Experiment 1 established the effectiveness of an appetitive conditioning of odours procedure with snails (Helix aspersa) that was subsequently used for the study of blocking. In this important phenomenon, the conditioning of a CS1 (where CS is the conditioned stimulus) prior to conditioning of a compound, CS1CS2, blocked the conditioning to the CS2. Experiments 2a, 2b, and 2c demonstrated this associative effect using three different experimental controls. Experiments 3a and 3b replicated the blocking effect and allowed us to reject an explanation of blocking based on generalized effects of several treatments of diverse stimuli in blocking and control groups (the pseudoblocking effect). The implications of these results for the study of invertebrate cognition by means of conditioning techniques are discussed.
AbramsonC. I. (1994). A primer of invertebrate learning: The behavioral perspectiveWashington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
BittermanM. E. (1988). Vertebrate–invertebrate comparisons.Intelligence and evolutionary biology. JerisonH. J.JerisonI.Berlin, Germany: Springer251–276.
3.
BittermanM. E. (2006). Classical conditioning since Pavlov.Review of General Psychology4, 365–376.
4.
BlaserR. E.CouvillonP. A.BittermanM. E. (2004). Backward blocking in honeybees.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57B, 349–360.
5.
BlaserR. E.CouvillonP. A.BittermanM. E. (2006). Blocking and pseudoblocking: New control experiments with honeybees.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology59, 68–76.
6.
CouvillonP. A.ArakakiL.BittermanM. E. (1997). Intramodal blocking in honeybees.Animal Learning & Behavior25, 277–282.
7.
CouvillonP. A.CamposA. C.BassT. D.BittermanM. E. (2001). Intermodal blocking in honeybees.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54B, 369–381.
8.
DomjanM. (2005). Pavlovian conditioning: A functional perspective.Annual Review of Psychology56, 179–506.
9.
FarleyJ.IksungJ.HaojiangH.KimJ.-I. (2004). Chemosensory conditioning in molluscs: II. A critical review.Learning & Behavior32, 277–288.
10.
FunayamaE. S.CouvillonP. A.BittermanM. E. (1995). Compound conditioning in honeybees: Blocking tests of the independence assumption.Animal Learning & Behavior23, 429–437.
11.
GuezD.MillerR. R. (2008). Blocking and pseudoblocking: The reply of Rattus norvegicus to Appis melifera.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61, 1186–1198.
12.
KaminL. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning.Punishment and aversive behavior. CampbellB. A.ChurchR. M.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
13.
KemenesG.BenjaminP. R. (1989). Appetitive learning in snails shows characteristics of conditioning in vertebrates.Brain Research489, 163–166.
14.
LoyI.FernándezV.AcebesF. (2006). Conditioning of tentacle lowering in the snail (Helix aspersa): Conditioning, latent inhibition, overshadowing, second-order conditioning, and sensory preconditioning.Learning & Behavior34, 305–314.
15.
MackintoshN. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learningNew York: Oxford University Press.
16.
MillerR. R.MatuteH. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General125, 370–386.
17.
PeschelM.StraubV.TeykeT. (1996). Consequences of food-attraction conditioning in Helix: A behavioral and electrophysiological study.Journal of Comparative Physiology, A178, 317–327.
18.
PineñoO.UrushiharaK.StoutS.FussJ.MillerR. R. (2006). When more is less: Extending training of the blocking association following compound training attenuates the blocking effect.Learning & Behavior34, 21–36.
19.
RescorlaR. A. (1971). Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement following prior inhibitory conditioning.Learning and Motivation2, 113–123.
20.
SahleyC. L.GelperinA.RudyJ. W. (1981). An analysis of associative learning in a terrestrial mollusc. I. Higher-order conditioning, blocking and a transient US pre-exposure effect.Journal of Comparative Physiology, A144, 1–8.
21.
UnglessM. A. (1998). A Pavlovian analysis of food-attraction conditioning in the snail Helix aspersa.Animal Learning & Behavior26, 15–19.
22.
UnglessM. A. (2001). Dissociation of food-finding and tentacle-lowering, following food-attraction conditioning in the snail.Helix aspersa. Behavioral Processes53, 97–101.
