Overview of Psychiatric Ethics V: Utilitarianism and the Ethics of Duty

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to describe the ethical theories of utilitarianism and the ethics of duty (Kant's ethics) and to evaluate their value as theoretical bases of psychiatric ethics.

Conclusions: Utilitarianism is a well-established moral philosophy and has significant instrumental value in dealing with common ethical problems faced by psychiatrists. Despite its capacity to generate solutions to ethical problems, utilitarianism requires a process of what Rawls described as ‘reflective equilibrium’ to avoid morally repugnant choices, based on utility. The criticisms of utilitarianism, such as the problems of quantifying utility and the responsibility for consequences, are very relevant for psychiatry. Singer's model of utilitarian thinking is particularly problematic for our profession. Kant's ethics provides the pretext for duty bound codes of ethics for psychiatrists, but suffers from problems of flawed claims to the universalizability prescribed by Kant's ‘categorical imperative’. Kant's valorization of reason as the core of the autonomy of persons is a valuable insight in understanding psychiatrists’ ethical obligations to their patients.

Keywords

autonomy deontology Kant psychiatric ethics utilitarianism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Epicurus. Letter to Menoeceus. In:. Cooper

,The Extant Remains. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1926; 47–58.

2. Kymlicka

. Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York 2002.

3. Singer

. The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York 1981.

4. Bentham

. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Althone Press, London 1970.

5. Mill

. Utilitarianism, Liberty, Representative Government. JM Dent and Sons, London 1968.

6. Mill

. On Liberty. WW Norton, New York 1859/1975.

7. Sidgwick

. The Methods of Ethics7th edn. Macmillan, London 1907.

8. Smart

JJC

. Act-utilitarianism and Rule-utilitarianism. Utilitarianism: For and Against, Smart

JJC

Williams

. Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge 1973; 9–12.

9. Moore

. Principia Ethica. Prometheus Books, Amherst 1903/1988.

10.

10. Hare

. Moral Thinking. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1981.

11.

11. Hare

. Freedom and Reason. Oxford University Press, London 1963.

12.

12. Hare

. Could Kant have been a utilitarian?. Sorting Out Ethics, Hare

. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000; 147–191.

13.

13. Hare

. The Philosophical Basis of Psychiatric Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York 1993.

14.

14. Popper

. The Open Society and its Enemies. Princeton University Press, Princeton 1945.

15.

15. ‘DP’. The pin-prick argument. In:, Utilitarianism Resources:. http://www.utilitarianism.com/pinprick-argument.html (accessed 14 October 2006). 2006.

16.

16. Smart

. Negative utilitarianism. Mind 1958; 67: 542–543.

17.

17. Singer

. Practical Ethics2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993.

18.

18. Singer

Kuhse

. Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants. Oxford University Press, New York 1985.

19.

19. Williams

. A critique of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism: For and Against, Smart

JJC

Williams

. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1973; 75–150.

20.

20. Elster

. Utilitarianism and the genesis of wants. Utilitarianism and Beyond, Sen

Williams

. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1982; 219–238.

21.

21. Harsanyi

. Rational Behaviour and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1976.

22.

22. Goodin

. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995.

23.

23. Hare

. The Language of Morals. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1952.

24.

24. Hare

. A philosophical self portrait. The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy, Mautner

. Penguin, London 1997; 234–235.

25.

25. Kant

. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Harper and Row, New York 1964.

26.

26. Beauchamp

Childress

. Principles of Biomedical Ethics5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York 2001.

27.

27. Foot

. Abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review 1967; 5: 28–41.

28.

28. Boyle

. Who is entitled to the double effect?. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1991; 16: 475–494.

29.

29. Sprigge

. A utilitarian reply to Dr McCloskey. Inquiry 1965; 8: 264–291.

30.

30. Nagel

. The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press, New York 1986.

31.

31. Brink

. Utilitarian morality and the personal point of view. Journal of Philosophy 1986; 83: 417–438.

32.

32. Sen

. Rights and agency. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1982; 11: 3–39.

33.

33. Rawls

. A Theory of Justice. The Bellknap Press, Cambridge, MA 1971.

34.

34. Railton

. Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1984; 13: 134–171.

35.

35. Smart

JJC

. Utilitarianism and the future. Utilitarianism: For and Against, Smart

JJC

Williams

. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1973; 62–67.

