BloomB., “Learning for Mastery,”Evaluation Comment, 1:2, May 1968, 1–12.
2.
CarrollJ., “A Model of School Learning,”Teachers College Record, 64, 1963, 723–733.
3.
CaseR., “Gearing the Demands of Instruction to the Developmental Capacities of the Learner,”Review of Educational Research, 45, Winter 1975, 59–87.
4.
ChomskyN., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1965.
5.
FriesC., Linguistics and Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1962.
6.
GatesA., The Improvement of Reading. New York: Macmillan, 1927.
7.
GoodmanK., “The Reading Process: A Psycholinguistic View,”Language and Thinking in the Elementary School. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1970.
8.
JonesR., Fantasy and Feeling in Education. New York: New York University, 1968.
9.
KruglanskiA.W.FriedmanI.ZeeviG., “The Effects of Extrinsic Incentives on Some Qualitative Aspects of Task Performance,”Journal of Personality, 39, 1971, 606–617.
10.
NotzW., “Work Motivation and the Negative Effects of Extrinsic Rewards,”American Psychologist, September 1975, 884–891.
11.
RussellD., “Reading Research That Makes a Difference,”Elementary English, 38, 1961, 74–78.
12.
SingerH.“Research That Should Have Made a Difference,”Elementary English, XLVII: 1, January 1970, 27–35.
13.
SingerH., “Theories, Models and Strategies for Learning to Read,” in The Literature of Research in Reading with Emphasis on Models, DavisFred, editor. U.S. Office of Education, 1970, 115–139.
14.
SkinnerB.F., “The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching,”Harvard Education Review, 24, 1954, 86–97.
15.
SmithF., Comprehension and Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1975.
16.
StichtT. (editor) Reading for Working. Alexandria, Virginia: Human Resources Research Organization, 1975.
17.
TermanL.M.LimaM., Children's Reading, New York: Appleton, 1929.
18.
WittrockM.C.DoctorowM.MarksC., Generative Processes in Reading Comprehension. Los Angeles: UCLA, 1977.