A novel composite scarf joint is successfully fabricated with thermoplastic core shell microparticles incorporated into the interlaminar interface regions with a dual objective of mitigating the impact damage and improving the stiffness compatibility of the joint. The impact analysis of the joints revealed that the incorporation of microparticles led to a significant improvement of the impact load bearing capacity of joint and reduced the extent of the damage area. It is also observed from flexural tests that the microparticles reduces the stiffness of the laminate proportional to the weight fraction of the particles and thereby help design a joint adherend with controlled matching stiffness. This engineered scarf joint adherend configuration has the potential to minimise stiffness mismatch between a fatigue worn-out damaged composite part and the new scarf repair patch laminate designed for it. This shall help ensuring an easy restoration of uniform load distribution in the newly bonded composite scarf joints and repairs.
PavlopoulouS., SoutisC. and MansonG.: ‘Non-destructive inspection of adhesively bonded patch repairs using Lamb waves’, Plast. Rubber Compos., 2012, 41, (2), 61–68. doi: 10.1179/1743289810Y.0000000030
5.
GkikasG., LekatouA., SioulasD. and PaipetisA. S.: ‘Effect of carbon nanotube enhanced adhesives on degradation of bonded joints in corrosive environments’, Plast. Rubber Compos., 2014, 43, (10), 322–329. doi: 10.1179/1743289814Y.0000000085
6.
HautierM., LévêqueD., HuchetteC. and OlivierP.: ‘Investigation of composite repair method by liquid resin infiltration’, Plast. Rubber Compos., 2010, 39, (3–5), 200–207. doi: 10.1179/174328910X12647080902411
7.
ArmstrongK. B., BevanL. G. and ColeW. F.: ‘Care and repair of advanced composites’, 2001, Pennsylvania, PA, SAE International.
8.
MyhreS. H. and BeckC. E.: ‘Repair concepts for advanced composite structures’, J. Aircraft, 1979, 16, (10), 720–728. doi: 10.2514/3.58595
9.
CamineroM. A., PavlopoulouS., Lopez-PedrosaM., NicolaissonB. G., PinnaC. and SoutisC.: ‘Analysis of adhesively bonded repairs in composites: Damage detection and prognosis’, Compos. Struct., 2013, 95, 500–517. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.028
10.
KatsiropoulosC. V. and PantelakisS. G.: ‘Assessment of imperfect bonding of adhesively bonded U-joints using ultrasonic inspection’, Plast. Rubber Compos., 2014, 43, (10), 316–321. doi: 10.1179/1743289814Y.0000000083
11.
XiaoquanC., BaigY., RenweiH., YujianG. and JikuiZ.: ‘Study of tensile failure mechanisms in scarf repaired CFRP laminates’, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 2013, 41, 177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.015
12.
AkpinarS.: ‘The Effect of composite patches on the failure of adhesively-bonded joints under bending moment’, Appl. Compos. Mater., 2013, 20, (6), 1289–1304. doi: 10.1007/s10443-013-9335-6
13.
KatsiropoulosC. V. and PantelakisS. G.: ‘Assessing effect of different surface treatments on fracture toughness behaviour of adhesively bonded 8552/AS4 composite joints’, Plast. Rubber Compos., 2013, 42, (5), 179–186. doi: 10.1179/1743289811Y.0000000045
14.
FeihS., GunnionA. J., LiH. C. H. and HerszbergI.: ‘Loaded carbon composite scarf joints subjected to impact’, Proc. Fifth Aust. Congr. on ‘Applied Mechanics (ACAM 2007)’, Brisbane, Australia, December 2007 (ed. V. Martin et al.), Engineers Australia, Barton, 2007.
15.
LiH. C. H., FeihS., GunnionA. J., HerszbergI. and ScottM. L.: ‘Loaded carbon composite scarf joint subject to quasi steady lateral loads’, 26th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS 2008), Alaska, USA, September 2008.
16.
TakahashiI., TakedaS. I., IwahoriY. and TakedaN.: ‘Evaluation of the impact damages of scarf-repaired composites’, J. Soc. Mater Sci. Jpn., 2007, 56, (5), 414–419. doi: 10.2472/jsms.56.414
17.
KimM. K., ElderD. J., WangC. H. and FeihS.: ‘Interaction of laminate damage and adhesive disbonding in composite scarf joints subjected to combined in-plane loading and impact’, Compos. Struct., 2012, 94, 945–953. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.017
18.
AliM. and JoshiS. C.: ‘Impact damage resistance of CFRP prepreg laminates with dispersed CSP particles into ply interfaces’, Int. J. Damage Mech., 2012, 21, (8), 1106–1127. doi: 10.1177/1056789511429143
WhislerD. and KimH.: ‘Effect of impactor radius on low-velocity impact damage of glass/epoxy composites’, J. Compos. Mater., 2012, 46, (25), 3137–3149. doi: 10.1177/0021998312436991
21.
SAE AIR-5946: ‘Design and application of composite repairs for thermosetting composites’, 2004, Pennsylvania, PA, SAE International.
22.
YangJ. N., LeeL. J. and SheuD. Y.: ‘Modulus reduction and fatigue damage of matrix dominated composite laminates’, Compos. Struct., 1992, 21, (2), 91–100. doi: 10.1016/0263-8223(92)90044-D
23.
WharmbyA. W., EllyinF. and WolodkoJ. D.: ‘Observations on damage development in fibre reinforced polymer laminates under cyclic loading’, Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, 25, (5), 437–446. doi: 10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00118-4
24.
Taheri-BehroozF., ShokriehM. M. and LessardL. B.: ‘Residual stiffness in cross-ply laminates subjected to cyclic loading’, Compos. Struct., 2008, 85, (3), 205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.025
25.
WhitworthH. A.: ‘A stiffness degradation model for composite laminates under fatigue loading’, Compos. Struct., 1997, 40, (2), 95–101. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00142-6
26.
OginS. L., SmithP. A. and BeaumontP. W. R.: ‘Matrix cracking and stiffness reduction during the fatigue of a (0/90)s GFRP laminate’, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1985, 22, (1), 23–31. doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(85)90088-0