36.

36. Robertson

, Walter

. A critical reflection on utilitarianism as the basis for psychiatric ethics I: utilitarianism as an ethical theory. Journal of Ethics and Mental Health. 2007; 1 (in press).

37.

37. Robertson

, Walter

. A critical reflection on utilitarianism as the basis for psychiatric ethics II: utilitarianism and psychiatry. Journal of Ethics and Mental Health. 2007; 1 (in press).

38.

38. Bloch

. Abuses in psychiatry. Encyclopaedia of Bioethics, Reich

. Macmillan, New York 1995; 2126–2132.

39.

39. Strous

. Psychiatry during the Nazi era: ethical lessons for the modern professional. Annals of General Psychiatry, 1007; 6: 8.

40.

40. Singh

Hawthorne

Vos

. The role of economic evaluation in mental health care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 35: 104–117.

41.

41. Murray

Lopez

. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality And Disability From Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank, Washington, DC 1996.

42.

42. Williams

. Ethics and efficiency in the provision of health care. Philosophy and Medical Welfare, Bell

Mendus

. Cambridge University Press, New York 1988; 111–126.

43.

43. Singer

McKie

Kuhse

Richardson

. Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995; 21: 144–150.

44.

44. Chisholm

Healy

Knapp

. QALYs and mental health care. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1997; 32: 68–75.

45.

45. Bloch

Pargiter

. A history of psychiatric ethics. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2002; 25: 509–524.

46.

46. Adshead

. Care or custody? Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry. Journal of Medical Ethics 2000; 26: 302–304.

47.

47. Welsh

Deahl

. Modern psychiatric ethics. The Lancet 2002; 359: 253–255.

48.

48. Halleck

. The ethical dilemmas of forensic psychiatry: a utilitarian approach. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 1984; 12: 279–288.

49.

49. Dyer

. Ethics and Psychiatry: Toward a Professional Definition. American Psychiatric Press, New York 1988.

50.

50. Green

Bloch

. Working in a flawed mental healthcare system: an ethical challenge. American Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1378–1383.

51.

51. Kant

. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Gregor

(Transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

52.

52. Kant

. Critique of Practical Reason. Greogor

(Transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

53.

53. Kant

. The Metaphysics of Morals. Gregor

(Transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

54.

54. O'Neill

. Kantian Ethics. A Companion to Ethics, Singer

. Blackwell, Oxford 1991; 175–185.

55.

55. Hill

. Humanity as an end in itself. Ethics 1980–81; 91: 84–89.

56.

56. Arendt

. Eichmann in Jerusalem: a Report on the Banality of Evil. Faber & Faber, London 1963.

57.

57. Baron

. Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology. Cornell University Press, London 1995.

58.

58. Wakefield

. Aristotle as sociobiologist: The “function of a human being” argument, black box essentialism, and the concept of mental disorder. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 2000; 7: 17–44.

59.

59. Megone

. Aristotle's function argument and the concept of mental illness. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 1998; 5: 187–201.

60.

60. Patfield

. The mentally disordered provisions of the New South Wales Mental Health Act (1990): their ethical standing and the effect on services. Australasian Psychiatry 2006; 14: 263–267.

61.

61. Robertson

. Mad or bad, have we been had? A response to Patfield (Letter). Australasian Psychiatry 2007; 15: 77–79.

62.

62. Wakefield

. The concept of mental disorder: on the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 1992; 47: 373–388.

63.

63. Wakefield

. Disorder as harmful dysfunction: a conceptual critique of DSM-III-R's definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review 1992; 99: 23–39.

64.

64. Campbell

. The virtues (and vices) of the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003; 29: 292–296.

65.

65. Hartley

. The Go-between. New York Review Books Classics, New York 1953.

66.

66. Bardy

. Overview of lymphomas. In:. The Real Issue. An Overview of Lymphomas in AustraliaLeukaemia Foundation's National Medical Advisory Committee and the Lymphoma Support and Research Association. http://public.roche-oncologyhaematology.com.au/downloads/lymphoma-report (accessed 10 April 2007).

67.

67. Mathers

. Health System Costs of Cancer in Australia 1993–94: An Analysis of Costs, Service Use, Incidence and Mortality By Type of Cancer. Health and Welfare Expenditure Series, No. 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra 1998.