The Effect of Erroneous Knowledge of Results on Skill Acquisition when Augmented Information is Redundant

Abstract

Even though it can be shown that verbal knowledge of results (KR) is redundant with sensory feedback for learning certain motor skills, such findings do not eliminate the possibility that when KR is available it influences underlying learning processes. In order to examine the function of KR more closely, two experiments were designed in which the subjects received conflicting information about their own sensory feedback and the KR presented by the experimenter. In Experiment 1, two erroneous-KR groups, a correct-KR group, and a no-KR group performed 150 practice trials on a simple anticipation timing task and then performed three no-KR retention tests of 30 trials each following intervals of 10 minutes, 1 week, and 1 month. The results supported previous findings that providing correct KR is redundant in anticipation tasks. However, learning was influenced by KR as subjects performed according to the erroneous KR information, thereby ignoring their sensory feedback even after a 1-month interval. In Experiment 2, subjects practised a more complex striking response for the anticipation task for 75 trials and then performed no-KR retention trials either immediately, or 1 day or 1 week later. One of the groups received erroneous KR after 50 practice trials with correct KR. The results confirmed and extended those from Experiment 1, as erroneous KR, even after initial practice with correct KR, influenced retention performance. These results indicate that although KR provides information that is not needed to learn anticipation timing skills, this augmented verbal information is a dominant source of information that influences underlying cognitive processes involved in learning motor skills.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. A.

(1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin 101, 41–71.

Armstrong

T. R.

(1970). Feedback and perceptual-motor skill learning: A review of information feedback and manual guidance training techniques Technical Report No. 25 Human Performance Center, University of Michigan.

Belisle

J. J.

(1963). Accuracy, reliability, and refractoriness in a coincidence-anticipation task. Research Quarterly 34, 271–281.

Bell

V. L.

(1968). Augmented knowledge of results and its effect upon acquisition and retention of a gross motor skill. Research Quarterly 39, 25–30.

Buekers

M. J.

(1984). Invloed van verschillende soorten feedback op de externe timing in coïncidentie-anticipatietaken Leuven: Leuven University Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

Dorfman

P. W.

(1977). Timing and anticipation: A developmental perspective. Journal of Motor Behavior 9, 67–79.

Haywood

K. M.

(1975). Relative effects of three knowledge of results treatments on coincident-anticipation performance. Journal of Motor Behavior 7, 271–274.

Jensen

B. E.

Picado

M. E.

Morenz

(1981). Effects of precision of knowledge of results on performance of a gross motor coincidence-anticipation task. Journal of Motor Behavior 13, 9–17.

Klein

R. M.

(1976). Attention and movement. Motor control: Issues and trends. Stelmach

G. E.

New York: Academic Press 143–173.

10.

Mace

W. M.

(1977). James J. Gibson's strategy for perceiving: Ask not what's inside your head, but what your head's inside of. Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Shaw

Bransford

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 43–65.

11.

Magill

R. A.

Chamberlin

C. J.

Hall

K. G.

(1991). Verbal knowledge of results as redundant information for learning an anticipation timing skill. Human Movement Sciences 10, 485–507.

12.

Ramella

R. J.

(1984). Effect of knowledge of results on anticipation timing by young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 59, 519–525.

13.

Salmoni

A. W.

Schmidt

R. A.

Walter

C. B.

(1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95, 355–386.

14.

Slater-Hammel

A. T.

(1960). Reliability, accuracy, and refractoriness of a transit reaction. Research Quarterly 31, 217–228.

15.

Tyldesly

D. A.

Whiting

H. T. A.

(1975). Operational timing. Journal of Human Movement Studies 1, 172–177.

16.

Wrisberg

C. A.

Paul

Ragsdale

M. R.

(1979). Subject gender, knowledge of results and receptor anticipation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 50, 699–708.