Information Needs and Self-Efficacy: Internet Use by Women with Breast Cancer

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the scholarly literature on the information-seeking behavior and empowerment of women who use the Internet to research treatment options for breast cancer. The article examines the information needs women with breast cancer have regarding the Internet, and further the extent to which the Internet has satisfied those needs – from diagnosis through survivorship. We briefly discuss uses and gratifications theory, while focusing on information seeking and self-efficacy. The traditional mass communication theories of uses and gratifications and self-efficacy can be utilized as the basis for social marketing interventions or campaigns. Although the Internet offers an immediate and ubiquitous resource for women with breast cancer, issues of accessibility prevent the most vulnerable populations from experiencing the benefits of online interaction. Social marketers need to continue to explore the possibilities of utilizing the Internet to engage older, minority, and low-income women.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Cancer Society. (2008). Overview: Breast cancer – How many women get breast cancer? Retrieved November 13, 2008, from http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_2_1X_How_many_people_get_breast_cancer_5.asp?sitearea.

Atkin

C. K.

(1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In Clarke

(ed.), New models for mass communication research (pp. 205–242). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

Bandura

(1977). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Bass

Ruzek

Gordon

Fleisher

McKeown-Conn

Moore

(2006). Relationship of internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: Patients who contact the national cancer institute's information service. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 219–236.

Bodie

Dutta

(2008). Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: Ehealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide. Health Marketing Quarterly, 25, 175–203.

Bowen

Meischke

Bush

Woolridge

Robbins

Ludwig

(2003). Predictors of women's internet access and internet health seeking. Health Care for Women International, 24, 940–951.

Della

Eroglu

Bernhardt

Edgerton

Nall

(2008). Looking to the future of new media in health marketing: Deriving propositions based on traditional theories. Health Marketing Quarterly, 25, 147–174.

Eysenbach

(2003). The impact of the internet on cancer outcomes. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53, 356–371.

10.

Fogel

Albert

Schnabel

Ditkoff

Neuget

(2002). Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychology, 21, 398–404.

11.

Fogel

Albert

Schnabel

Ditkoff

Neuget

(2003). Racial and ethnic differences and potential psychological benefits in use of the internet by women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 12, 107–117.

12.

Fox

(2006). Online health search 2006. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from http://pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf.

13.

Gustafson

Hawkins

Pingree

McTavish

Arora

Mendenhall

(2001). Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 435–445.

14.

Gustafson

McTavish

Stengle

Ballard

Hawkins

Shaw

(2005). Use and impact of ehealth system by low-income women with breast cancer. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 195–218.

15.

Hack

Degner

Dyck

(1994). Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 279–289.

16.

Helft

Hlubocky

Daugherty

(2003). American oncologists’ views of internet use by cancer patients: A mail survey of American society of clinical oncology members. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 942–947.

17.

Helft

P. R.

(2004). Breast cancer in the information age: A review of recent developments. Breast Disease, 21, 41–46.

18.

Hoybye

Johansen

Tjornjoj-Thomsen

(2005). Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 211–220.

19.

Internet World Stats. (2008). Usage and population statistics. Retrieved January 18, 2009, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats14.htm#north.

20.

Katz

Blumler

Gurevitch

(1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In Blumer

Katz

(Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.

21.

Kreps

(2008). Strategic use of communication to market cancer prevention and control to vulnerable populations. Health Marketing Quarterly, 25, 204–216.

22.

LaCoursiere

Knobf

McCorkle

(2005). Cancer patients’ self-reported attitudes about the internet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(3), e22.

23.

Lieberman

Golant

Giese-Davis

Winzelberg

Benjamin

Humphreys

(2003). Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: A clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer, 97, 920–925.

24.

Love

(2002). Fears, feelings, and ways to cope. In Love

Lindsey

(Eds.), Dr. Susan Love's breast book (pp. 347–363). Cambridge: Da Capo Press.

25.

Monnier

Laken

Carter

(2002). Patient and caregiver interest in internet-based cancer services. Cancer Practice, 10, 305–310.

26.

National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine. (2004). Meeting the psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer. Retrieved November 30, 2006, from http://www.nap.edu/html/psychosocial/reportbrief.pdf.

27.

Newnham

Burns

W. I.

Snyder

Dowling

Ranieri

Gray

(2005). Attitudes of oncology health professionals to information from the internet and other media. Medical Journal of Australia, 183, 197–199.

28.

Orgad

(2005). The transformative potential of onine communication. Feminist Media Studies, 5, 141–161.

29.

Owen

Klapow

Roth

Nabell

Tucker

(2004). Improving the effectiveness of adjuvant psychological treatment for women with breast cancer: The feasibility of providing online support. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 281–292.

30.

Owen

Klapow

Roth

Shuster

Bellis

Meredith

(2005). Randomized pilot of a self-guided internet coping group for women with early stage breast cancer. Annals of Behavorial Medicine, 30(1): 54–64.

31.

Owen

Klapow

Roth

Tucker

(2004). Use of the internet for information and support: Disclosure among persons with breast and prostate cancer. Journal of Behavorial Medicine, 27, 491–505.

32.

Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2008, November 19-December 20). Tracking survey. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org.

33.

Pitts

(2004). Illnesss and Internet empowerment, writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness, and Medicine, 8(1), 33–59.

34.

Raupach

Hiller

(2002). Information and support for women following the primary treatment of breast cancer. Health Expectations, 5, 289–301.

35.

Rodgers

Chen

(2005). Internet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), article 5. Retrieved November 12, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/rodgers.html.

36.

Rogers

(1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In Cacioppo

Petty

(Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford.

37.

Rosengren

Windahal

(1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In McQuail

(Ed.), Sociology of mass communications (pp. 166–194). Middlesex, England: Penguin.

38.

Rubin

(2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In Bryant

Zillman

(Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 525–548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

39.

Satterlund

McCaul

Sandgren

(2003). Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3, e15.

40.

Sharf

(1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the internet. Women & Health, 26(1), 65–84.

41.

Talosig-Garcia

Davis

(2005). Information-seeking behavior of minority breast cancer patients: An exploratory study. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 53–64.

42.

Van Uden-Kraan

Drossaert

Taal

Shaw

Seydel

Van de Laar

(2008). Empowering process and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 405–417.

43.

Winzelberg

Classen

Alpers

Roberts

Koopman

Adams

(2003). Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer, 97, 1164–1173.

44.

Wise

Han

Shaw

McTavish

Gustafson

(2008). Effects of using online and didactic information on healthcare participation for breast cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 70, 348–356.