDuquetteDJ.Effect of mean stress and environment on corrosion fatigue behavior of 7075-T6 aluminium. Metall Trans. 1974;5(5):1087–1093. doi: 10.1007/BF02644320
32.
WangJWangZMaM, et al. Influence of strain amplitude on the transient current behaviour in corrosion fatigue of Fe-26Cr-1Mo. Steel Res. 1992;63(10):453–456. doi: 10.1002/srin.199201741
33.
StephensRISchraderCDLeaseKB.Corrosion fatigue of AZ91E-T6 cast magnesium alloy in a 3.5 percent NaCl aqueous environment. J Eng Mater – T ASME. 1995;117(3):293–298. doi: 10.1115/1.2804542
34.
WuXQKatadaY.Strain-amplitude dependent fatigue resistance of low-alloy pressure vessel steels in high-temperature water. J Mater Sci. 2005;40(8):1953–1958. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1216-4
35.
ScottPM, A review of environmental effects on pressure vessel integrity. Proceedings of the Third Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors; 1988. p. 15–29.
36.
ScottPM.Data acquisition. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 1989;40(5):335–342. doi: 10.1016/0308-0161(89)90096-3
37.
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. Fitness-for-service. Fitness-for-service. Washington, DC: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2007.
38.
BS 7910. Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures.
London
: British Standards Institution; 2013.
39.
ZerbstUSchödelMWebsterSAinsworthR.Fitness-for-service fracture assessment of structures containing cracks: a workbook based on the European SINTAP/FITNET procedure. Academic Press; 2013.
40.
R6. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects, Rev. 4 and subsequent Amendments.
Gloucester
: EDF Energy Generation Limited; 2015.
HoeppnerDWArriscorretaCA.Exfoliation corrosion and pitting corrosion and their role in fatigue predictive modeling: State-of-the-art review. Int J Aerospace Eng. 2012;2012:29. Article ID 191879. doi: 10.1155/2012/191879
43.
LishchukSAkidR.A review of corrosion fatigue modelling methodology. Report on Behalf of BP Exploration Operating Company Limited, Sheffield Hallam University; 2009.
44.
LarrosaNOAinsworthRA, Corrosion-fatigue: a review on the assessment aspects. BP-ICAM & The University of Manchester. Technical report, 2014.
45.
AkidR.The role of stress-assisted localised corrosion in the development of short fatigue cracks. In: Van Der SluysWAPiascikRSZawieruchaR, editors. Effects of the environment on the initiation of crack growth, ASTM STP 1298. Americam Society of Testing and Materials; 1997. p. 3–17.
46.
FrankelGS.Pitting corrosion of metals: A review of the critical factors. J Electrochem Soc. 1998;145(6):2186–2198. doi: 10.1149/1.1838615
47.
RitchieROLankfordJ.Small fatigue cracks:cracks: a statement of the problem and potential solutions. Mater Sci Eng. 1986;84:11–16. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(86)90217-X
48.
LukaszewiczMZhouSTurnbullA.Novel concepts on the growth of corrosion fatigue small and short cracks. Mater Corros. 2015;66(12):1488–1490. doi: 10.1002/maco.201508390
49.
ZhouSLukaszewiczMTurnbullA.Small and short crack growth and the solution-conductivity dependent electrochemical crack size effect. Corr Sci. 2015;97:25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.03.008
50.
GanglofRP.Criticality of crack size in aqueous corrosion fatigue. Res Mech Lett. 1981;1(7):299–306.
51.
UhligHH.Adsorbed and reaction-product films on metals. J Electrochem Soc. 1950;97(11):215C. doi: 10.1149/1.2777892
52.
KolotyrkinYaM.Effects of anions on the dissolution kinetics of metals. J Electrochem Soc. 1961;108(3):209–216. doi: 10.1149/1.2428048
53.
LeckieHPUhligHH.Environmental factors affecting the critical potential for pitting in 18-8 stainless steel. J Electrochem Soc. 1966;113(12):1262–1267. doi: 10.1149/1.2423801
54.
HoarTPJacobWR.Breakdown of passivity of stainless steel by halide ions. Nature. 1967;216(5122):1299–1301. doi: 10.1038/2161299a0
55.
HoarTP.The production and breakdown of the passivity of metals. Corr Sci. 1967;7(6):341–355. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(67)80023-4
56.
