The spalling limit in transversely isotropic materials,the prediction of the maximum height of failure,and the design of long-tendon roof support systems
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2018
The spalling limit in transversely isotropic materials,the prediction of the maximum height of failure,and the design of long-tendon roof support systems
In bedded sedimentary rocks with low strength relative to the stress conditions the maximum height of failure above roadways and tunnels can be predicted using the spalling limit concept and a parameter to address transverse isotropy. For siltstones and mudstones a spalling limit of 50° and Young's modulus/independent shear modulus ratio of 100 can be used for roof support design. Using this failure criterion, simple design charts can be produced to provide an appreciation of the roof support requirements in various mining situations. Bulking factors can be applied to the predicted failure heights to provide roof deformation triggers.
BertuziR, PellsPJN. 2002. Geotechnical parameters of Sydney Sandstone and shale. Aust Geomech. 37:41–54.
2.
BradyBHG, BrownET. 1985. Rock mechanics for underground mining. London: George Allen & Unwin.
3.
DiederichsMS. 2007. The 2003 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: mechanistic interpretation and practical application of damage and spalling prediction criteria for deep tunnelling. Can Geotech J. 44:1082–1116.10.1139/T07-033
4.
FabjanczykMW, TarrantGC, GuyRJ. 1992. Assessment and application of high capacity roof bolting systems. Report to AMIRA, Project P207A.
5.
GaleWJ, MatthewsSM. 1992. Stress control methods for optimised development and extraction operations. Report to National Energy Research Development, and Demonstration (NERD&D) Program, Project 1301.
6.
GerrardCM, DavisEH, WardleLJ. 1972. Estimation of the settlement of cross-anisotropic deposits using isotropic theory. Geomech J. 62:1–10.
7.
HoekE, KaiserPK, BawdenWF. 1998. Support of underground excavations in hard rock. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
8.
KaiserPK, KimB-H. 2008. Rock mechanics challenges in underground construction and mining. In: PotvinY, CarterJ, DyskinA, JeffreyR, editors. SHIRMS 2008, Sep 16–19; Perth (Australia).
9.
KaiserPK, KimB-H. 2015. Characterization of strength of intact brittle rock considering confinement-dependent failure processes. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 48:107–119.10.1007/s00603-014-0545-5
10.
KaiserPK, McCreathDr, TannantDD. 1996. Canadian rockburst support handbook. Sudbury: Mining Research Directorate.
11.
MartinCD, KaiserPK, McCreathDr. 1998. Hoek–Brown parameters for predicting the depth of brittle failure around tunnels. Can Geotech J. 36:136–151.
12.
PerrasMA. 2014. Understanding and predicting excavation damage in sedimentary rocks: a continuum approach [PhD thesis]. Kingston: Queens University.
13.
SeedsmanRW. 2009. An update of conditions in the Donkin-Morien tunnels. In: DiederichsM, GrasselliG, editors. RockEng09 rock engineering in difficult conditions. Proceedings from the 3rd Canada-US Rock Mechanics Symposium & 20th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium; 2009 May 9–15; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
14.
SeedsmanRW.2011. Application of the brittle failure criterion to the design of roof support in the soft rocks of coal mines. In: AzizN, KininmonthW, NemcikJ, RenT, editors. Coal2011. Proceedings of the 2011 Coal Operators’ Conference; 2011 Feb 10–11. Wollongong: The University of Wollongong.
15.
SeedsmanRW. 2014a. Practical strength criterion for coal mine roof support design in laminated soft rocks. Trans Inst Mining Metall. 122:243–249.
16.
SeedsmanRW.2014b. Suspension designs required in the logical framework. In: BarczakT, IngoldM, PengSS, SchmidtD, TadoliniS, ThompsonM, editors. Proceedings 33rd International Conference on Ground Control in Mining; 2014 Jul 29–31; Morgantown, WV, USA.
