Modality Effects: Do They Fall on Deaf Ears?

Abstract

The present study tests the assumption of the PAS theory of echoic memory (Greene & Crowder, 1984) that the representation of acoustic features is necessary in producing modality effects. Performance by deaf subjects was compared to hearing subjects on serial and free-recall tasks with vocalizing and non-vocalizing conditions. For the serial tasks, typical modality and acoustic similarity effects were observed with hearing subjects, and no such effects were found with deaf subjects. However, for the free-recall task, modality effects were found for both deaf and hearing subjects. It is unlikely that phonological coding resulting from gestural cues mediates the modality effect, as phonological confusion errors for deaf and hearing subjects did not correlate with the size of this effect.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bellugi

Klima

E. S.

Siple

(1975). Remembering in signs. Cognition 3, (2) 93–125.

Campbell

Dodd

(1980). Hearing by eye. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, 85–99.

Conrad

(1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology 55, (1) 75–84.

Conrad

(1970). Short-term memory processes in the deaf. British Journal of Psychology 61, 179–195.

Conrad

(1979). The deaf school child London: Harper & Row.

Crowder

R. G.

(1971). The sound of vowels and consonants in immediate memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10, 587–596.

Crowder

R. G.

(1972). Visual and auditory memory. Language by ear and by eye. Kavanagh

J. F.

Mattingly

I. G.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Crowder

R. G.

(1983). The purity of auditory memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B302, 251–265.

Crowder

R. G.

(1986). Auditory and temporal factors in the modality effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 12, (2) 268–278.

10.

Crowder

R. G.

Morton

(1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). Perception and Psychophysics 5, 363–373.

11.

Engle

R. W.

(1974). The modality effect: Is precategorical acoustic storage responsible?. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102, 824–829.

12.

Greene

R. L.

Crowder

R. G.

(1984). Modality and suffix effects in the absence of auditory stimulation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, 371–382.

13.

Hanson

V. L.

Fowler

C. A.

(1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory and Cognition 15, (3) 199–207.

14.

Nairne

J. S.

(1988). A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall. Memory and Cognition 16, (4) 343–352.

15.

Nairne

J. S.

Crowder

R. G.

(1982). On the locus of the stimulus suffix effect. Memory and Cognition 10, 350–357.

16.

Nairne

J. S.

Walters

V. L.

(1983). Silent mouthing produces modality and suffix-like effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, 371–382.

17.

Richardson

J. T. E.

(1979). Precategorical acoustic storage and postcategorical lexical storage. Cognitive Psychology 11, 265–286.

18.

Spoehr

K. T.

Corin

W. J.

(1978). The stimulus suffix effect as a memory coding phenomenon. Memory and Cognition 6, (6) 583–589.

19.

Watkins

M. J.

Watkins

O. C.

Crowder

R. G.

(1974). The modality effect in free and serial recall as a function of phonological similarity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 55, (1) 75–84.