BoehniHUhligHH.Environmental factors affecting the critical pitting potential of aluminium. Electrochem Soc J. 1969;116(7):906–910. doi: 10.1149/1.2412167
57.
Szklarska-SmialowskaZ.Pitting corrosion of metals. Houston (TX): NACE; 1986.
58.
CottisRAMarkfieldAHartopoulasP.Environment assisted fatigue. Volume 7.
London
: Mechanical Engineering Publications, EGF Publication; 1990. p. 381.
59.
BoukerrouACottisRA.Crack initiation in the corrosion fatigue of structural steels in salt solutions. Corr Sci. 1993;3-5(14):577–585. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(93)90192-J
60.
WangYAkidR.Role of nonmetallic inclusions in fatigue, pitting, and corrosion fatigue. Corrosion (Houston). 1996;52(2):92–102. doi: 10.5006/1.3292108
61.
HoeppnerDW.Corrosion fatigue considerations in materials selections and engineering design. Corrosion Fatigue: Chemistry, Mechanics, and Microstructure, NACE; 1972. p. 3–11.
McAdamDJGellGW.Pitting and its effect on the fatigue limit of steels corroded under various conditions. J P Am Soc Test Mater. 41:696–732.
64.
MagninTCoudreuseL.The effects of strain rate on the corrosion fatigue behaviour of b.c.c. fe26cr1mo stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng. 1985;72(2):125–134. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(85)90151-X
65.
WuXD.Short fatigue crack behaviour of a submarine hull steel in inert and aggressive environments. University of Sheffield, PhD Dissertation, 1995.
66.
LinderJBlomR.Development of a method for corrosion fatigue life prediction of structurally loaded bearing steels. Corrosion. 2001;57(5):404–412. doi: 10.5006/1.3290364
67.
StashchukMH.Analysis of the influence of elastic deformation on the electrode potential of a metal cylinder in a medium. Mater Sci. 2000;36(1):54–59. doi: 10.1007/BF02805117
68.
TurnbullA.6.04 - Environment-assisted fatigue in liquid environments. In: MilneIRitchieROKarihalooB, editors. Comprehensive structural integrity.
Oxford
: Pergamon; 2003, p. 163–210.
69.
MagninTLardonJM.The influence of a 3.5% nacl solution on the fatigue damage evolution in a planar slip f.c.c. stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng. 1985;76:L7–L10. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(85)90100-4
70.
SahalMCreusJSabotR, et al. The effects of dislocation patterns on the dissolution process of polycrystalline nickel. Acta Mater. 2006;54(8):2157–2167. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.006
71.
SahalMCreusJSabotR, et al. Consequences of plastic strain on the dissolution process of polycrystalline nickel in H2SO4 solution. Scr Mater. 2004;51(9):869–873. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.004
72.
LiangJSuoZ.Stress-assisted reaction at a solid-fluid interface. Interface Sci. 2001;9(1-2):93–104. doi: 10.1023/A:1011283115948
73.
HuH.Fatigue and corrosion fatigue crack growth resistance of RQT501. University of Sheffield, PhD Dissertation, 1997.
74.
AkidRMillerKJ.Short fatigue crack growth behaviour of a low carbon steel under corrosion fatigue conditions. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1991;14(6):637–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00693.x
75.
TurnbullAWrightLCrockerL.New insight into the pit-to-crack transition from finite element analysis of the stress and strain distribution around a corrosion pit. Corr Sci. 2010;52(4):1492–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.12.004
76.
ThompsonAWBackofenWA.The effect of grain size on fatigue. Acta Metall. 1971;19(7):597–606. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(71)90012-5
77.
PearsonS.Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension. Eng Fract Mech. 1975;7:235–247. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(75)90004-1
78.
MillerKJ.The two thresholds of fatigue behaviour. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1993;16(9):931–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00129.x
79.
SureshSRitchieRO.Propagation of short fatigue cracks. Int Mater Rev. 1984;29(6):445–476. doi: 10.1179/imr.1984.29.1.445
80.
RitchieROLankfordJ.Small fatigue cracks. Warrendale (PA): The Metallurgical Society of AIME; 1986.
81.
LankfordJ.The growth of a small fatigue cracks in 7076-T6 aluminium. Eng Fract Mech. 1982;5:232–248.
82.
