This article has two objectives: First, it attempts to provide a framework for understanding capitalism's resilient adaptability through analysing the roles of liberal democracy and ecological environmentalism. Both are conceptualised as capitalism's passive revolutions in response to emerging crises – processes of constituting and reconstituting conditions for production and reproduction. Liberal democracy is seen as a political restructuring strategy aimed at producing social control with less coercive measures as well as depolitising social contradictions and economic crises. Ecological environmentalism is argued to be capitalism's ecological restructuring attempt at the economic level in order to rescue an economic system at an impasse and to resolve the contradictions between production relations/forces and the externalities of production.
Second, the article aims to conduct a critical analysis of what are considered to be passive revolutions taking place within capitalism in order to uncover their hidden mystifications, contradictions and distortions in the promotion of certain policies, practices, values, cognitions and symbols which are considered to be supportive of the existing capitalist political and economic system. The working assumption is that, due to capitalism's modus operandi which is primarily based on capital accumulation, democratic principles and environmental concerns will eventually have to submit to this inherent imperative.
AllenC. (1997). Who needs civil society?Review of African Political Economy, 24(73), 329–337.
2.
ArrighiG. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century. Verso, London.
3.
BarryJ. (1999). Marxism and ecology. In: GambleA.MarshD.TantT. (Eds.), Marxism and Social Science. Macmillan, London, pp. 259–279.
4.
BergerB. (1998). The social roots of prosperity and liberty. Society, 35(3), 44–53.
5.
BlaugM. (1985). Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6.
BookchinM. (1980). Toward an Ecological Society. Black Rose Books, Montréal.
7.
BookchinM. (1989). Remaking Society. Black Rose Books, Montréal.
8.
BottomoreT.HarrisL.KiernanV. G.MilibandR. (1983). A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Blackwell Publisher, Massachusetts.
9.
BowlesS. (1991). What markets can- and cannot-Do. Challenge, 34(4), 11–17.
10.
Buci-GluksmannC. (1979). State, transition and passive revolution. In: MouffeC. (Ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London, pp. 207–236.
11.
BurkettP. (1996). Value, capital and nature: Some ecological implications of Marx's critique of political economy. Science & Society, 60(3), 332–359.
12.
CoxH. (1999). The market as God. The Atlantic Monthly, 283(3), 18–23.
13.
CoxR. W., (1993). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. In: GillS. (Eds.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49–66.
14.
CrawfordG. (2000). Promoting democratic governance in the south. The European Journal of Development Research, 12(1), 23–57.
15.
DoyleT. (1998). Sustainable development and agenda 21: The secular bible of global free markets and pluralist democracy. Third World Quarterly, 19(4), 771–786.
EhrenbergJ. (1995). Class politics and the state: Lenin and the contradictions of socialism. Science & Society, 59(3), 437–463.
18.
FernandoJ. L.HestonA. W. (1997). NGOs between states, markets, and civil society. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 8–20.
19.
FosterJ. B. (1995). Ecology and Human Freedom. Monthly Review, 47(6), 22–33.
20.
FosterJ. B. (1997). Book review of ‘promoting polyarchy: Globalization, US intervention, and hegemony’. Monthly Review, 49(4), 51–62.
21.
FukuyamaF. (1989). The end of history?The National Interest, 16, 3–18.
22.
FukuyamaF. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. Hamish Hamilton, London.
23.
GeorgeS.SabelliF. (1994). Faith and Credit. Penguin Books, London.
24.
GramsciA. (1971). In: HoareQ.SmithG. N. (Eds.), Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrence & Wishart, London.
25.
GreenberyJ. B.ParkT. K. (1994). Political ecology. Journal of Political Economy, 1, 1–12.
26.
GrugelJ. (2000). Romancing civil society: European NGOs in Latin America. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(2), 87–107.
HansenT. B. (1991). Politics and Ideology in Developing Societies: An Exploratory Essay (working paper). Department of Languages and Intercultural Studies, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
29.
HargroveB. (1995). The future of capitalism: Does capitalism represent the best humanity can ever hope to achieve?Monthly Review, 46(8), 1–10.
30.
HavelV, (1988). Anti-political politics. In: DeaneJ. (Ed.), Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives. Verso, London, pp. 381–398.
31.
HeilbronerR. (1995). The nature of economics. Challenge, 38(1), 22–26.
32.
HobsbawmE. J. (1982). Gramsci and Marxist political theory. In: AnneS. S. (Ed.), Approaches to Gramsci. Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative Society, London, pp. 20–36.
33.
HowellJ. (2000). Making civil society from the outside – challenges for donors. The European Journal of Development Research, 12(1), 3–22.
34.
HuntingtonS. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Oklahoma University Press, Norman.
35.
HwangS-U. K. (1999). Ecological panopticism; The problematization of the ecological crisis. College Literature, 26(1), 137–149.
36.
ImH. B. (1991). Hegemony and counter-hegemony in Gramsci. Asian Perspective, 15(1), 123–156.
37.
KovelJ. (1997). The enemy of nature. Monthly Review, 49(6), 6–14.
38.
LiX. (1996). Democracy and human rights: China and the West. Monthly Review, 48(7), 29–40.
39.
MartinJ. (1997). Hegemony and the crisis of legitimacy in Gramsci. History of the Human Sciences, 10(1), 37–56.
40.
MarxK. (1977). Capital I, trans. by FowkesBen. Vintage, New York.
41.
MarxK. (1981). Capital III, trans. by FernbachDavid. Penguin, New York.
42.
MichnikA. (1985). Letters from Prison and Other Essays. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
43.
MiddletonN.O'keefeP.MoyoS. (1993). The Tears of the Crocodile: From Rio to Reality in the Developing World. Pluto Press, London.
44.
OllmanB., (Ed.) (1998). Market mystification in capitalist and market socialist societies. Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists. Boutledge, New York, pp. 81–121.
45.
PatersonM. (1999). Globalization, ecology and resistance. New Political Economy, 4(1), 129–145.
46.
PetrasJ. (1997). Imperialism and NGOs in Latin America. Monthly Review, 49(7), 10–27.
47.
PolanyiK. (1957) [1944]. The Great Transformation. Beacon Press, Boston.
48.
RieffD. (1999). Civil society and the future of the nation-state: Two views. The Nation, 268(7), 11–16.
49.
RobinsonW. I. (1996). Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention, and Hegemony. Cambridge University Press, New York.
50.
RosenbergJ. (1994). The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. Verso, London.
51.
RossR. J. S.TrachteK. C. (1990). Global Capitalism: The New Leviathan. State University of New York, New York.
52.
RuleJ. B. (1998). Market, in their place. Dissent, 45(1), 29–35.
53.
SachsW, (Ed.) (1993). Global ecology and the shadow of development. Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict. Zed Books, London, pp. 3–21.
54.
SassoonA. S. (1982). Passive revolution and the politics of reform. In: AnneS. S. (Ed.), Approaches to Gramsci. Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative Society Ltd, London, pp. 127–148.
55.
ShivaV, (1993). The greening of the global reach. In: SachsW, (Ed.), Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict. Zed Books, London, pp. 149–156.
56.
SimonR. (1982). Gramsci's Political Thought. Lawrence and Wishart, London.
57.
SmithA. (1970–1999). The Wealth of Nations. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
58.
WoodE. M. (1995). Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
59.
WoodE. M. (1999). The Origin of Capitalism. Monthly Review Press, New York.
60.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
