The concept of hybridity is increasingly employed as an analytical tool to explore the varieties and outcomes of externally led interventions, and in some cases is portrayed as a desirable political project that could stimulate alternative and counter hegemonic programming. This article critically explores this trend in peace and development studies by examining some of the tenets and critiques of the concept of hybridity with the aim of furthering its development as a useful conceptual tool. It also explores the underlying normative implications and rhetoric that underpin some of the work on hybridity in these fields. In doing so, it offers a set of queries that could be used to explore practices, impacts and potential alternatives in peace and development programming.
The Post-colonial Studies ReaderAshcroftB.GriffithsG.TiffinH.London: Routledge1995.
3.
AshcroftB.GriffithsG.TiffinH. (2000). Post-colonial Studies: The Key ConceptsAbingdon, UK: Routledge.
4.
AshcroftB.GriffithsG.TiffinH. (2002). The Empire Writes Back 2nd edLondon: Routledge.
5.
AutesserreS. (2010). The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International PeacekeepingNew York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BakhtinM. (1981). The Dialogic ImaginationAustin: University of Texas Press Translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist.
7.
BhabhaH.K. (1985). Signs Taken for Wonders. The Post-colonial Studies ReaderAshcroftB.GriffithsG.TiffinH.London: Routledge29–35.
8.
BhabhaH.K. (1988). Cultural Diversity and Cultural Differences. The Post-colonial Studies ReaderAshcroftB.GriffithsG.TiffinH.London: Routledge206–209.
9.
BhabhaH.K. (1994). The Location of CultureAbingdon, UK: Routledge.
10.
ChildsP.WilliamsR.J.P. (1997). An Introduction to Post-colonial TheoryHemel Hempsted, UK: Prentice Hall.
11.
DrichelS. (2008). The Time of Hybridity. Philosophy & Social Criticism34, 6587–615.
12.
DuffieldM. (2001). Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and SecurityLondon: Zed Books.
13.
DuffieldM. (2007). Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of PeoplesCambridge: Polity Press.
14.
DuffieldM. (2008). Global Civil War: The Non-Insured, International Containment and Post-interventionary Society. Journal of Refugee Studies21, 2Special Issue: Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development145–146.
15.
FindleyT. (1984). Not Wanted on the VoyageLondon: Arena.
16.
GhandiL. (1998). Postcolonial Theory: A Critical IntroductionSt Leonards, UK: Allen and Unwin.
17.
GilroyP. (1993). The Black AtlanticLondon: Verso.
18.
Global Governance (2012). Special Issue: Hybrid Peace Governance. 18, 11–132.
19.
HeathershawJ. (2009). Post-conflict Tajikistan: The Politics of Peacebuilding and the Emergence of Legitimate OrderMilton Park: Routledge.
20.
HeathershawJ.LambachD. (2008). Introduction: Post-conflict Spaces and Approaches to Statebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding2, 1269–289.
21.
HutnykJ. (2003). The Chapatti Story: How Hybridity as Theory Displaced Maoism as Politics in Subaltern Studies. Contemporary South Asia12, 4481–491.
22.
HutnykJ. (2005). Hybridity. Ethnic and Racial Studies28, 179–102.
23.
KraidyM.M. (2005). Hybridity, or the Cultural Logic of GlobalizationPhiladelphia: Temple University Press.
24.
LoombaA. (1991). Overworlding the “Third World”. Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A ReaderWilliamsP.ChrismanL.Hemel Hempsted, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf305–323.
25.
Mac GintyR. (2010). Hybrid Peace: The Interaction between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Peace. Security Dialogue41, 4391–412.
26.
Mac GintyR. (2011). International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of PeaceBasingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
McClintockA. (1992). The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-colonialism”. Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A ReaderWilliamsP.ChrismanL.Hemel Hempsted, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf291–304.
28.
MoreirasA. (1999). Hybridity and Double Consciousness. Cultural Studies13, 3373–407.
29.
MossL. (2003). The Politics of Everyday Hybridity: Zadie Smith's White Teeth. Wasafiri: The Magazine of International Contemporary Writing18, 3911–17.
30.
PieterseJ.N. (2001). Hybridity, So What? The Anti-hybridity Backlash and the Riddles of Recognition. Theory, Culture & Society18, 2–3219–245.
31.
PughM. (2011). Local Agency and Political Economies of Peacebuilding. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism11, 2Special Issue: Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development308–320.
32.
RichmondO. (2010). Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace. Millennium: Journal of International Studies38, 3665–692.
33.
RichmondO. (2011a). Critical Agency, Resistance and a Post-colonial Civil Society. Cooperation and Conflict46, 4419–440.
34.
RichmondO. (2011b). De-romanticising the Local, Demystifying the International: Hybridity in Timor Leste and the Solomon Islands. The Pacific Review24, 1115–136.
35.
Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalismRichmondO.MitchellA.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan2011a.
36.
RichmondO.MitchellA. (2011b). Introduction – Towards a Post-liberal Peace: Exploring Hybridity via Everyday Forms of Resistance, Agency and Autonomy. Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalismRichmondO.MitchellA.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan1–38.
37.
ShohatE. (1992). Notes on the “Post-colonial”. Social Text10, 2–399–113.
38.
SmithZ. (2000). White TeethLondon: Hamish Hamilton.
39.
SpivakG.C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?. The Post-colonial Studies ReaderAshcroftB.GriffithsG.TiffinH.London: Routledge24–28.
40.
TanikellaL. (2003). The Politics of Hybridity: Race, Gender, and Nationalism in Trinidad. Cultural Dynamics15, 2Special Issue: Hybridity in Peacebuilding and Development153–181.
41.
WerbnerP. (2001). The Limits of Cultural Hybridity: On Ritual Monsters, Poetic License and Contested Post-colonial Purifications. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute7, 1133–152.
