In the present study, the role of cultural background knowledge on the reading comprehension of third graders acquiring literacy in Dutch as a first and second language is examined while the children read noncontrived texts from the reading curricula. Children were given three types of texts: texts referring to Dutch culture, texts referring to the cultures of immigrants from Near Eastern countries (i.e., Turkey and Morocco), and neutral texts. Within each type of text, a distinction was made between two levels of linguistic complexity. By means of reading-aloud protocols, retelling and questioning the children's reading performance on the distinguished types of texts was analyzed. A facilitating effect of cultural familiarity was found for both reading comprehension and reading efficiency. For the minority children, this effect was restricted to linguistically simple texts, because of their limited knowledge of the target language, Dutch.
References
1.
AdamsB. CBellL. CPerfettiC. A. (1995). A trading relationship between reading skill and domain knowledge in children's text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 307–323.
2.
AndersonR. CPearsonP. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of reading comprehension. In PearsonP. D. (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255–291). New YorkLongman.
3.
AuK. H. (1993). Literacy instruction in multicultural settings. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
4.
BernhardtE. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
BiigelK.BuunkB. P. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 80 (1), 15–30.
6.
DavisonA.GreenG. M. (Eds.). (1988). Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
DroopM.VerhoevenL. (1996). Linguistic and cultural diversity and reading comprehension development. In LeuD. J.KinzerC. K.HinchmanK. A. (Eds.), Literacies for the 21st century: Research and practice. Forty-fifth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 317–328). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
8.
Fincher-KieferR. (1992). The role of prior knowledge processing in inferential processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 15 (1), 12–27.
9.
GarciaG. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26,371–392.
10.
GoodmanK. S. (1969). Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly, 5, 9–30.
11.
HoffmanJ. V.McCartheyS. J.AbbottJ.ChristianCCormanL.CurryCDressmanM.ElliottM.MatherneD.StableD. (1994). So what's new in the new basals? A focus on first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26,47–74.
12.
JohnsonP. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background knowledge of a text, Tesol Quarterly, 15,169–181.
13.
LeeJ. F. (1986). On the use of the recall task to measure l2 reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 201–211.
14.
LipsonM. Y. (1983). The influence of religious affiliation on children's memory for text information. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 448–457.
15.
KerkhoffA.VallenT. (1985). Cultural biases in second language testing of children. In ExtraG.VallenT. (Eds.), Ethnic minorities and Dutch as a second language (pp. 133–145). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
16.
MalikA. A. (1995). A psycholinguistic analysis of the reading behavior of efl-proficient readers using culturally familiar and culturally nonfamiliar expository texts. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 205–223.
17.
MokI.ReinschP. (1993). Op zoek naar een multi-etnisch perspectief: Analyse van een viertal nieuwe aardrijkskunde-methodes [Toward a new multi-ethnic perspective: Analysis of four new geography curricula]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Stichting Parel.
18.
PritchardR. H. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273–295.
19.
ReynoldsR. E.TaylorM. A.SteffensenM. S.ShirleyL. L.AndersonR. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17,353–366.
20.
StahlS. E.HareChou V.SinatraR.GregoryJ. F. (1991). Defining the role of prior knowledge and vocabulary in reading comprehension: The retiring of number 41. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23,478–508.
21.
SteffensenM. S. (1987). The effects of context and culture on children's 1.2 reading: A review. In DevineJ.CarrellP. L.EskeyD. E. (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 43–54). Washington, DC: tesol.
22.
SteffensenM. S.Joag-DevCAndersonR. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15,10–29.
23.
ThorndykeP. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9,77–110.
24.
UiterwijkH. (1994). De bruikbaarheid van de eindtoets basisonderwijs voor allochtone leerlingen [The usefulness of the end of primary school test for ethnic minority children]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: cito.
25.
van der VlerkD. J. (1991). “Wiens geschiedenis?” Over het multi-etnisch gehalte van een nieuwegeneratiegeschiedenismethoden voor de basisschool [Whose history? The multiethnic content of new history curricula for primary school]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Stichting Parel.
26.
VerhoevenL. (1990). Acquisition of reading in a second language. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 90–114.
27.
VerhoevenL. (1994). Transfer in bilingual development: The linguistic interdependence hypothesis revisited. Language Learning, 44,381–415.
28.
WeberR. (1991). Linguistic diversity and reading in American society. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 97119). New York: Longman.
