Past research has proved equivocal in providing a correlation between the amplitude of cortical evoked potentials and attended or unattended stimuli. The present experiment is a further investigation of the relationship between selective attention and the cortical evoked potentials and avoids some methodological artifacts. The results of the experiment provide no direct support for the postulated correlation between the two variables, but do suggest two possible explanations of this state of affairs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsV. C.LangworthE. P. (1967). The contribution of background electrical activity to the form of averaged evoked potentials in chloralose anaesthetized cats. Exp. Neurol.18, 253–66.
2.
BattyJ.KahnemanD. (1966). Pupillary changes in two memory tasks. Psychon. Sci.5, 371–2.
3.
BergaminiL.BergamascoL.MombelliA. M. (1966). Variations in the visual evoked potentials in man, brought about by changes in pupillary diameter, and the state of cortical activation with particular reference to the phenomena of habituation, attention and distraction. J. Physiol. (Paris)58, 671–85.
4.
BroadbentD. E. (1956). Successive responses to simultaneous stimuli. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.8, 145–52.
5.
BroadbentD. E.GregoryM. (1963). Division of attention and the decision theory of signal detection. Proc. R. Soc. B.158, 222–31.
6.
CherryC. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and with two ears. J. acoust. Soc. Am.25, 975–9.
7.
CigáneckL. (1967). Effects of attention and distraction on the visually evoked potentials in man. A preliminary report. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. Supp.26, 70–73.
8.
CobbW. A.MortonH. B.EttlingerC. (1967). Cerebral potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry. Nature, Lond.216, 1123–5.
9.
EnneverJ.GartsideI. B.LippoldO. C. J.NovotnyG.ShagassC. (1967). Contamination of the human cortical evoked response with potentials of intra-orbital origin. J. Physiol. (Lond.)191, 5P–6P.
10.
FergusonG. A. (1965). Non-parametric Trend AnalysisMontreal: McGill University Press.
11.
Garcia-AusttE. (1963). Influence of the states of awareness upon sensory evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. Supp.24, 76–89.
12.
Garcia-AusttE.BogaczJ.VanuzulliA. (1964). Effects of attention and in attention upon visual evoked response. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.17, 136–43.
13.
GrossM. M.BegleiterH.TobinM.KissinB. (1965). Auditory evoked response in comparison during counting clicks and reading. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.18, 451–4.
14.
HaiderM.SpongP.LindsleyD. B. (1964). Attention, vigilance and cortical evoked potentials in humans. Science, N. Y.145, 180–2.
15.
Hernández-PeónR.ScherrerH.JouvetM. (1956). Modification of electrical activity in the cochlear nucleus during attention in unanaesthetized cats. Science, N.Y.123, 331–2.
16.
HorelJ. A.VierckC. (1967). Averaged evoked responses and learning. Science, N. Y.158, 394–5.
17.
HornG. (1965). Physiological and psychological aspects of selective perception. Advances in Animal BehaviourLehrmanD. S.HindeR. A.London: Shaw Academic PressVol. i, 155–215.
18.
JaneJ. A.SmirnovG. D.JasperH. H. (1962). Effects of distraction upon simultaneous auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.14, 344–58.
19.
KahnemanD.BeattyJ. (1967). Pupillary responses in a pitch discrimination task. Percept. Psychophys2, 101–5.
20.
LuceR. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. Handbook of Mathematical PsychologyLuceR. B.BushR. R.GalanterE.New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Vol. i, 103–189.
21.
MastE.WatsonC. S. (1969). Attention and auditory evoked responses to low detectability signals. Percept. Psychophys.4, 237–40.
22.
MoushegianG.RupertA.MarshJ.GalambosR. (1960). Evoked cortical potentials in absence of middle ear muscles. Science, N. Y.133, 582–3.
23.
NääTänenR. (1967). Selective attention and evoked potentials. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, B151, 0–226.
24.
NaquetR.RegisH.Fischer-WilliamsM.Fernandez-GuardiolaA. (1960). Variations in the responses evoked by light along specific pathways. Brain83, 52–6.
25.
PaivioA.SimpsonH. M. (1966). The effect of word abstractness and pleasantness. on pupil size during an imagery task. Psychom. Sci.5, 55–6.
26.
PalestiniM.DavidovitchA.Hernández-PeónR. (1959). Functional significance of centrifugal influences upon the retina. Acta Neurol. Latinoamer5, 113–31.
27.
PoultonE. C.FreemanP. R. (1966). Unwanted asymmetrical transfer effects with balanced experimental designs. Psychol. Bull.66, 1–8.
28.
RietveldW. J.TordoirW. E. M.HagenouwJ. R. B. (1966). Influence of attentiveness, of vigilance, of task difficulty and of habituation on cortical evoked response and on artifacts. Acta Physiol. Pharmac. Neerl.14, 18–37.
29.
RietveldW. J.TordoirW. E. M.HagenouwJ. R. B.LubbersJ. A.SpoorTh. A. C. (1967). Visual evoked responses to blank and to chequer board patterned flashes. Acta Physiol. Pharmac. Neerl.14, 259–85.
30.
SatterfieldJ. H. (1965). Evoked cortical response enhancement and attention in man. A study of responses to auditory and shock stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.19, 470–5.
31.
SatterfieldJ. H.CheatumD. (1964). Evoked cortical potential correlates of attention in human subjects. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.17, 456–7.
32.
SheatzG. C.ChapmanR. M. (1969). Task relevance and auditory evoked responses. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.26, 468–75.
33.
SpehlmannR. (1965). The averaged electrical response to diffuse and to patterned light in the human. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.19, 560–9.
34.
SpongP.HaiderM.LindsleyD. B. (1965). Selective attentiveness and cortical evoked responses to visual and auditory stimuli. Science, N.Y.148, 395–7.
35.
TannerW. P.SwetsJ. A. (1954). A decision making theory of visual detection. Psychol. Rev.6i, 401–9.
36.
WilkinsonR. T.MorlockH. C.WilliamsH. L. (1966). Evoked cortical response during vigilance. Psychon. Sci.4, 211–22.
37.
WilliamsH. T.TepasD. I.MorlockH. H. (1962). Evoked responses to clicks and electroencephalographic stages of sleep in man. Science, N. Y.138, 685–6.