BrownCWKingJEHicksMA.Effects of microstructure on long and short cracks at a sharp notch. Met Sci. 1984;18:374–380. doi: 10.1179/030634584790419881
83.
TairaSTanakaKNakaiY.A model of crack-tip slip band blocked by grain boundary. Mech Res Commun. 1978;5:375–381. doi: 10.1016/0093-6413(78)90014-9
84.
TanakaKNakaiYKawashimaR.Fracture mechanics approach to fatigue crack initiation from deep notches. Eng Fract Mech. 1983;18(5):1011–1023. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(83)90073-5
85.
Miller.KJde los RiosER.The behaviour of short fatigue cracks. 1st ed. London: EGF (ESIS) Publication, Institution of Mechanical Engineers; 1986.
86.
MillerKJde los RiosER.Short fatigue cracks. 13th ed. London: ESIS Publication, Institution of Mechanical Engineers; 1992.
87.
RavichandranKSMurakamiYRitchieRO, editors. Small fatigue cracks: mechanics, mechanisms and applications. Elsevier; 1999.
88.
CatonMJJohnRPorterWJ, et al. Stress ratio effects on small fatigue crack growth in Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Fatigue. 2012;38:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.11.004
89.
BurnsJTLarsenJMGangloffRP.Effect of initiation feature on microstructure-scale fatigue crack propagation in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Int J Fatigue. 2012;42:104–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.001
90.
AhammedMMelchersRE.Reliability estimation of pressurised pipelines subject to localised corrosion defects. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 1996;69(3):267–272. doi: 10.1016/0308-0161(96)00009-9
91.
AhammedM.Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 1998;75(4):321–329. doi: 10.1016/S0308-0161(98)00006-4
92.
PandeyMD.Probabilistic models for condition assessment of oil and gas pipelines. NDT E Int. 1998;31(5):349–358. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00003-6
93.
HongHP.Inspection and maintenance planning of pipeline under external corrosion considering generation of new defects. Struct Saf. 1999;21(3):203–222. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00016-8
94.
PandeyMDYuanX-Xvan NoortwijkJM.The influence of temporal uncertainty of deterioration on life-cycle management of structures. Struc Inf Eng. 2009;5(2):145–156. doi: 10.1080/15732470601012154
95.
CaleyoFVelàzquezJCValorA, et al. Markov chain modelling of pitting corrosion in underground pipelines. Corr Sci. 2009;51(9):2197–2207. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.06.014
96.
VelàzquezJCCaleyoFValorA, et al. Predictive model for pitting corrosion in buried oil and gas pipelines. Corrosion. 2009;65(5):332–342. doi: 10.5006/1.3319138
97.
CaleyoFVelàzquezJCValorA, et al. Probability distribution of pitting corrosion depth and rate in underground pipelines: A Monte Carlo study. Corr Sci. 2009;51(9):1925–1934. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.019
98.
ValorACaleyoFHallenJM, et al. Reliability assessment of buried pipelines based on different corrosion rate models. Corr Sci. 2013;66:78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.005
99.
De LeonDMaciasOF.Effect of spatial correlation on the failure probability of pipelines under corrosion. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 2005;82(2):123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.07.018
100.
ZhouW.System reliability of corroding pipelines. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 2010;87(10):587–595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.07.011
101.
ZhouWHongHPZhangS.Impact of dependent stochastic defect growth on system reliability of corroding pipelines. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 2012;96–97:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.06.005
102.
EbaraR.Corrosion fatigue crack initiation in 12% chromium stainless steel. Mat Sci Eng A. 2007;468–470(SPEC. ISS.):109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.128
103.
KondoY.Prediction of fatigue crack initiation life based on pit growth. Corrosion. 1989;45(1):7–11. doi: 10.5006/1.3577891
104.
BarterSASharpPKHoldenG, et al. Initiation and early growth of fatigue cracks in an aerospace aluminium alloy. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2002;25(2):111–125. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00482.x
105.
GruenbergKMCraigBAHillberryBM, et al. Predicting fatigue life of pre-corroded 2024-T3 aluminum. Int J Fatigue. 2004;26(6):629–640. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.011
106.
BurnsJTKimSGangloffRP.Effect of corrosion severity on fatigue evolution in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Corr Sci. 2010;52(2):498–508. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.006
107.
FatobaO.Experimental and modelling studies of corrosion fatigue damage in a linepipe steel. PhD thesis, The University of Manchester, 2015.
