This paper examines how social network analysis (SNA) methods and tools can be used to evaluate instruction and teaching methods in an MPA program. With a unique way of collecting and analyzing data—both statistically and visually— SNA tools enable public affairs educators to (a) identify patterns of interaction among students, (b) identify characteristics of student friendships and advice networks, (c) design teaching methods and interventions to facilitate student interaction, and (d) develop students’ interpersonal skills so they can learn in collaborative environments. The case study in this paper provides an example of how SNA was used to evaluate changes in student interactions and collaborative learning during an MPA class at the University of Central Florida (UCF).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Analytic Technologies. (2008). Centrality. Retrieved February 21, 2008, from Analytic Technologies: http://www.analytictech.com/networks/centrali.htm.
2.
BelottiE. (2009). Brokerage roles between cliques: A secondary clique analysis.Methodological Innovations Online, 4, 53–73.
3.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. C.FreemanL. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis.Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
4.
BossertS. (1988–89). Cooperative activities in the classroom.Review of Research in Education, 15, 225–250.
5.
BruffeeK. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “Conversation of Mankind.”College English, 46(7), 635–652.
6.
BurtR. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
ChoH.LeeJ.StefanoneM.GayG. (2005). Development of computer supported collaborative social networks in a distributed learning community.Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(6), 435–447.
8.
ComfortL. K.HaaseT. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure.Public Works Management and Policy, 10(3), 328–343.
9.
CrossR.ThomasR. J. (2009). Driving results through social networks: How top organizations leverage networks for performance and growth.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
DillenbourgP.BakerM.BlayeA.O’MalleyC. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In ReimannP.SpadaH. (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
11.
DimitracopoulouA.PetrouA. (n.d.). Publications and talks.Kaleidoscope, interaction analysis: Supporting participants in technology based learning activities. Retrieved on May 16, 2008, from http://www.rhodes.aegean.gr/LTEE/kaleidoscopeicalts/Publications/dimitracopoulou_petrou_Themes.pdf (Last retrieved on May 16, 2008. Article no long available at this site).
12.
DurlandM. M.FredericksK. A. (2006). Social network analysis in program evaluation.San Francisco: Wiley Periodicals.
13.
FinkelD. I. (2000). Teaching with your mouth shut.Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
14.
GokhaleA. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking.Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.
15.
HannemanR. A. (2001). Introduction to social network methods.Riverside: University of California Riverside.
16.
KapucuN. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multi-agency coordination, American Review of Public Administration (ARPA), 36(2), 207–225.
17.
MingusM. S. (1999). Toward understanding the culture of Internet-mediated learning.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(3), 225.
18.
MongeP. R.ContractorN. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks.New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
ProvanK. G.VeazieM. A.StatenL. K.Teufel-ShoneN. I. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships.Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603–613.
20.
SengeP.SmithB.KruschwitzN.LaurJ.SchleyS. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world.New York: Doubleday.
21.
TrimburJ. (1989). Consensus and difference in collaborative learning.College English, 51(6), 602–616.
22.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
