This short-term longitudinal study investigated the relationships between students' reading self-concept, goals for reading, and reading fluency skill over the course of the second grade year. Second-grade children (N = 185) were administered the Test of Word Reading Efficiency, the second-grade Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills, and an adapted version of Motivation to Read Profile at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year. Results showed that students' goals for reading were related to reading self-concept, but unrelated to reading fluency. In addition, reading self-concept was significantly related to reading fluency at each time point. Latent-variable path analysis was used to test four potential relationships between students' reading self-concept and reading fluency skill: (a) an independence model, (b) a skill development model, (c) a self-enhancement model, and (d) a reciprocal effects model. Support for a reciprocal model was found between students' reading fluency skill and reading self-concept over the second grade year. This finding also indicated that students' reading self-concept begins to influence their reading achievement earlier than previous research had indicated. Implications for educational practice and future research will also be discussed.
References
1.
AndersonR. C.WilsonP. T.FieldingL. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly,23, 285–303.
2.
AunolaK.LeskinenE.Onatsu-ArvilommiT.NurmiJ. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: A case of reading skills and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology,72, 343–364.
3.
BakerL.ScherD. (2002). Beginning readers' motivation for reading in relation to parental beliefs and home reading experiences. Reading Psychology,23, 239–269.
4.
BearD. R. (1992). The prosody of word reading and stages of word knowledge. In TempletonS.BearD. R. (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 137–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BongM.SkaalvikE. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?Educational Psychology Review,15, 1–40.
6.
BrophyJ. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist,40, 167–176.
7.
CalsynR. J.KennyD. A. (1977). Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: Cause or effect of academic achievement?Journal of Educational Psychology,69, 136–145.
8.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (1995). Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,87, 154–167.
9.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (1997). A longitudinal study of beginning reading achievement and reading self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology,67, 279–291.
10.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading and Writing Quarterly,19, 5–24.
11.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E.ProchnowJ. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology,92, 703–708.
12.
DempsterA. P.LairdN. M.RubinD. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,39, 1–38.
13.
EcclesJ. S.AdlerT. F.FuttermanR.GoffS. B.KaczalaC. M.MeeceJ. L. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
14.
ElliotA. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist,34, 169–189.
15.
GambrellL. B.PalmerB. M.CodlingR. M.MazzoniS. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher,49, 518–533.
16.
GeigerJ. F.MillisK. K. (2004). Assessing the impact of reading goals and text structures on comprehension. Reading Psychology25, 93–110.
17.
Georgia Office of Student Achievement. (2004). 2003–2004 annual report cards on K-12 public schools. Retrieved December 1, 2004, from http://reportcard.gaosa.org/yr2004/k12.
18.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52, 890–898.
19.
GuayF.MarshH. W.BoivinM. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 124–136.
20.
GuthrieJ. T.WigfieldA.MetsalaJ. L.CoxK. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading,3, 231–256.
21.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.PintrichP. R.ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 638–645.
22.
HarterS. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development,53, 87–97.
23.
HelmkeA.van AkenM. A. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology,87, 624–637.
24.
HidiS. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research,60, 549–571.
25.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6, 1–55.
26.
HullemanC. S.DurikA. M.SchweigertS. A.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 398–416.
KaminskiR. A.GoodR. H.III (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 113–142). New York: The Guilford Press.
30.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
31.
KuhnM. R.SchwanenflugelP. (2006). All oral reading practice is not equal or how can I integrate fluency into my classroom. Literacy Teaching and Learning,11, 1–20.
32.
KuhnM. R.StahlS. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 3–21.
33.
Kurtz-CostesB. E.SchneiderW. (1994). Self-concept, attributional beliefs, and school achievement: A longitudinal analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology,19, 199–216.
34.
LepolaJ.PoskipartaE.LaakkonenE.NiemiP. (2005). Development of and relationship between phonological and motivational processes and naming speed in predicting word recognition in grade 1. Scientific Studies of Reading,9, 367–399.
35.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1994). Goal setting theory. In O'NielH. F.Jr.DrillingsM. (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 13–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36.
MaehrM. (1989). Thoughts about motivation. In AmesC.AmesR. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 299–315). New York: Academic.
37.
MarshH. W. (1990). The causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 646–656.
38.
MarshH. W.ByrneB. M.YeungA. S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist,34, 154–157.
39.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 133–163.
40.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G.DebusR. (1991). Self-concepts of young children 5 to 8 years of age: Measurement and multidimensional structure. Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 377–392.