108.
FatobaOLeiva-GarciaRAkidR, et al. Modelling stress-assisted pitting corrosion using a cellular automaton finite element approach. Corros Sci, Under review; 2017.
109.
EvansC.Understanding the pit-crack transition. PhD thesis, The University of Manchester, 2015.
110.
CodaroENNakazatoRZHorovistizAL, et al. An image processing method for morphology characterization and pitting corrosion evaluation. Mat Sci Eng A. 2002;334(1-2):298–306. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01892-5
111.
GhaliEDietzelWKainerK-U.General and localized corrosion of magnesium alloys: A critical review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2004;13(1):7–23. doi: 10.1361/10599490417533
112.
RuskDTHoppeW.Fatigue life prediction of corrosion-damaged high-strength steel using an equivalent stress riser (ESR) model. Part I: Test development and results. Int J Fatigue. 2009;31(10):1454–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.05.006
113.
RuskDTHoppeWBraistedW, et al. Fatigue life prediction of corrosion-damaged high-strength steel using an equivalent stress riser (ESR) model. Part II: Model development and results. Int J Fatigue. 2009;31(10):1464–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.008
114.
BurnsJTLarsenJMGangloffRP.Driving forces for localized corrosion-to-fatigue crack transition in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2011;34(10):745–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01568.x
115.
XuS-HWangY-D.Estimating the effects of corrosion pits on the fatigue life of steel plate based on the 3D profile. Int J Fatigue. 2015;72:27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.11.003
116.
HagnL.Life prediction methods for aqueous environments. Mater Sci Eng. 1988;103(1):193–205. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(88)90566-6
117.
HoeppnerDWChandrasekaranV.Corrosion and corrosion fatigue predictive modelling-state of the art review. FASIDE Report to NCI Information Systems, Fairborn (OH); 1998.
118.
HoeppnerDW.Model for prediction of fatigue lives based upon a pitting corrosion fatigue process. Fatigue Mechanisms, ASTM International; 1979.
119.
LindleyTCMcIntyrePTrantPJ.Fatigue crack initiation at corrosion pits. Met Technol. 1982;9:135–142. doi: 10.1179/030716982803286403
120.
KawaiSKasaiK.Considerations of allowable stress of corrosion fatigue (focused on the influence of pitting). Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1985;8(2):115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1985.tb01198.x
121.
ChenGSGaoMHarlowDGet al.Corrosion and corrosion fatigue of airframe aluminium alloys. In FAA/NASA International Symposium on Advanced Structural Integrity Methods for Airframe Durability and Damage Tolerance; 1994. p. 157–173.
122.
ChenGSGaoMHarlowDGWeiRP.Corrosion and corrosion fatigue of aluminium alloys. Mechanical engineering and mechanics, Lehigh University; 1996.
123.
RokhlinSIKimJ-YNagyH, et al. Effect of pitting corrosion on fatigue crack initiation and fatigue life. Eng Fract Mech. 1999;62(4-5):425–444. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00101-5
124.
CeritMGenelKEksiS.Numerical investigation on stress concentration of corrosion pit. Eng Fail Anal. 2009;16(7):2467–2472. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.04.004
125.
HarlowDGWeiRP.Probability approach for prediction of corrosion and corrosion fatigue life. AIAA J. 1994;32(10):2073–2079. doi: 10.2514/3.12254
126.
MuraTNakasoneY.Theory of fatigue crack initiation in solids. J Appl Mech – T ASME. 1990;57(1):1–6. doi: 10.1115/1.2888304
127.
PineauAMcDowellDBussoEP, et al. Failure of metals II: Fatigue. Acta Mater. 2016;107:484–507. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.050
128.
DunneFMaclachlanDKnowlesDet al.International workshop on quantitative mechanistic nucleation and microstructure-sensitive growth of fatigue cracks.
Oxford
: Pembroke College, University of Oxford; 2017.
129.
IshiharaSSakaSNanZY, et al. Prediction of corrosion fatigue lives of aluminium alloy on the basis of corrosion pit growth law. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2006;29(6):472–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01018.x
130.
MurakamiYEndoM.Quantitative evaluation of fatigue strength of metals containing various small defects or cracks. Eng Fract Mech. 1983;17:1–15. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(83)90027-9
131.
