Narration,argumentation and explanation: a study of the discourse units in spontaneous conversations at mealtimes ( Narración,argumentación y explicación: un estudio de las unidades de discurso en conversaciones espontáneas durante situaciones de comida )
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2020
Narration,argumentation and explanation: a study of the discourse units in spontaneous conversations at mealtimes ( Narración,argumentación y explicación: un estudio de las unidades de discurso en conversaciones espontáneas durante situaciones de comida )
The goal of this article is to contribute to our knowledge of the discursive environment of four-year-old children in which narration, argumentation and explanation occur. Mastery of these discursive forms is a requirement for participating in classroom practices. Even though these discourse units are intertwined in everyday interactions, previous studies prioritized studying them in isolation without examining how they are used together to shape the texture of the conversation. In the study reported here, the structure and interactional prompt of the narrations, explanations and argumentations that occur at mealtimes at home are analysed; specifically, 181 discourse units self-recorded in the homes of 11 four-year-old children from the Argentine middle class were analysed. Differences were found between the units in terms of their frequency, structure (length, presence of embedded units) and interactional prompts, as well as the role of the child when producing them. The potential of mealtime conversations in the acquisition of extended discourse stands out.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlamF.RosembergC. (2014). Narración y disputas entre niños. Un análisis de argumentaciones tempranas. Cogency, 6(1), 9–31.
2.
AntakiC. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organisation of accounts. London: Sage.
3.
ArrúeJ.RosembergC.AlamF. (2014, April). Narraciones en la interacción entre niños pequeños y adultos. Un estudio con niños de sectores medios y niños que viven en poblaciones urbano marginadas. Poster presented at the Tercer Encuentro Nacional de Investigadores en Desarrollo Cognitivo y Educación, Bariloche, Argentina.
4.
AukrustV.SnowC. (1998). Narratives and explanations during mealtime conversations in Norway and the U.S. Language in Society, 27, 221–246.
5.
BassolsM.TorrentA. (1997). Modelos textuales: Teoría y práctica. Barcelona: Octaedro.
BealsD.SnowC. (1994). Mealtime talks that support literacy development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 51–66.
8.
Blum-KulkaS. (2002). Do you believe that Lotís wife is blocking the Road 85 (to Jericho)?: Co-constructing theories about the world with adults. In Blum-KulkaS.SnowC. (Eds.), Talking to adults. The contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition (pp. 85–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Blum-KulkaS.HamoM.HabibT. (2010). Explanations in naturally occurring peer talk: Conversational emergence and function, thematic scope, and contribution to the development of discursive skills. First Language, 30, 440–460.
10.
BovaA. (2015). Children’s responses in argumentative discussions relating to parental rules and prescriptions. Ampersand, 2, 109–121.
11.
BovaA.ArcidiaconoF. (2018). The interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions and topics of disagreement during family conversations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 124–133.
12.
BrunerJ. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21.
13.
BrunerJ. (2010). Narrative, culture and mind. In SchiffrinD.De FinaA.NylundA. (Eds.), Telling stories: Language, narrative and social life (pp. 45–50). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
14.
CastelainT.BernardS.MercierH. (2018). Evidence that two‐year‐old children are sensitive to information presented in arguments. Infancy, 23, 124–135.
EisenbergA. (1987). Learning to argue with parents and peers. Argumentation, 1, 113–125.
17.
ElyR.GleasonJ.MacGibbonA.ZaretskyE. (2001). Attention to language: Lessons learned at the dinner table. Social Development, 10, 355–373.
18.
FivushR.FromhoffF. (1988). Style and structure in mother–child conversations about the past. Discourse Processes, 11, 337–355.
19.
FivushR.HadenE.ReeseC. (2006). Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Development, 77, 1568–1588.
HellerV. (2014). Discursive practices in family dinner talk and classroom discourse: A contextual comparison. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3, 134–145.
22.
HudsonJ. (2002). Do you know what we’re going to do this summer? Mothers’ talk to preschool children about future events. Journal of Cognitive Development, 3, 49–71.
23.
KüntayA.Ervin-TrippS. (1997). Narrative structure and conversational circumstances. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 113–120.
24.
LarsonR.BranscombK.WileyA. (2006). Forms and functions of family mealtimes: Multidisciplinary perspectives. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 1–15.
25.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
MelziG. (2000). Cultural variations in the construction of personal narratives: Central American and European American mother’s elicitation styles. Discourse Processes, 30, 153–177.
MigdalekM.RosembergC.Santibáñez YáñezC. (2014). La génesis de la argumentación. Un estudio con niños de 3 a 5 años en distintos contextos de juego. Íkala, 19, 251–267.
30.
MorekM. (2015). Show that you know – Explanations, interactional identities and epistemic stance-taking in family talk and peer talk. Linguistics and Education, 31, 238–259.
31.
NelsonK. (1996). Language in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
NelsonK. (1999). Event representations, narrative development and internal working models. Attachment & Human Development, 1, 239–252.
33.
PontecorvoC.ArcidiaconoF. (2010). Development of reasoning through arguing in young children. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 19–29.
34.
QuasthoffU.HellerV.MorekM. (2017). On the sequential organization and genre-orientation of discourse units in interaction: An analytic framework. Discourse Studies, 19, 84–110.
35.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromhttps://www.R-project.org/
36.
RaynaudoG.MigdalekM.SantibáñezC. (2018). Argumentos, justificaciones y explicaciones: Un análisis de los actos de dar razones desde la perspectiva del discurso infantil. Lengua y Habla, 22, 226–241.
37.
RosembergC. (2000). El aprendizaje lingüístico y discursivo. La incidencia de la interacción social. Paideia, 4, 85–94.
38.
RosembergC. R.SilvaM. L.SteinA. (2010). Narrativas infantiles en contexto: Un estudio en hogares de barrios urbano marginados de Buenos Aires. Revista del Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Educación, 28, 135–154.
39.
SilvaM.McCabeA. (1996). Vignettes of the continuous and family ties: Some Latino American traditions. In McCabeA. (Ed.), Chameleon readers: Teaching children to appreciate all kinds of good stories (pp. 116–136). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
SnowC.PorcheM.TaborsP.HarrisS. (2007). Is literacy enough? Pathways to academic success for adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
41.
SparksA. (2008). Latino mothers and their preschool children talk about the past: Implications for language and literacy. In McCabeA.BaileyA.MelziG. (Eds.), Spanish-language narration and literacy. Culture, cognition and emotion (pp. 273–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
SteinA. (2015). Narrativas compartidas en el hogar. Un estudio longitudinal de la estructura y el lenguaje evaluativo. Interdisciplinaria, 32, 51–71.
43.
SteinN.AlbroE. (2001). The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation. Discourse Processes, 32, 113–133.
44.
TolchinskyL. (2004). The nature and scope of later language development. In BermanR. (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp. 233–247). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
45.
ToulminS. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
UccelliP. (2009). Emerging temporality: Past tense and temporal/aspectual markers in Spanish-speaking children’s intra-conversational narratives. Journal of Child Language, 36, 929–966.
47.
VenezianoE. (2001). Interactional processes in the origins of the explaining capacity. In NelsonK.Aksu-KocA.JohnsonC. (Eds.), Children’s language, Vol. 10: Language in use, narratives and interactions (pp. 113–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
VenezianoE. (2003). Learning to explain: A specifically pragmatic acquisition. In DrevillonJ.VivierJ.SalinasA. (Eds.), Psycholinguistics, a multidisciplinary science of 2000: What implications, what applications. Paris: Europia.
49.
ZamudioB.AtorresiA. (2000). Enciclopedia semiológica. La explicación. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