41.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G.DebusR. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children's self-concepts: A multicohort-multioccasion study. Child Development,69, 1030–1053.
42.
MarshH. M.KollerO. (2004). Unification of theoretical models of academic self-concept/achievement relations: Reunification of east and west German schools after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Contemporary Educational Psychology,29, 264–282.
43.
MarshH. M.YeungA. S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 41–54.
44.
McKennaM. C.KearD. J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher,43, 626–639.
45.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.WorthyM. J. (1993). Grappling with text ideas: Questioning the author. The Reading Teacher,46, 560–566.
46.
MillerJ.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology,98, 839–853.
47.
MillerJ.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly,43, 336–354.
48.
MorganP. L.FuchsD. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation?Council for Exceptional Children,73, 165–183.
49.
MorroneA. S.SchutzP. A. (2000). Promoting achievement motivation. In MinkeK. M.BearG. G. (Eds.), Preventing school problems—promoting school success: Strategies and programs that work (pp. 143–170). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
50.
MorrowL. M. (1992). The impact of a literature-based program on literacy achievement, use of literature, and attitudes of children from minority backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly,27, 250–275.
51.
MuijsR. D. (1997). Predictors of academic achievement and academic self-concept: A longitudinal perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology,67, 263–277.
52.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: NICHD Clearinghouse.
53.
NewmanR. S. (1984). Children's achievement and self-evaluations in mathematics: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology,76, 857–873.
54.
Onatsu-ArvilommiT.NurmiJ. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task-focused behaviors in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology,92, 478–491.
55.
QuirkM.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2004). Do supplemental remedial reading programs address the motivational issues of struggling readers? An analysis of five popular programs. Reading Research and Instruction,43, 1–19.
56.
RosenblattL. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory into Practice,21, 268–277.
57.
SamuelsS. J.FlorR. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading, Reading and Writing Quarterly,13, 107–122.
58.
SchiefeleU. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist,26, 299–323.
59.
SchumakerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60.
SchunkD. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly,19, 159–172.
61.
SchwanenflugelP. J.HamiltonA. M.KuhnM. R.WisenbakerJ.StahlS. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology,96, 119–129.
62.
SchwanenflugelP. J.KuhnM. R.MorrisR. D.MorrowL. M.MeisingerE. B.WooD. G. (in press). Insights into fluency instruction: Short- and long-term effects of two reading programs. Literacy Research and Instruction.
63.
SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B.WisenbakerJ. M.KuhnM. R.StraussG. P.MorrisR. D. (2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly,41, 496–522.
64.
ShavelsonR. J.BolusR. (1982). Self concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 3–17.
65.
SkaalvikE. M.HagtvetK. A. (1990). Academic achievement and self-concept: An analysis of causal predominance in a developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58, 292–307.
66.
SkaalvikE. M.ValasH. (1999). Relations among achievement, self-concept, and motivation in mathematics and language arts: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Experimental Education,67, 135–149.
67.
Spear-SwerlingL.SternbergR. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model for reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities,27, 91–103.
68.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly,21, 360–407.
69.
StanovichK. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
70.
SweetA. P.GuthrieJ. T.NgM. M. (1998). Teacher perceptions of student reading motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 210–223.
71.
TaylorB.FryeB.MaruyamaG. (1990). Time spent reading and reading growth. American Educational Research Journal,27, 351–362.
72.
TobiasS. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research,64, 37–54.
73.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR.RashotteC. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
74.
UnrauN. J.SchlackmanJ. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research,100, 81–101.
75.
ValentineJ. C.DuBoisD. L. (2005). Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice versa: Separating the chicken from the egg. In MarshH. W.CravenR. G.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.), New frontiers for self-research (pp. 53–77). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
76.
ValentineJ. C.DuBoisD. L.CooperH. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist,39, 111–133.
77.
Van YperenN. (2003). Task interest and actual performance: The moderating effects of assigned and adopted purpose goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85, 1006–1015.
78.
WigfieldA. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist,32, 59–68.
79.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.YoonK. S.HaroldR. D.ArbretonA. J.Freedman-DoanC. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 451–469.
80.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 420–432.
81.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ. T.McGoughK. (1996). A questionnaire measure of children's motivations for reading. (Instructional Resource No. 22). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, Universities of Georgia and Maryland College Park.
82.
YudowitchS.HenryL. M.GuthrieJ. T. (2008). Self-efficacy: Building confident readers. In GuthrieJ. (Ed.), Engaging adolescents in reading (pp. 65–86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
