The performance of deep dyslexics in oral reading and other tasks suggests that they are poor at activating the phonology of words and non-words from printed stimuli. As the tasks ordinarily used to test deep dyslexics require controlled processing, it is possible that the phonology of printed words can be better activated on an automatic basis. This study investigated this possibility by testing a deep dyslexic patient on a lexical decision task with pairs of stimuli presented simultaneously. In Experiment 1, which used content words as stimuli, the deep dyslexic, like normal subjects, showed faster reaction times on trials with rhyming, similarly spelled stimuli (e.g. bribe-tribe) than on control trials (consisting of non-rhyming, dissimilarly spelled words), but slower reaction times on trials with non-rhyming, similarly spelled stimuli (e.g. couch-touch). When the experiment was repeated using function words as stimuli, the patient no longer showed a phonological effect. Therefore, the phonological activation of printed content words by deep dyslexics may be better than would be expected on the basis of their oral reading performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarryC., & RichardsonJ.T.E. (1988). Accounts of oral reading in deep dyslexia. In WhitakerH.A. (Ed.), Phonological processes and brain mechanisms (pp. 118–171). New York: Springer-Verlag.
2.
BubD., CancilliereA., & KerteszA. (1985). Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling to sound in a non-semantic reader. In PattersonK.E., MarshallJ.C., & ColtheartM. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 15–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
3.
ColtheartM. (1980). Deep dyslexia: A review of the syndrome. In ColtheartM., PattersonK., & MarshallJ.C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 22–47). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4.
ColtheartM. (1981). Analysing acquired disorders of reading. Unpublished manuscript.
CoslettH.B., & SaffranE.M. (1989). Evidence for preserved reading in “pure alexia”Brain, 112, 327–359.
7.
de HaanE.H.F., YoungA., & NewcombeF. (1987). Face recognition without aware-ness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4, 385–415.
8.
DunnL.M., & DunnL.M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9.
EllisA.W., & MarshallJ.C. (1978). Semantic errors or statistical flukes? A note on Allport's “On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 569–575.
10.
FowlerC.A., WolfordG., SladeR., & TassinaryL. (1981). Lexical access with and without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 341–362.
11.
FunnellE. (1983). Phonological processes in reading: New evidence from acquired dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 159–180.
12.
FunnellE. (1987). Morphological errors in acquired dyslexia: A case of mistaken identity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 497–539.
13.
GoodglassH., & KaplanE. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders.Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
14.
HansonV.L., & FowlerC.A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory & Cognition, 15, 199–207.
15.
HillingerM.L. (1980). Priming effects with phonemically similar words: The encoding-bias hypothesis reconsidered. Memory & Cognition, 8, 115–123.
16.
HintonG.E., & ShalliceT. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74–95.
17.
HumphreysG.W., EvettL.J., & TaylorD.E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 576–590.
18.
KaplanE., GoodglassH., & WeintraubS. (1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
19.
KatzR.B., & DeserT. (1991). Distinguishing representation and processing deficits in a case of acquired dysgraphia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 249–266.
20.
LaineM., NiemiP., NiemiJ., & Koivuselkä-SallinenP. (1990). Semantic errors in a deep dyslexic. Brain and Language, 38, 207–214.
21.
MarcelA.J. (1983a). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197–237.
22.
MarcelA.J. (1983b). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–300.
23.
MeyerD.E., SchvaneveldtR.W., & RuddyM.G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition. Memory & Cognition, 2, 309–321.
24.
MilbergW., & BlumsteinS.E. (1981). Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing. Brain and Language, 14, 371–385.
25.
MortonJ., & PattersonK. (1980a). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In ColtheartM., PattersonK., & MarshallJ.C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 91–118). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
PaivioA., YuilleJ.C, & MadiganS.A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement,76, 1–25.
28.
PattersonK.E. (1978). Phonemic dyslexia: Errors of meaning and the meaning of errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 587–607.
29.
PattersonK.E. (1979). What is right with “deep” dyslexia patients?Brain and Language,8, 112–129.
30.
PattersonK.E. (1982). The relation between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological observations. In EllisA.W. (Eds.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 77–111). New York: Academic Press.
31.
PattersonK.E., & MarcelA.J. (1977). Aphasia, dyslexia, and the phonological coding of written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 307–318.
32.
SaffranE.M., & MarinO.S.M. (1977). Reading without phonology: Evidence from aphasia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 515–525.
33.
ShalliceT., & CoughlanA.K. (1980). Modality specific word comprehension deficits in deep dyslexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 43, 866–872.
34.
ShalliceT., & McGillJ. (1978). The origins of mixed errors. In RequinJ. (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 193–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35.
ShalliceT., & SaffranE.M. (1986). Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter reader. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 429–458.
36.
ShalliceT., & WarringtonE.K. (1975). Word recognition in a phonemic dyslexic patient. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 187–199.
37.
ShulmanH.G., HornakR., & SandersE. (1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures. Memory & Cognition, 6, 115–123.
38.
ThorndikeEX., & LorgeI. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College.
39.
WarringtonE.K., & WeiskrantzL. (1968). New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature, 217, 972–974.
40.
WechslerD. (1945). Wechsler memory scale. New York: The Psychological Corp.
41.
WechslerD. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—revised. New York: The Psychological Corp.
42.
WeiskrantzL., WarringtonE.K., SandersM.D., & MarshallJ. (1974). Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain, 97, 709–728.
