Does mastering have an effect on disability pensioning independent of health,and may it explain divides of education in the Oslo Health Survey?

Abstract

Aims: Does mastering abilities have an independent effect on disability pensioning? Are some of the large divides across education explained by mastering factors when adjusted for health? Methods: Data from the National Insurance Administration were linked to a health survey of 10,720 Oslo inhabitants aged 40, 45, and 60 years, 46% of the total populations in these age groups who were invited to a Health Survey in 2000—01. Measures of general health, chronic somatic diseases, psychiatric symptoms, and musculoskeletal pain were self-reported. The mastering test Generalized Self Efficacy was used. Results: 10.5% of our eligible sample had disability pension at the time of the survey. The risk was more than five times higher for those with primary school than for those with university education and 50% higher for women than for men. Lowest score on the Generalized Self Efficacy test (poor mastering) had an age-, gender-, and health-adjusted OR of 2.4 compared with the highest level of mastering. Adjusting for mastering lowered the educational divide but not that of gender, when health indicators were taken into consideration Those reporting poor general health had a seven times higher risk than those with good health, and those with a chronic somatic disease, musculoskeletal pain, or poor psychiatric health had a somewhat lower increase in risk of disability pension. Health measures did reduce the impact of education, but not of gender, when adjusted for mastering. Conclusion: Poor mastering was associated with disability pensioning, and reduced the differences across educational level and health but not across gender.

Keywords

Disability benefits generalized self-efficacy mastering tests social inequalities social security

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Quinn JF , Burkhauser RV , Myers DA Passing the torch: The influence of economic incentives on work and retirement . Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute of Employment Research; 1990.

Pedersen PJ , Smith N. Duration analysis of the decision to retire early. In: Wadensjö E , editor. The Nordic labour markets in the 1990s . Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers ; 1996.

Dahl SÅ , Nesheim T.

Downsizing strategies and institutional environments. Scand J

Management 1998;14:239—57.

Krokstad S. , Johnsen R. , Westin S. Social determinants of disability pension: A 10-year follow-up of 62,000 people in a Norwegian county population. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31: 1183—91.

Marmot M. , Feeney A. , Shipley M. , North F. , Syme SL Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: From the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:124—30.

World Health Organization , International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. p 213.

Claussen B.

Physicians as gatekeepers: Will they contribute to restricting disability benefits?

Scand J Prim Health Care 1998;16:199—203.

Chirikos TN The relationship between health and labour market status. Annu Rev Public Health 1993 ;14:293—312.

Burkhauser RV , Couch KA , Phillips JW Who takes early social security benefits: The economic and health characteristics of early retirement . Gerontologist 1996;36:789—99.

10.

Claussen B. , Haugstvedt KTS. Who are beneficiaries and do they represent a potential employment reserve army? SHUS report 2000—06, OSLO: Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

11.

Bound J.

Self-reported versus objective measures of health in retirement models. J

Human Resources 1991;26:106—38.

12.

Lindbeck A. Welfare state disincentives with endogenous habits and norms. Scand J Economics 1997;97:477—94.

13.

Upmark M. , Lundberg I. , Sadigh J. , Bigert C. Conditions during childhood and adolescence as explanations of social class differences in disability pension among young men. Scand J Public Health 2001;29:96—103.

14.

Schwarzer R , editor. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington DC: Hemisphere; 1992.

15.

Rogers ES , Chamberlin J. , Ellison ML , Crean T. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv 1997;48:1042—7.

16.

Multon KD , Brown SD , Lent RW Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. J Couns Psychol 1991;38:30—8.

17.

Strausser DR , Ketz K. , Keim J. The relationship between self-efficacy, locus of control and work personality. J Rehabil 2002;68:20—6.

18.

Elstad JI Employment status and women's health — exploring the dynamics. Acta Sociologica 1995 ;38:231—49.

19.

Jackson T. , Iezzi T. , Gunderson J. , Nagasaka T. , Fritch A. Gender differences in pain perception: The mediating role of self-efficacy beliefs. Sex Roles 2002;47:561—8.

20.

Scholz U. , Doña BG , Sud S. , Schwarzer R.

Is Generalised self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. Eur

J Psychol Assess 2002;18:242—51.

21.

Søgaard AJ , Selmer R. , Bjertness E. , Thelle D. The Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health 2004;3:3. Available at: http://equityhealth.com/content/3/1/3 , 2004.

22.

Fylkesnes K. , Førde OH Determinants and dimensions involved in self-evaluation of health. Soc Sci Med 1992;35:271—9.

23.

Strand BH , Dalgard OS , Tambs K. , Rognerud M. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry 2003;57:113—18.

24.

Natvig B. , Eriksen WB , Bruusgaard D.

Low back pain as predictor of long-term work disability. Scand

J Public Health 2002;30:288—92.

25.

Hosmer DW , Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 2000.

26.

Vollrath M. Personality and stress. Scand J Personality 2001;42:35—47.

27.

Chen G. , Gully SM , Eden D. Generalised self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. J Organiz Behav 2004;25:375—95.

28.

Chen G. , Gully SM , Eden D. Validation of a new generalised self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods 2001;4:62—83.

29.

Schwarzer R , editor. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1992. [See especially: Halsted H. , Lorig K. Perceived self-efficacy in self-management of chronic disease, p 305— 23, and: Craig KE Role of physical self-efficacy in recovery from heart attack, p 287—304.], 1992.

30.

Shepherd M. , Cooper B. , Brown AC , et al. Psychiatric illness in generalised practice. London: Oxford University Press; 1966.

31.

Karasek R. The political implications of psychosocial work redesign: A model of the psychosocial class structure. Int J Health Services 1989;19:481—508.