Representativity of a postal public health questionnaire survey in Sweden,with special reference to ethnic differences in participation

Abstract

Aim: Non-participation in health surveys is a common phenomenon. When differences between participants and non-participants are considerable, the external validity of the sample survey may decrease and false conclusions might be drawn about the health status of the population. For this reason, the authors aimed to investigate the representativity of a postal questionnaire survey performed in the county of Scania, Sweden, in 1999—2000. The survey, which was based on an 18- to 80-year-old population sample, had a 58% response rate (n = 13 604). Methods: For some variables, the information obtained using the questionnaire was compared with information obtained from a population register that covers all the population in the county (for the 18- to 80-year-old group, n = 850 476). The population register includes, among other data, information on age, gender, educational level, country of birth, and healthcare expenditure. Results: Men, individuals with a low level of education, and immigrants were under-represented in the survey. However, except for immigrants, the under-representation was not large. Among immigrants, particularly those born in former Yugoslavia, the Arabic-speaking countries, and Poland were very significantly under-represented in the study. By contrast, immigrants born in other Nordic countries had responded to almost the same extent as respondents born in Sweden. The survey sample had about the same healthcare utilization costs as did the general population. Conclusions: In summary, the ``Health Survey for Scania, 2000'' seems largely representative of the total Scanian population. A major concern, however, is the under-representation of the immigrant population.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Marcus AC , Telesky CW Non-participation in telephone follow-up interviews. Am J Public Health 1983;73:72—7.

Chou P. , Kuo HS , Chen CH , Lin HC Characteristics of non-participants and reasons for non-participation in a population survey in Kin-Hu, Kinmen. Eur J Epidemiol 1997;13:195—200.

Livingston PM , Lee SE , McCarty CA , Taylor HR A comparison of participants with non-participants in a population-based epidemiologic study: The Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1997;4:73—81.

Jacomb PA , Jorm AF , Korten AE , Christensen H. , Henderson AS Predictors of refusal to participate: A longitudinal health survey of the elderly in Australia. BMC Public Health 2002 ;2:4.

Lissner L. , Skoog I. , Andersson K. , Beckman N. , Sundh V. , Waern M. , et al. Participation bias in longitudinal studies: Experience from the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg, Sweden . Scand J Prim Health Care 2003;21:242—7.

Law GR , Smith AG , Roman E. The importance of full participation: Lessons from a national case-control study. Br J Cancer 2002;86:350—5.

Merlo J. , Gerdtham UG , Lynch J. , Beckman A. , Norlund A. , Lithman T. Social inequalities in health—Do they diminish with age? Revisiting the question in Sweden 1999. Int J Equity Health 2003;2:2.

Altman DG , Machin D. , Bryant TN , Gardner MJ Statistics with confidence. 2nd ed. Bristol: BMJ Book, 2000.

Ronckers C. , Land C. , Hayes R. , Verduijn P. , van Leeuwen F. Factors impacting questionnaire response in a Dutch retrospective cohort study. Ann Epidemiol 2004;14:66—72.

10.

Ohlson CG , Ydreborg B. Participants and non-participants of different categories in a health survey: A cross-sectional register study. Scand J Soc Med 1985;13:67—74.

11.

Jensen AR , Storm HH , Moller S. , Overgaard J. Validity and representativity in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group—a study on protocol allocation and data validity from one county to a multi-centre database. Acta Oncol 2003;42:179—85.

12.

Lostao L. , Joiner TE , Pettit JW , Chorot P. , Sandin B. Health beliefs and illness attitudes as predictors of breast cancer screening attendance. Eur J Public Health 2001;11:274—9.

13.

Hasserius R. , Karlsson MK , Nilsson BE , Redlund-Johnell I. , Johnell O. Non-participants differ from participants as regards risk factors for vertebral deformities: A source of misinterpretation in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study . Acta Orthop Scand 2002;73:451—4.

14.

Romitti PA , Munger RG , Murray JC , Daack-Hirsch S. , Hanson JW , Burns TL The effect of follow-up on limiting non-participation bias in genetic epidemiologic investigations. Eur J Epidemiol 1998;14:129—38.

15.

Subar AF , Ziegler RG , Thompson FE , Johnson CC , Weissfeld JL , Reding D. , et al. Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:404—9.

16.

Manjer J. , Elmstahl S. , Janzon L. , Berglund G. Invitation to a population-based cohort study: Differences between subjects recruited using various strategies. Scand J Public Health 2002;30:103—12.

17.

Manjer J. , Carlsson S. , Elmstahl S. , Gullberg B. , Janzon L. , Lindstrom M. , et al. The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study: Rrepresentativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non-participants. Eur J Cancer Prev 2001;10:489—99.