Two letter classification experiments examine the hypothesis that lateral asymmetries in perceptual processing are sensitive to subtle changes in task demands. The first experiment reports a right visual field superiority for an easy letter classification, but a left field superiority for a difficult classification using the same population of stimuli. Experiment II demonstrates that the right field superiority can be reversed if the easy classification trials are embedded among more difficult trials. The implications of these results for theories of hemispheric localization are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonJ.EgethH. (1973). Right hemisphere superiority in visual orientation matching. Canadian Journal of Psychology27, 152–8.
2.
BartonM.GoodglassH.ShaiA. (1965). Differential recognition of tachsto-scopically presented English and Hebrew words in right and left visual fields. Perceptual and Motor Skills21, 431–7.
3.
BrydenM. P.AllardF. (1976). Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface. Brain and Language3, 191–200.
4.
CohenG. (1973). Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology97, 349–56.
5.
DimondS. J. (1971). Hemispheric function and word registration. Journal of Experimental Psychology87, 183–6.
6.
EgethH.JonidesJ.WallS. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays. Cognitive Psychology3, 674–98.
7.
EllisH. D.ShepardJ. W. (1974). Recognition of abstract and concrete words presented in left and right visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology103, 1035–6.
8.
FudinR.MastersonC. C. (1975). Hemispheric factors and scanning dynamics in the processing of briefly exposed stimuli by human subjects: Bibliography. Perceptual and Motor Skills41, 299–310.
9.
GardnerE. B.BranskiD. M. (1976). Unilateral cerebral activation and perception of gaps: A signal detection analysis. Neuropsychologia14, 43–53.
10.
GazzanigaM. S. (1970). The Bisected BrainNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
11.
GeffenG.BradshawJ. L.NettletonN. C. (1973). Attention and hemispheric differences in reaction time during simultaneous audio-visual tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology25, 404–12.
12.
GeffenG.BradshawJ. L.WallaceG. (1971). Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and non-verbal visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology87, 415–22.
13.
HecaenH. (1969). Aphasic, apraxic, and agnostic syndromes in right and left hemisphere lesions. In VinkenP. J.BruynG. W. (Eds), Handbook of Clinical NeurologyAmsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Vol. 4.
14.
HelligeJ. B. (1978). Visual laterality patterns for pure- versus mixed-list presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4, 121–31.
15.
HelligeJ. B.CoxP. J. (1976). Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2, 210–21.
16.
HeronW. (1957). Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. American Journal of Psychology70, 38–48.
17.
KimuraD. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology15, 166–71.
18.
KimuraD. (1969). Spatial localization in left and right visual fields. Canadian Journal of Psychology23, 445–58.
19.
KimuraD. (1966). Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception. Neuropsychologia4, 275–85.
20.
KinsbourneM. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. In SandersA. F. (Ed.), Attention and Performance IIIAmsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
21.
KinsbourneM. (1973). The control of attention by interaction between the cerebral hemispheres. In KornblumS. (Ed.), Attention and Performance IVNew York: Academic Press.
22.
KinsbourneM. (1975). The mechanism of hemispheric control of the lateral gradient of attention. In RabbittP. M. A.DornicS. (Eds), Attention and Performance VNew York: Academic Press.
23.
LevyJ.TrevarthenC. (1976). Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2, 299–312.
24.
LevyJ.TrevarthenC.SperryR. W. (1972). Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric disconnection. Brain95, 61–78.
25.
Levy-AgrestiJ.SperryR. W. (1968). Differential perceptual capacities in major and minor hemispheres. Proceedings of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences61, 1151.
26.
McKeeverW. F.HulingM. D. (1970). Left-cerebral hemisphere superiority in tachistoscopic word-recognition performances. Perceptual and Motor Skills30, 763–6.
27.
MishkinM.ForgaysD. G. (1952). Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology43, 43–8.
28.
OldfieldR. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia9, 97–113.
29.
OrbachJ. (1952). Retinal locus as a factor in the recognition of visually perceived words. American Journal of Psychology65, 555–62.
30.
PatersonA.ZangwillO. L. (1944). Disorders of visual space perception associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain67, 331–58.
31.
PattersonK.BradshawJ. L. (1975). Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1, 246–52.
32.
RizzolattiG.UmiltaC.BerlucchiG. (1971). Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material. Brain94, 431–42.
33.
SperryR. W.GazzanigaM. S.BogenJ. E. (1969). Interhemispheric relationships: The neocortical commisures; syndromes of hemispheric disconnection. In VinkenP. F.BruynG. W. (Eds), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (Vol. 4). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
34.
UmiltaC.FrostH.HymanR. (1972). Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology93, 198–204.
35.
WhiteM. J. (1969). Laterality differences in perception. Psychological Bulletin72, 387–405.
36.
WhiteM. J. (1972). Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information-processing. British Journal of Psychology63, 497–508.
