The article sets out a controversial task of looking at the Russian and East Asian episodes of the 1997–98 international financial upheaval. It argues that despite the palpable differences in the economic structures of the two regions, the similarity in the circumstances and aftermaths of the crashes requires a re-conceptualisation of the role of financial capital in framing dependent development patterns in global capitalism. The paper looks at the following issues. First, it discusses the role of domestic monetary policies, external financial openness and export-oriented development strategies in contributing to the crises. Second, the analysis discloses the nature and role of financial indebtedness in the two cases, pointing to the fundamental problem of the finance-real economy disjuncture that had been at the centre of the two crises. Third, the paper reveals the importance and similarity of national politico-economic structures, their links to the world ruling elites in shaping the countries' models of dependent capitalism. The article argues that through a complex multi-level fusion, these factors render current plans to eliminate world inequality and restore world financial stability, largely futile.
ArrighiG. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century. Verso, London.
3.
ArrighiG.SilverB. (2001). Capitalism and world (dis)order. Review of International Studies, 27, 257–279.
4.
ArestisP.GllickmannM. (2002). Financial crisis in Southeast Asia: Dispelling illusion the Minskyan way. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26, 237–260.
5.
AybarS.LapavitsasC. (2001). Financial system design and the post-Washington consensus. In: FineB.LapavitsasC.PincusJ. (Eds.), Development Policy in the Twenty-First Century, Routledge, London and New York.
6.
BernardM. (1999). East Asia's tumbling dominoes: Financial crises and the myth of regional model. Socialist Register. Merlin Press, London.
7.
BirdG.MilneA. (1999). Miracle to meltdown: A pathology of the East Asian financial crisis. Third World Quarterly, 20(2).
8.
BoswellT.Chase-DunnC. (2000). The Spiral of Capitalism and Socialism, Lynne Rienner, London.
9.
BuchsT., (1999). Financial crisis in the Russian Federation. Economics of Transition, 7(3), 687–715.
10.
ButorinaO. (2000). Implications of the Russian Crisis. Post-Communist Economies, 12(4).
11.
CastellsM. (1993). The Informational economy and the new international division of labour. In: CarnoyM.CastellsM.CohenS.CardosoF. (Eds.), The New Global Economy in the Information Age. Macmillan, London.
12.
CernyP. (1994). The infrastructure of infrastructure. In: PalanR.GillsB. (Eds.), Transcending the State-Global Divide. Lynne Publishers, Boulder Co.
13.
ChandrasekharC.GhoshJ. (1998). Hubris, hysteria, hope: The political economy of crisis and response in Southeast Asia. In: JomoK. S. (Ed.), Tigers in Trouble: Financial Governance, Liberalisation and Crises in East Asia. Zed Books, London.
14.
ChossudovskyM. (1997, 1998). The Globalisation of Poverty. Zed Books, London.
15.
CommanderS.MummsenC. (2000). The growth of non-monetary transactions in Russia: Causes and effects. In: SeabrightP. (Ed.), The Vanishing Rouble. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16.
CoxR. (1999). A perspective on globalisation. In: MittlemanJ. (Ed.), Globalisation: Critical Reflections. Lynne Rienner, London.
17.
DerluguianG. (2001). Recasting Russia. New Left Review, 12, November–December.
18.
EatwellJ.TaylorL. (2000). Global Finance at Risk. The Case for International Regulation. Cambridge: Polity Press, Oxford.
19.
The Economist (2000). Putin the great unknown, 8 January, 45.
20.
The Economist (2000). Russia and its neighbours, 30 September 2000, 62.
21.
The Economist (2000). The Russian economy. Boom and gloom, 25 November, 148.
22.
The Economist (2001). The path to Reform–or another dead end? 2 June 2001, 43.
23.
The Economist (2001). Russian reform theory and practice, 7 July 2001, 48.
24.
The Economist (2002). East Asian economies. The lost (half) decade, 6 July 2002, 75–77.
25.
EricsonR. (1999). Comment on an accounting model of Russia's virtual economy. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 40(2).
26.
ErshovM. (2000). Valyutno-Financovye Mechanismy v Sovremennom Mire. Ekonomika, Moscow.
27.
EyalG.SzelenyiI. (1998). Making Capitalism without Capitalists. Verso, New York.
GlazievS. (2000). Vozmozhen li v Rossii novyi finansovyi krisis?Vopsosy Ekonomiki, March.
33.
GodementF. (1999). The Downsizing of Asia. Routledge, London.
34.
GowanP. (1999). The Global Gamble. Washington's Faustian Bid for World Dominance. Verso, London.
35.
GrayJ. (1998). False Down: The Delusions of Global Capitalism. Granta Books, London.
36.
GuttmanR. (1994). How Credit-Money Shapes the World Economy, M. E. Sharpe.
37.
HaleD. (1998). The IMF, now more than ever. Foreign Affairs, 77(6), 7–13.
38.
HarrisL. (1999). Will the real IMF please stand up. In: MichieJ.SmithJ. (Eds.), Global Instability. The Political Economy of World Economic Governance. Routledge, London.
39.
Hart-LandsbergM.BurkettP. (1998). This is no alternative: The Asian crisis and the crisis of development theory. Mimeo.
40.
HarveyD. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity. Blackwell, Cambridge and Oxford.
41.
HarveyD. (1999). The Limits to CapitalVerso, London.
42.
HiggottR.PhillipsN. (2000). The limits of global liberalisation in Asia and Latin America. Review of International Studies, 26(3).
43.
HilferdingR. (1972). Finance Capital. Allen Lane, London.
44.
HirstP.ThomsonG. (1999). Globalisation in Question, Polity Press.
Russian Economic Trends (1998). 7(3), Russian European Centre for Economic Policy, Moscow.
56.
RutlandP. (1999). Mission Impossible? The IMF and the failure of the market transition in Russia. Review of International Studies, 25, 183–200.
57.
SimonovV.KyharevA. (1998). Perspectives of the development of the Russian government debt market. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 11.
58.
SmithinJ.WolfB. (1999). A world central bank? In: MichieJ.SmithJ. (Eds.), Global Instability. The Political Economy of World Economic Governance, Routledge, London.
59.
SnooksG. (2000). The Global Crisis Makers. Macmillan Press.
60.
SoederbergS. (2002). New international financial architecture: Imposed leadership on emerging markets. Socialist Register.
61.
SorosG. (1998/99). Capitalism's last chance?Foreign Policy, 113.
62.
StiglitzJ. (1998). The role of international financial institutions in the current global economy, address to the Chicago Council of Foreign Relations, Chicago. www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/extme/jssp022798.htm.
63.
StrangeS. (1997). Casino Capitalism. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
64.
StrangeS. (1998). Mad Money. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
65.
SumN.-L. (1999). A material-discursive approach to the ‘Asian Crisis’: The breaking and remaking of the production and financial orders. In: MasinoP. (Ed.), Rethinking Development in East Asia. Curzon Press, London.
66.
SurinK. (1998). Dependency theory reanimation in the era of financial capital. Cultural Logic, 1(2).
67.
TabbW. (1998). The East Asian financial crisis. Monthly Review, June.
68.
UnderhillG., (Ed) (1997). The New World Order In International Finance. Macmillan, London.
