Further analyses of the effects of practice,dropout,sex,socio-economic advantage,and recruitment cohort differences during the University of Manchester longitudinal study of cognitive change in old age
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2009
Further analyses of the effects of practice,dropout,sex,socio-economic advantage,and recruitment cohort differences during the University of Manchester longitudinal study of cognitive change in old age
A sample of 4,314 volunteers who, when first recruited, were aged from 41 to 93 years were quadrennially tested from 2 to 4 occasions during the next 4 to 20 years on the Cattell Culture Fair intelligence test, 2 tests of information-processing speed, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) vocabulary test, and 3 memory tests. After significant effects of practice, sex, demographics, socio-economic advantage, and recruitment cohort had been identified and considered, performance on all tests declined with age. These age-related declines accelerated for the Cattell and WAIS, 2 tests of information speed, and 2 of the memory tests. For all tests individuals’ trajectories of age-related change diverged with increasing age but, unexpectedly, were not affected by demographic factors. Practice gains from an initial experience of the cognitive tests remained undiminished as the interval before the second experience increased from 4 to 8 + years.
BirrenJ. E.Tutorial review of changes in choice reaction time with advancing ageBayer symposium, No 6. Bonn, GermanyBaumeisterH.Springer-Verlag1979232–247.
2.
BirrenJ. E.WoodsA. M.WilliamsM. V. (1980). Behavioural slowing with age.Aging in the 1980's: Psychological issues. PoonL. W.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association293–308.
3.
CattellR. B.CattellA. K. S. (1960). Handbook for the individual or group Culture Fair intelligence testChampaign, IL: IPAT.
4.
DiggleP. J.LiangK. Y.ZegerS. L. (1994). Analysis of longitudinal dataOxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
DikmenS. S.HeatonR. K.GrantJ.TemkinN. R. (1999). Test–retest reliability and practice effects of Expanded Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society5, 346–356.
6.
HeimA. W. (1970). AH4 group test of general intelligenceWindsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
7.
HertzogC.NesselroadeJ. R. (2003). Assessing psychological change in adulthood: An overview of methodological issues.Psychology and Aging18, 639–657.
8.
HouxP. J. (1991). Rigorous health screening reduces age effects on a memory scanning task.Brain and Cognition15, 246–260.
9.
KulikJ. A.Chen-LinC.KulikR. L.BangertL. (1984). Effects of practice on aptitude and achievement test scores.American Educational Research Journal21, 435–447.
10.
LachmanR.LachmanJ. L.TaylorD. W. (1982). Reallocation of mental resources over the productive lifespan: Assumptions and task analyses.Aging and the cognitive process. CraikF. I. M.TrehubS.New York: Plenum Press.
11.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing dataNew York: Wiley.
12.
LittleT. D.LindenbergerU.MaierH. (2000). Selectivity and generalizability in longitudinal research: On the effects of continuers and dropouts.Modelling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples. LittleT. D.SchanabelK. U.BaumertJ.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.187–200.
13.
LynnR. (1999). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A developmental theory.Intelligence27, 1–12.
14.
MitrushimaM.SatzP. (1991). Effect of repeated administration of a neuropsychological test battery in the elderly.Journal of Clinical Psychology47, 790–801.
15.
NagiM. H.StockwellE. G. (1973). Socioeconomic differentials in mortality by cause of death.Health Services Reports88, 449–456.
16.
Office of Population Censuses and SurveysClassification of occupations 1980London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office1980.
17.
PinheiroJ. C.BatesD. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUSNew York: Springer.
18.
RabbittP.DiggleP.HollandF.McInnesL. (2004a). Practice and drop-out effect during a 17-year longitudinal study of cognitive aging.Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences59, 84–97.
19.
RabbittP.DiggleP.HollandF.McInnesL.BentN.AbsonV. (2004b). The University of Manchester Longitudinal Study of Cognition in Normal Healthy Old Age, 1983 through 2003.Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition11, 245–279.
20.
RabbittP.DiggleP.SmithD.HollandF.McInnesL. (2001). Identifying and separating the effects of practice and of cognitive ageing during a large longitudinal study of elderly community residents.Neuropsychologia39, 532–543.
21.
RabbittP.LunnM.WongD. (2005). Neglect of dropout underestimates effects of death in longitudinal studies.Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences60, 106–109.
22.
RabbittP. M.LunnM.WongD. (2008a). Death, dropout and cognitive change in old age Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
RabbittP.LunnM.WongD. (2008b). Practice, age and ability in longitudinal studies of cognition Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
RabbittP.WatsonP.DonlanC.BentN.McInnesL. (1994). Subject attrition in a longitudinal study of cognitive performance in community resident elderly people.Facts and research in gerontology: Epidemiology and aging. VellasB. J.AlbarendeJ. L.GarryP. J.Paris: Serdi29–34.
25.
RavenJ. C. (1965). The Mill Hill Vocabulary ScaleLondon: H. K. Lewis.
26.
RubinD. B. (1976). Inference and missing dataNew York: Biometrika Trust.
27.
SalthouseT. A. (1985). A theory of cognitive agingAmsterdam: North Holland.
28.
SalthouseT. A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives in cognitive agingHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
Van BoxtelM. P. J.BuntinxF.HouxP. J.MetsemakersJ. F. M.KnottnerusA.JollesJ. (1998). The relationship between morbidity and cognitive performance in a normal aging population.Journals of Gerontology, Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences53, M147–M154.