IshiharaSShiozawaKMiyaoK, et al. Effects of fluid flow rate and stress amplitude on the initiation and growth behavior of corrosion pits on an annealed carbon steel. Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, A Hen/Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng Pt A.1991;57(540):1775–1781.
132.
LindströmRJohanssonL-GThompsonGE, et al. Corrosion of magnesium in humid air. Corr Sci. 2004;46(5):1141–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2003.09.010
133.
VajoJJWeiRPhelpsAC, et al. Application of extreme value analysis to crevice corrosion. Corr Sci. 2003;45(3):497–509. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00129-4
134.
HarlowDGWeiRP.A probability model for the growth of corrosion pits in aluminium alloys induced by constituent particles. Eng Fract Mech. 1998;59(3):305–325. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00127-6
135.
SriramanMRPidapartiRM.Life prediction of aircraft Aluminium subjected to pitting corrosion under fatigue conditions. J Aircraft. 2009;46(4):1253–1259. doi: 10.2514/1.40481
136.
DespicARRaicheffRGO'M BockrisJ.Mechanism of the acceleration of the electrodic dissolution of metals during yielding under stress. J Chem Phys. 1968;49(2):926–938. doi: 10.1063/1.1670162
137.
LuBTLuoJLNortonPR, et al. Effects of dissolved hydrogen and elastic and plastic deformation on active dissolution of pipeline steel in anaerobic groundwater of near-neutral pH. Acta Mater. 2009;57(1):41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.035
138.
MaJZhangBWangJ, et al. Anisotropic 3D growth of corrosion pits initiated at MnS inclusions for A537 steel during corrosion fatigue. Corr Sci. 2010;52(9):2867–2877. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.04.036
139.
Newman JrJC.Advances in fatigue and fracture mechanics analyses for metallic aircraft structures. NASA Technical Memorandum (210084):XI–24, 2000.
140.
LiS-XAkidR.Corrosion fatigue life prediction of a steel shaft material in seawater. Eng Fail Anal. 2013;34:324–334. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.08.004
141.
SriramanMRPidapartiRM.Crack initiation life of materials under combined pitting corrosion and cyclic loading. J Mater Eng Perform. 2009;19(1):7–12. doi: 10.1007/s11665-009-9379-9
142.
Program on technology innovation: development of a corrosion-fatigue prediction methodology for steam turbines, test results of 12% Cr blade steel (403/410SS). EPRI, Final Report 1023196: 2012.
143.
SalzmanRNRiegerNFTscheggSSchönbauerBTurnbullAZhouSGandyD.Corrosion-Fatigue in steam turbine blades. In Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plants: Proceedings from the Sixth International Conference, 2010 August 31-September 3,
Santa Fe, New Mexico
, ASM International; 2011. p. 450–469.
144.
SalzmanRGandyDRiegerNSchönbauerBTscheggSZhouSTurnbullA.Corrosion-fatigue prediction methodology for 12% Cr steam turbine blades. ASME 2013 Power Conference, Power2013 (Vol. 98026),
Boston
; 2013.
145.
SchönbauerBMStanzl-TscheggSEPerlegaA, et al. Fatigue life estimation of pitted 12% Cr steam turbine blade steel in different environments and at different stress ratios. Int J Fatigue. 2013;65:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.10.003
146.
El HaddadMHTopperTHSmithKN.Prediction of non propagating cracks. Eng Fract Mech. 1979;11(3):573–584. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X
147.
ZhouSTurnbullA.Influence of pitting on the fatigue life of a turbine blade steel. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1999;22(12):1083–1093. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00226.x
148.
BerettaSCarboniMFioreG, et al. Corrosion-fatigue of A1N railway axle steel exposed to rainwater. Int J Fatigue. 2010;32(6):952–961. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.08.003
149.
LarrosaNOChapettiMDAinsworthRA.Assessing fatigue endurance limit of pitted specimens by means of an integrated fracture mechanics approach. ASME 2015 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2015 (Vol. 45562),
Boston
; 2015.
150.
LarrosaNOChapettiMDAinsworthRA.Fatigue life estimation of pitted specimens by means of an integrated fracture mechanics approach. In ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2016 (Vol. 63888),
Vancouver
; 2016.
151.
SchönbauerBMYanaseKEndoM.The influence of various types of small defects on the fatigue limit of precipitation-hardened 17-4PH stainless steel. Theor Appl Fract Mec. 2017;87:35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.10.003
152.
