Seventy-three high school girls who received either imagery or repetition instructions attempted to recall a once-exposed series of 16 sentences shortly after exposure or one day later. Both the absolute and relative frequency with which semantically-related words were substituted for the verbatim language of the sentences increased over the retention interval. This fact was explained in terms of transfer from a phonological store to a semantic store. Sentences were almost always recalled as a whole if they were recalled at all, which was interpreted as evidence that sentences are learned and recalled as propositions rather than sets of independent associations among words or concepts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ. R.BowerG. H. (1971). On an associative trace for sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior10, 673–80.
2.
AndersonJ. R.BowerG. H. (1972). Configural properties in sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 594–605.
3.
AndersonR. C. (1971). Encoding processes in the storage and retrieval of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology91, 338–40.
4.
AndersonR. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research43, 145–170.
5.
AndersonR. C.HiddeJ. L. (1971). Imagery and sentence learning. Journal of Educational Psychology62, 526–30.
6.
AndersonR. C.OrtonyA. (1973). On putting apples into bottles: a problem of polysemy. Training Research LaboratoryUrbana, Illinois, Mimeo: University of Illinois.
7.
BartlettF. C. (1932). RememberingLondon: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BlumenthalA. L. (1967). Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior6, 203–6.
9.
BobrowA. (1970). Memory for words in sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 363–72.
10.
BransfordJ. D.McCarrellN. S.Some thoughts on understanding what it means to comprehend. Cognition and the symbolic processesPalermoD. S.WeinerW. B.Washington, D.C.: V. H. Winston & Sons.
11.
BruceD.CrowleyJ. J. (1970). Acoustic similarity effects on retrieval from secondary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 190–6.
12.
JohnsonR. E. (1970). Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 12–20.
13.
KatzJ. J.FodorJ. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language39, 170–210.
14.
LyonsJ. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguisticsLondon: Cambridge University Press.
15.
NewmanE. B. (1939). Forgetting of meaningful material during sleep and waking. American Journal of Psychology52, 65–71.
16.
SachsJ. S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics2, 437–42.
