The fatigue behaviours were evaluated on a novel zirconia dental restoration known as self-glazed zirconia (SG), prepared by a precision additive 3D gel deposition approach, compared with a conventional zirconia (CZ) restoration, shaped by CNC milling of zirconia blanks made by cold isostatic pressing. Eight fixed partial dentures made by each method were subjected to fracture test, without or with the application of 5-million fatigue cycles, respectively. The processing defects, grain size, and t–m phase transformation were examined by SEM and XRD. The results revealed that the fracture force of the SG restorations was higher than that of the CZ restorations in both cases, which ascribed to the fact that more voids and larger grains in the conventional versus in the SG restorations. The t–m phase transformation was observed only on the fracture surfaces of both materials subjected to fatigue test. Both zirconia restorations meet the clinical requirement.
SailerI, FeherA, FilserF, Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:383–388.
5.
RuedaAO, AngladaM, Jimenez-PiqueE.Contact fatigue of veneer feldspathic porcelain on dental zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015;31:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.006
6.
LohbauerU, PetscheltA, GreilP.Lifetime prediction of CAD/CAM dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:780–785. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10468
7.
ShenZJ, LiuLF, XuXQ, Fractography of self-glazed zirconia with improved reliability. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008.
8.
KwonMS, OhSY, ChoSA.Two-body wear comparison of zirconia crown, gold crown, and enamel against zirconia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;47:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.029
9.
StoberT, BermejoJL, SchwindlingFS, Clinical assessment of enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43:621–629. doi: 10.1111/joor.12409
10.
MundheK, JainV, PruthiG, Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:358–363. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.001
11.
StoberT, BermejoJL, RammelsbergP, Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41:314–322. doi: 10.1111/joor.12139
12.
SripetchdanondJ, LeevailojC.Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1141–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006
13.
HaraM, TakumaY, SatoT, Wear performance of bovine tooth enamel against translucent tetragonal zirconia polycrystals after different surface treatments. Dent Mater J. 2014;33:811–817. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-097
14.
JanyavulaS, LawsonN, CakirD, The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:22–29. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0
15.
LohbauerU, ReichS.Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1165–1172. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1872-6
16.
PassosSP, TorrealbaY, MajorP, In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:593–601.
17.
ChongBJ, ThangavelAK, RoltonSB, Clinical and laboratory surface finishing procedures for zirconia on opposing human enamel wear: a laboratory study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;50:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.007
18.
PreisV, SchmalzbauerM, BougeardD, Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent. 2015;43:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.011
19.
JungYS, LeeJW, ChoiYJ, A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2:111–115. doi: 10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.111
20.
AmerR, KurkluD, KateebE, Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1151–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.021
21.
ParkJH, ParkS, LeeK, Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.002
22.
LawsonNC, JanyavulaS, SyklawerS, Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing. J Dent. 2014;42:1586–1591. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.008
KosmacT, OblakC, JevnikarP, The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 1999;15:426–433. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-6
25.
OblakC, VerdenikI, SwainMV, Survival-rate analysis of surface treated dental zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25:2255–2264. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5217-1
26.
LiuY, WangY, WangD, Self-glazed zirconia reducing the wear to tooth enamel. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36:2889–2894. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029
27.
AdolfssonE, ShenZ.Effects of granule density on strength and granule related defects in zirconia. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32:2653–2659. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.059
28.
OzcanM, JonaschM.Effect of cyclic fatigue tests on aging and their translational implications for survival of all-ceramic tooth-borne single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2016. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12566
29.
ChaarMS, WitkowskiS, StrubJR, Effect of veneering technique on the fracture resistance of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:51–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02323.x
30.
JingZ, KeZ, YihongL, Effect of multistep processing technique on the formation of micro-defects and residual stresses in zirconia dental restorations. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:206–212. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12094
31.
AboushelibMN, WangH, KleverlaanCJ, Fatigue behavior of zirconia under different loading conditions. Dent Mater. 2016;32:915–920. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.012
32.
TaskonakB, GriggsJA, MecholskyJJ, Analysis of subcritical crack growth in dental ceramics using fracture mechanics and fractography. Dent Mater. 2008;24:700–707. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.08.001
33.
CoelhoPG, SilvaNR, BonfanteEA, Fatigue testing of two porcelain-zirconia all-ceramic crown systems. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1122–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.009
34.
ZhangY, PajaresA, LawnBR.Fatigue and damage tolerance of Y-TZP ceramics in layered biomechanical systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71:166–171.
35.
FischerH, WeberM, MarxR.Lifetime prediction of all-ceramic bridges by computational methods. J Dent Res.2003;82(3):238–242. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200317
KohorstP, DittmerMP, BorchersL, Influence of cyclic fatigue in water on the load-bearing capacity of dental bridges made of zirconia. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1440–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.012
38.
ZhangY, LawnBR.Fatigue sensitivity of Y-TZP to microscale sharp-contact flaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;72B:388–392. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30174
39.
LiuY, FengH, BaoY, Fracture and interfacial delamination origins of bilayer ceramic composites for dental restorations. J Eur Ceram Soc.2010;30:1297–1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.11.019
40.
MottaAB, PereiraLC, da CunhaAR, The influence of the loading mode on the stress distribution on the connector region of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic fixed partial denture. Artif Organs.2008;32(4):283–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00544.x
41.
DittmerMP, BorchersL, StieschM, Stresses and distortions within zirconia-fixed dental prostheses due to the veneering process. Acta Biomater.2009;5(8):3231–3239. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.025
42.
HjerppeJ, VallittuPK, FrobergK, Effect of sintering time on biaxial strength of zirconium dioxide. Dent Mater. 2009;25:166–171. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.011
43.
MotaYA, CotesC, CarvalhoRF, Monoclinic phase transformation and mechanical durability of zirconia ceramic after fatigue and autoclave aging. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33720
44.
LucasTJ, LawsonNC, JanowskiGM, Effect of grain size on the monoclinic transformation, hardness, roughness, and modulus of aged partially stabilized zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1487–1492. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.014
45.
HallmannL, MehlA, UlmerP, The influence of grain size on low-temperature degradation of dental zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100B:447–456. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31969
46.
GarvieRC.The occurrence of metastable tetragonal zirconia as a crystallite size effect. J Phys Chem C. 1965;69:1238–1243. doi: 10.1021/j100888a024
47.
GarvieRC.Stabilization of the tetragonal structure in zirconia microcrystals. J Phys Chem C. 1978;82:218–224. doi: 10.1021/j100491a016
48.
PittayachawanP, McDonaldA, PetrieA, The biaxial flexural strength and fatigue property of Lava Y-TZP dental ceramic. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1018–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.09.003
49.
KimHT, HanJS, YangJH, The effect of low temperature aging on the mechanical property & phase stability of Y-TZP ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009;1:113–117. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.113
50.
RandA, KohorstP, GreulingA, Stress distribution in all-ceramic posterior 4-unit fixed dental prostheses supported in different ways: finite element analysis. Implant Dent.2016;25(4):485–491. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000429