LishchukSVAkidRWordenK, et al. A cellular automaton model for predicting intergranular corrosion. Corr Sci. 2011;53(8):2518–2526. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.04.027
153.
GangloffRPDuquetteDJ, Corrosion fatigue of metals: a survey of recent advances and issues. In: Latanision LR, Jones RH, editors. Chemistry and physics of fracture. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987. p. 612–645.
154.
AkidRDmytrakhIM.Influence of surface deformation and electrochemical variables on corrosion and corrosion fatigue crack development. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1998;21:903–911. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00074.x
155.
GutmanEM.Mechanochemistry of materials. Cambridge: Cambridge International Science Publishing; 1998.
156.
GutmanEMSolovioffGEliezerD.The mechanochemical behavior of type 316L stainless steel. Corr Sci. 1996;38(7):1141–1145. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(96)00008-X
157.
LiuYMahadevanS.Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw size distribution. Int J Fatigue. 2009;31:476–487. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.005
158.
RajasankarJIyerNR.A probability-based model for growth of corrosion pits in aluminium alloys. Eng Fract Mech. 2006;73(5):553–570. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.10.001
159.
WolframS.Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Rev Mod Phys. 1983;55:601–644. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.55.601
160.
ChenHChenYZhangJ.Cellular automaton modeling on the corrosion/oxidation mechanism of steel in liquid metal environment. Prog Nucl Energ. 2008;50:587–593. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.044
161.
Cordoba-TorresPNogueiraRPde MirandaL, et al. Cellular automaton simulation of a simple corrosion mechanism: mesoscopic heterogeneity versus macroscopic homogeneity. Electrochim Acta. 2001;4:2975–2989. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00524-2
162.
diCaprioDVautrin-UlCStafiejJ, et al. Morphology of corroded surfaces: contribution of cellular automaton modelling. Corr Sci. 2011;53:418–425. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.052
163.
LeiLXiaogangLChaofangL, et al. Cellular automata modeling on pitting current transients. Electrochim Commun. 2009;11:1826–1829. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.07.027
164.
OssaiCIBoswellBDaviesIJ.Pipeline failures in corrosive environments – A conceptual analysis of trends and effects. Eng Fail Anal. 2015;53:36–58. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.004
165.
TakafujiFCMartinsCA.Comparison of different approaches for fatigue damage accumulation in steel risers. ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2011 (Vol. 49888),
Rotterdam
; 2011.
166.
API RP 17B. Recommended practice for flexible pipe. 2nd ed.
Washington
: American Petroleum Institute; 2008.
167.
Det Norske Veritas (DNV). Recommended practice DNV-RP-C203: Fatigue design of offshore steel structures.
Hovik, Norway
; 2010.
168.
Det Norske Veritas (DNV). Recommended practice DNV-RP-F204-Riser fatigue.
Hovik, Norway
; 2005.
169.
MillsTProst-DomaskySHoneycuttK.3 – Corrosion and the threat to aircraft structural integrity. In: SamuelB, editor. Corrosion control in the aerospace industry.
Cambridge
: Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering, Woodhead Publishing; 2009. p. 35–66.
170.
HoeppnerDW.Parameters that input to application of damage tolerance concepts to critical engine components. AGARD conference proceedings 1985, No. 393, p. 4-1–4-16.
171.
CrawfordBRLoaderCSharpPK.Overview of USTO's past and future research into corrosion structural integrity. AIAC14: Fourteenth Australian Aeronautical Conference. Royal Aeronautical Society, Australian Division; Engineers Australia; 2011, p. 458.
172.
MillsTSharpPKLoaderC.The incorporation of pitting corrosion damage into F-111 fatigue life modelling. No. DSTO-RR-0237. Defence Science and Technology Organisation Canberra,
Australia
; 2002.
173.
MillsTBHoneycuttKTBrooksCLSharpPKLoaderCCrawfordB.Development and demonstration of an holistic structural integrity process using the initial discontinuity state concept for 7050-T7451 aluminum. USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference,
Memphis, TN, USA
; 2004.
174.
CrawfordBRSharpRK.Equivalent crack size modelling of corrosion pitting in an AA7050-T7451 aluminum alloy and its implications for aircraft structural integrity. Air Vehicles Division Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia, Technical Report (ADA567981); 2012.
