Comparing Traditional Journal Writing with Journal Writing Shared over E-mail List Serves as Tools for Facilitating Reflective Thinking: A Study of Preservice Teachers
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2007
Comparing Traditional Journal Writing with Journal Writing Shared over E-mail List Serves as Tools for Facilitating Reflective Thinking: A Study of Preservice Teachers
To determine the conditions that would best encourage reflection in journal writing of preservice teachers in field-based reading internships, the degree of reflective content found in self-contained traditional journals was compared to the reflective content found in journal entries shared over e-mail list serves. Participants were 56 preservice teachers enrolled in reading internships in public schools operating in a variety of journal writing conditions in 1 of 5 semesters from fall 1999 through spring 2001. Results indicate that journals written under shared interactive e-mail conditions were significantly more likely to contain evidence of reflections than traditional journals. Reflections observed were also categorized into types described by Hatton and Smith (1995). Suggestions for implications for encouraging reflectivity during field-based internships in teacher education programs are presented.
References
1.
AtwellN. (1998). In the middle (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
2.
BainJ. D.MillsC.BallantyneR.PackerJ. (2002). Developing reflection on practice through journal writing: Impacts of variations in the focus and level of feedback. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 171–196.
3.
BloemP. L. (2004). Correspondence journals: Talk that matters. Reading Teacher, 58, 54–62.
4.
CruickshankD. R. (1987). Reflective teaching. Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.
5.
DartB. C.Boulton-LewisG. M.BrownleeJ. M.McCrindleA. R. (1998). Change in knowledge of learning and teaching through journal writing. Research Papers in Education, 13, 291–318.
6.
DavisE. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301.
7.
DickerM. (1990). Using action research to navigate an unfamiliar teaching assignment. Theory into Practice, 29(3), 203–208.
8.
EdwardsA. (1995). Teacher education: Partnerships in pedagogy?Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 595–610.
9.
GarmonM. A. (2001). The benefits of dialogue journals: What prospective teachers say. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(4), 37–50.
10.
GipeJ. P.RichardsJ. C. (1992). Reflective thinking and growth in novices' teaching abilities. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 52–57.
11.
GoodJ. M.WhangP. A. (2002). Encouraging reflection in preservice teachers through response journals. The Teacher Educator, 37, 254–267.
12.
GravesD. H.KittleP. (2005). Inside writing: How to teach the details of craft. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13.
HarringtonH. L.HathawayR. S. (1994). Computer conferencing, critical reflection, and teacher development. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10, 543–554.
14.
HattonN.SmithD. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11, 33–49.
15.
HensonR. K.WoodsB. S.GroceE. C. (1999). The examination of preservice teachers' journals for reflective thought patterns concerning professionalism. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada (19–23 April 1999).
HuckS. W. (2000). Types of samples. In HuckS. W. (Ed.), Reading statistics and research (3rd ed., pp. 117–126). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
18.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
19.
KaplanD. S. (2001). Preservice reading teachers' self-awareness of past learning and development as motivation for continued learning. In HoffmanJ.SchallertD.FairbanksC.WorthyJ.MalochB. (Eds.), 50th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 300–310). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
20.
KaplanD. S. (2001). Fostering student reflection and interaction during reading internships through journal writing in e-mail list serves. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX (4–7 December 2001).
21.
KaplanD. S. (2003). Self-awareness of past learning and development as motivation for continued learning: The application of a general model to specific categories of literacy learning for preservice teachers. Reading Psychology, 24(1), 1–24.
22.
KorthagenF. A. J. (1999). Linking reflection and technical competence: The logbook as an instrument in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22, 191–207.
23.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
MaasJ. (1991). Writing and reflecting in teacher education. In TabachnickB. R.ZeichnerK. M. (Eds.), Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education (pp. 211–225). London: Falmer.
25.
McLeanB.WhalleyJ. (2004). No real tale has a beginning or an end … Exploring the relationship between co-supervision, reflective dialogue and psychotherapeutic work with mental health service users. Reflective Practice, 5, 225–238.
26.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Sampling: Bounding the collection of data. In MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (Eds.), Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed., pp. 27–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
MilnerR. H. (2003). Reflection, racial competence, and critical pedagogy: How do we prepare preservice teachers to pose tough questions?Race Ethnicity and Education, 6, 193–208.
28.
National Writing Project, & Nagin, C. (2006). Because writing matters: Improving student writing in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Orland-BarakL. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of reflective practice: What remains “untold”. Educational Research, 47(1), 125–144.
30.
RiskoV. J.RoskosK.VukelichC. (2002). Prospective teachers' reflection: Strategies, qualities, and perceptions in learning to teach reading. Reading, Research and Instruction, 41, 149–176.
31.
RoeM. F.StallmanA. C. (1994). A comparative study of dialogue and response journals. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 579–588.
32.
SchlagalB.TrathenW.BlantonW. (1996). Structuring telecommunications to create instructional conversations about student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 175–183.
33.
SchommerM.WalkerK. (1997). Epistemological beliefs and valuing school: Considerations for college admissions and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38(2), 173–186.
34.
SchonD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
35.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
36.
SmythJ. (1992). Teachers' work and the politics of reflection. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 267–300.
37.
SpaldingE.WilsonA. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers College Record, 104, 1393–1421.
38.
Sparks-LangerG. M.SimmonsJ. M.PaschM.ColtonA.StarkoA. (1990). Reflective pedagogical thinking: How can we promote it and measure it?Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 23–32.
39.
StahlhutR. G.HawkesR. R. (1997). An examination of reflective thinking through a study of written journals, telecommunications, and personal conferences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Teacher Educators, Washington, DC (15–19 February 1997).
40.
SullivanJ. (1998). The electronic journal: Combining literacy and technology. The Reading Teacher, 52, 90–96.
ThomasL.CliftR. T.SugimotoT. (1996). Telecommunication, student teaching, and methods instruction: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 165–174.
43.
ValliL. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 67–88.
44.
Van ManenM. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205–228.
45.
WerderichD. E. (2002). Individualized responses: Using journal letters as a vehicle for differentiated reading instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 746–754.
46.
WhippJ. (2000). Supporting preservice teacher thinking about their field experiences: Critical inquiry in cyberspace. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (24–28 April 2000).
47.
WolffeR. J.McMullenD. W. (1996). The constructivist connection: Linking theory, best practice, and technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 12(2), 25–28.
48.
YostD. S.SentnerS. M.Forlenza-BaileyA. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39–49.
49.
ZeichnerK. M. (1996). Teachers as reflective practitioners and the Democratization of school reform. In ZeichnerK. M.MelnickS.GomezM. L. (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 199–214). New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
ZeichnerK. M.ListonD. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 23–48.
51.
ZeichnerK. M.TabachnickB. R. (1991). Reflections on reflective teaching. In TabachnickB. R.ZeichnerK. M. (Eds.), Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education (pp. 1–21). London: Falmer.
