Recent evidence suggests that the notion that the visual system can rapidly extract summary statistics from complex scenes extends to representing sets of faces in terms of mean emotion or gender. Here we show that observers can also extract a mean identity from a set of faces with different identities. Observers first saw a set of four faces with different identities and were subsequently asked whether or not a single test face had been present in the preceding set. They were significantly more likely to respond that the test face had been present in the set if it was the morphed mean of all four set faces than when it was an actual set member. This finding suggests that representations based on summary statistics are available for face identity.
CabezaR.BruceV.KatoT.OdaM. (1999). The prototype effect in face recognition: Extension and limits.Memory and Cognition27, 139–151.
6.
ChongS. C.TreismanA. (2003). Representing of statistical properties.Vision Research43, 393–404.
7.
ChongS. C.TreismanA. (2005a). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays.Perception and Psychophysics67, 1–13.
8.
ChongS. C.TreismanA. (2005b). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups.Vision Research45, 891–900.
9.
DakinS. C.WattR. J. (1997). The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture.Vision Research37, 3181–3192.
10.
De FockertJ.MarchantA. (2008). Attention modulates set representation by statistical properties.Perception & Psychophysics70, 789–794.
11.
EkmanP.MatsumotoD. (1993). Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE) and Japanese and Caucasian Neutral Faces (JACNeuF)Cerrito, El, CA: The Paul Ekman Group Available from www.ekmangroup.com.
12.
FiserJ.AslinR. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.Psychological Science12, 499–504.
13.
HabermanJ.WhitneyD. (2007). Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces.Current Biology17, 751–753.
14.
HabermanJ.WhitneyD. (in press). Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
15.
MartinezA. M.BenaventeR. (1998). The AR Face Data Base (CVC Tech. Rep. No. 24).
16.
MesserK.MatasJ.KittlerJ.LuettinJ.MaitreG.XMT2VTSdb: The Extended M2VTS DatabaseProceedings of 2nd Conference on Audio and Video-base Biometric Personal Verification. Springer VerlagNew York1999.
17.
ParkesL.LundJ.AngelucciA.SolomonJ.MorganM. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.Nature Neuroscience4, 739–744.
SimmonsA.MatthewsS. C.PaulusM. P.SteinM. B. (2008). Intolerance of uncertainty correlates with insula activation during affective ambiguity.Neuroscience Letters430, 92–97.
20.
SimmonsA.SteinM. B.MatthewsS. C.FeinsteinJ. S.PaulusM. P. (2006). Affective ambiguity for a group recruits ventromedial prefrontal cortex.NeuroImage29, 655–661.
21.
SolsoR. L.McCarthyJ. E. (1981). Prototype formation of faces: A case of pseudo-memory.British Journal of Psychology72, 499–503.
22.
WatamaniukS. N. J.DuchonA. (1992). The human visual system averages speed information.Vision Research32, 931–942.
23.
WilliamsD. W.SekulerR. (1984). Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions.Vision Research24, 55–62.