175.
MadsenJSAnagnostouELEngelSJHoitsmaDHNardielloJAPapazianJM.Overview of the DARPA structural integrity prognosis system (SIPS). Proceedings of 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 2010.
176.
BamfordWH.Technical basis for revised reference crack growth rate curves for pressure boundary steels in LWR environment. J Press Vess-T ASME. 1980;102(4):433–442. doi: 10.1115/1.3263355
177.
SeifertHPRitterS.Environmentally-assisted cracking in austenitic light water reactor structural materials. Final report of the KORA-I project. No. PSI–09-03. Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI); 2009.
178.
TiceDPlattsNRigbyKStairmandJSwanD.Influence of PWR primary coolant environment on corrosion fatigue crack growth of austenitic stainless steel. ASME 2005 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2005 (Vol. 71563),
Denver
; 2005.
LindaEDMetelitsaABardenJLMellishMLMurphyBTHojjatiBGrossPZaretskayaVLindstromP.International Energy Outlook 2013 with Projections to 2040 (IEO2013). US DoE.,
Washington, DC
; 2013.
181.
XuSWuXQHanEH, et al. A review of corrosion fatigue of steels for LWR plant in high temperature and high pressure water. Corros Sci Prot Technol. 2007;19(5):345–349.
182.
MohantySMajumdarSNatesanK.A review of stress corrosion cracking/fatigue modeling for light water reactor cooling system components. Technical Report. Argonne National Laboratory Argonne,
IL, USA
; 2012.
183.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components, New York; 2013.
184.
ASME Code Case N-809, Reference Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Curves for Austenitic Stainless Steels in Pressurized Water Reactor Environments, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York; 2015.
185.
EmslieJWatsonCGillC, et al. Temperature and rise time inputs to fatigue crack growth calculations for austenitic stainless steels in a pressurised water reactor environment. Am Soc Mech Eng Pressure Vessels Piping Div (Publication) PVP. 2015;286:81–95.
186.
McDowellDLDunneFPE.Microstructure-sensitive computational modeling of fatigue crack formation. Int J Fatigue. 2010;32(9):1521–1542. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.003
HochhalterJDLittlewoodDJChrist JrRJ, et al. A geometric approach to modeling microstructurally small fatigue crack formation: II. Physically based modeling of microstructure-dependent slip localization and actuation of the crack nucleation mechanism in AA 7075-T651. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2010;18:045004. 33 pp. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/18/4/045004
189.
HochhalterJDLittlewoodDJChrist JrRJ, et al. A geometric approach to modeling microstructurally small fatigue crack formation. III. Development of a semi-empirical model for nucleation. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2011;19:035008. 27 pp. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/19/3/035008
190.
ChanKS.Roles of microstructure in fatigue crack initiation. Int J Fatigue. 2010;32:1428–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.005
191.
WangLDaniewiczSRHorstemeyerMF, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis using crystal plasticity for a parameter study of microstructurally small fatigue crack growth in a AA7075 aluminum alloy. Int J Fatigue. 2009;31:651–658. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.027
192.
LarrosaNONavarroAChavesV.Calculating fatigue limits of notched components of arbitrary size and shape with cracks growing in Mode I. Int J Fatigue. 2015;74:142–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.002
193.
LarrosaNOChavesVNavarroA, et al. Application of the Microstructural Finite Element Alternating Method to assess the impact of specimen size and distributions of contact/residual stress fields on fatigue strength. Comput Struct. 2017;179:15–6. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.10.011
194.
HarlowDGWangMZWeiRP.Statistical analysis of constituent particles in 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006;37:3367–3. doi: 10.1007/BF02586171
195.
RollettADCampmanRSaylorD.Three dimensional microstructures: statistical analysis of second phase particles in AA 7075-T651 Materials Science Forum. Proc. Int. Conf. on Aluminum Alloys (ICAA-10),
Vancouver
; 2006. p. 519–521.
196.
KamoutsiHHaidemenopoulosGNBontozoglouV, et al. Corrosion-induced hydrogen embrittlement in aluminum alloy 2024. Corr Sci. 2006;48(5):1209–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.015
197.
BurnsJTGangloffRP.Effect of low temperature on fatigue crack formation and microstructure-scale growth from corrosion damage in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu. Metall Mater Trans A. 2013;44(5):2083–2105. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1374-3
