Reading-Related Literacy Activities of American Adults: Time Spent,Task Types,and Cognitive Skills Used

Abstract

German

Spanish

French

This article presents data on the types and duration of reading-related activities reported by a volunteer sample of 400 adults (demographically similar to the U.S. adult population age 20 and older in terms of race, ethnicity, education, and working status) in the 2005 Real-World Tasks Study. This diary study revealed that adults spent, on average, 4.5 hours a day on activities that involve reading printed and electronic texts, a relatively higher percentage of which occurred on working than on nonworking days. Prose and quantitative tasks were more common (98 and 94 minutes, respectively) than hybrid and document tasks (40 and 25 minutes, respectively). Hybrid tasks constituted 15% of the total daily reading-related literacy time, a novel finding because hybrid tasks have not been defined or included in any previous studies. Most reading-related activities required application skills to act on or use information to function in society and achieve goals (e.g., to decide which health insurance plan to purchase). In terms of texts, adults spent about 191 minutes a day using prose texts but only 116 minutes using document texts. The largest portion of reading-related time of prose texts was spent on periodicals, journals, newspapers, electronic correspondence, and informational texts. Lists accounted for over a fourth of the time spent on activities involving reading document texts. These results have been used in assessment development to ensure that assessment tasks reflect everyday literacy activities. The data may also benefit literacy practitioners in creating materials that reflect adults' daily reading practices.

References

Corti

(1993). Using diaries in social research. Social Research Update, Issue 2. Retrieved August 28, 2004, from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU2.html.

Day

J. C.

Janus

Davis

(2005). Computer and Internet use in the United States: 2003 special studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau.

Guthrie

J. T.

Greaney

(1991). Literacy acts. In Barr

Kamil

M. L.

Mosenthal

P. B.

Pearson

P. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 2 (pp. 68–96). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Guthrie

J. T.

Seifert

(1983). Profiles of reading activity in a community. Journal of Reading, 26, 498–508.

Guthrie

J. T.

Seifert

Kirsch

I. S.

(1986). Effects of education, occupation, and setting on reading practices. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 151–160.

Kaestle

C. F.

(1985). The history of literacy and the history of readers. Review of Research in Education, 12, 11–53.

Kirsch

I. S.

Guthrie

J. T.

(1984). Adult reading practices for work and leisure. Adult Education Quarterly, 34, 213–232.

Kirsch

I. S.

Mosenthal

P. B.

(1990). Exploring document literacy: Variables underlying the performance of young adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 5–30.

Kirsch

Yamamoto

Norris

Rock

Jungeblut

O'Reilly

(2001). Technical report and data file user's manual for the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey (NCES 2001–457). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

10.

McShane

(2005). Applying research in reading instruction for adults: First steps for teachers. Washington, DC: The Partnership for Reading.

11.

Menon

(1997). Are the parts better than the whole? The effects of decompositional questions on judgments of frequent behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 335–346.

12.

Robinson

J. P.

(1980). The changing reading habits of the American public. Journal of Communication, 30(1), 141–152.

13.

Robinson

J. P.

(1985). The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In Juster

F. T.

Stafford

F. P.

(Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 33–62). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

14.

Robinson

J. P.

Godbey

(2000). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

15.

Schwartz

L. K.

(2002). The American time use survey: Cognitive pretesting. Monthly Labor Review, 125(2), 34–44.

16.

Sharon

A. T.

(1973–1974). What do adults read? Reading Research Quarterly 9, 148–169.

17.

Smith

M. C.

(2000). The real-world reading practices of adults. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 25–52.

18.

Smith

M. C.

Stahl

N. A.

(1999). Adults' reading practices and activities: Age, educational and occupational effects. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED450339).

19.

White

Dorman

S. M.

(2000). Confronting information overload. The Journal of School Health, 70(4), 160–161.

20.

White

(2010). Understanding adult functional literacy: Connecting text features, task demands, and respondent skills. New York: Routledge.

21.

White

Cohen

(2010). Document profile and document familiarity index: Tools for building document literacy. Unpublished manuscript.

22.

White

Dillow

(2005). Key concepts and features of the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–471). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.