The Relationship between Reaction Time and Intensity in Discrete Auditory Tasks

Abstract

The effect of signal intensity upon reaction time (RT) was studied in three auditory RT tasks in which the signal was a tone of high or low frequency. Experiment I showed the well-known negative gradient with intensity of simple RT when the subject was instructed to ignore the frequency and give the same response to both tones. But when the subject had to discriminate the frequency in a choice RT task, the RT/intensity relationship appeared to be U-shaped. Experiment II showed that when the subject was required to make a response to one signal but withhold it for the other, a task which requires discrimination of the frequency of the tone but removes the necessity to choose between overt responses, no increase in RT at high intensities was obtained. The results indicate that it is the response choice stage rather than the stimulus encoding stage which is retarded at higher energy levels. Experiment I also demonstrated that visual and auditory leading signals have similar facilitating effects without affecting the RT/intensity relationships.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernstein

I. H.

Chu

P. K.

Briggs

Schurman

D. D.

(1973). Stimulus intensity and foreperiod effects in intersensory facilitation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25, 171–81.

Bertelson

Tisseyre

(1969). The time course of preparation: confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals. In Koster

W. G.

(Ed.), Attention and Performance II, Acta Psychologica 30, 145–54.

Chocholle

(1945). Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité a diverses fréquences. Annales de Psychologie 41, 65–124.

Grice

G. R.

(1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation. Psychological Review 75, 359–73.

Keuss

P. J. G.

(1972). Reaction time to the second of two shortly spaced auditory signals both varying in intensity. Acta Psychologica 36, 226–38.

Keuss

P. J. G.

Orlebeke

J. F.

(1977). Transmarginal inhibition in a reaction time task as a function of extraversion and neuroticism. Acta Psychologica 41, 139–50.

Kohfeld

D. L.

(1969). Effects of ready-signal intensity and intensity of the preceeding response signal on simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82, 104–10.

Nickerson

R. S.

(1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement. Psychological Review 80, 489–509.

Nissen

M. J.

(1977). Stimulus intensity and information processing. Perception and Psychophysics 22, 338–52.

10.

Sanders

A. F.

(1975). The foreperiod effect revisited. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 27, 591–8.

11.

Sanders

A. F.

(1977). Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. In Dornic

(Ed.), Attention and Performance VI New York: John Wiley & Sons 3–25.

12.

Sanders

A. F.

Wertheim

A. H.

(1973). The relation between physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25, 201–6.

13.

Sternberg

(1969). The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders’ method. In Koster

W. G.

(Ed.), Attention and Performance II, Acta Psychologica 30, 276–315.

14.

Taylor

D. A.

(1976). Stage analysis of reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 83, 161–91.

15.

Thrane

V. C.

(1961). Sensory and preparatory factors in response latency: IV. General and Differential warning of full-scale auditory intensities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2, 211–24.

16.

Woodworth

R. S.

Schlossberg

(1954). Experimental Psychology, (Rev. Ed.) New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.