Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control

Abstract

Interference in the Eriksen flanker task has been shown to be reduced when the (relative) frequency of conflicting stimuli is increased, a modulation thought to reflect a higher degree of processing selectivity under conditions of frequent conflict (Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001). Previous studies suggest that stimulus location acts as a contextual cue, resulting in location-specific adjustment of processing selectivity when different locations are associated with differential conflict frequencies (Corballis & Gratton, 2003; Wendt, Kluwe, & Vietze, 2008). In the current study we extend these findings by showing that not only stimulus location but also stimulus colour can be used for context-specific adjustments. These findings suggest that processing selectivity is adjusted in parallel with current stimulus processing, potentially serving to resolve a current conflict rather than to prepare for an upcoming new conflict.

Keywords

Cognitive control Processing selectivity Conflict-frequency Context Associative learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Awh

Pashler

(2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, 834–846.

Botvinick

M. M.

Braver

T. S.

Barch

D. M.

Carter

C. S.

Cohen

J. D.

(2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108, 624–652.

Cave

K. R.

Wolfe

J. M.

(1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology 22, 225–271.

Connelly

S. L.

Hasher

(1993). Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19, 1238–1250.

Corballis

P. M.

Gratton

(2003). Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology 64, 191–209.

Crump

M. J. C.

Gong

Milliken

(2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop-effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 316–321.

Crump

M. J. C.

Vaquero

J. M. M.

Milliken

(2008). Context-specific learning and control: The role of awareness, task-relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness & Cognition 17, 22–36.

Eriksen

B. A.

Eriksen

C. W.

(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 143–149.

Eriksen

C. W.

St James

J. D.

(1986). Perception & Psychophysics Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoomlens model 40, 225–240.

10.

Gratton

Coles

M. G. H.

Donchin

(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121, 480–506.

11.

Hommel

Proctor

R. W.

K.-P.

(2004). A feature integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 68, 1–17.

12.

Jacoby

L. L.

Lindsay

D. S.

Hessels

(2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 638–644.

13.

Kerns

J. G.

Cohen

J. D.

MacDonald

A. W.

III Cho

R. Y.

Stenger

V. A.

Carter

C S.

(2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303, 1023–1026.

14.

Kraft

Müller

N. G.

Hagendorf

Schira

M. M.

Dick

Fendrich

R. M.

(2005). Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: Implications for the splitting attention debate. Cognitive Brain Research 24, 19–32.

15.

Malinowski

Fuchs

Müller

M. M.

(2007). Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield. Neuroscience Letters 414, 65–70.

16.

Mayr

Awh

Laurey

(2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience 6, 450–452.

17.

Miller

(1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics 41, 419–434.

18.

Treisman

A. M.

(1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A, 201–237.

19.

Treisman

A. M.

Gormican

(1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 95, 15–48.

20.

Van der Heijden

A. H. C.

(1993). The role of position in object selection in vision. Psychological Research 56, 44–58.

21.

Vierck

Miller

(2005). Direct selection by color for visual encoding. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 483–494.

22.

Wendt

Heldmann

Münte

T. F.

Kluwe

R. H.

(2007). Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulus–response repetition using brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19, 1104–1112.

23.

Wendt

Kluwe

R. H.

Peters

(2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32, 644–667.

24.

Wendt

Kluwe

R. H.

Vietze

(2008). Location-specific vs. hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 135–140.

25.

Wendt

Luna-Rodriguez

(in press). Conflict-frequency-dependent modulation of flanker interference: Attentional adjustment or stimulus-specific practice?. Experimental Psychology.