It was hypothesized that subjects misrepresent the THOG problem by confusing data and hypotheses. An abstract version of the problem in which the given exemplars and the hypothetical ones were designated by two different labels was used in three experiments. Experiment 1 showed that this version elicits a better performance than the standard version of the problem. Experiments 2 and 3 confirmed these results, by ruling out a possible alternative account of the facilitatory effect obtained in Experiment 1. The present results are discussed in relationship to the general issues of content effects and non-consequentialism in reasoning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GirottoV.LegrenziP. (1989). Mental representation and hypothetico-deductive reasoning: The case of the THOG problem.Psychological Research51, 129–135.
2.
GriggsR. A.NewsteadS. E. (1982). The role of problem structure in a deductive reasoning task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition8, 297–307.
3.
HolyoakK. J.SpellmanB. A. (1993). Thinking.Annual Review of Psychology44, 265–315.
4.
InhelderB.PiagetJ. (1955). De la logique de l'enfant à la logique de I'adolescentParis: PUF. Engl. trans. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence, New York, Basic Books 1958.
5.
NewsteadS. E.GriggsR. A. (1992). Thinking about THOG: Sources of error in a deductive reasoning problem.Psychological Research54, 299–305.
6.
NewsteadS. E.GriggsR. A.WarnerS. A. (1982). The effects of realism on Wason's THOG problem.Psychological Research44, 85–96.
7.
O'BrienD. P.NoveckI. A.DavidsonG. M.FishS. M.LeaR. B.FreitagJ. (1990). Sources of difficulty in deductive reasoning: the THOG task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology42, 329–351.
8.
SmithM. M.ClarkS. E. (1986). My half-sister is a THOG: Strategic processes in a reasoning task.British Journal of Psychology77, 275–287.
9.
ShafirE.TverskyA. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice.Cognitive Psychology24, 449–474.
10.
TverskyA.ShafirE. (1992). The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty.Psychological Science3, 305–309.
11.
WasonP. C. (1966). Reasoning.New horizons in psychology.FossB.Harmonds-worth: Penguin.
12.
WasonP. C. (1977). The theory of formal operations: A critique.Piaget and knowing.GeberB.London: Routledge.
13.
WasonP. C. (1978). Hypothesis testing and reasoningUnit 25, Block 4, Cognitive PsychologyMilton Keynes: Open University.
14.
WasonP. C.BrooksP. G. (1979). THOG: The anatomy of a problem.Psychological Research41, 79–90.
