This paper summarizes the theory of simple cumulative risks—for example, the risk of food poisoning from the consumption of a series of portions of tainted food. Problems concerning such risks are extraordinarily difficult for naïve individuals, and the paper explains the reasons for this difficulty. It describes how naïve individuals usually attempt to estimate cumulative risks, and it outlines a computer program that models these methods. This account predicts that estimates can be improved if problems of cumulative risk are framed so that individuals can focus on the appropriate subset of cases. The paper reports two experiments that corroborated this prediction. They also showed that whether problems are stated in terms of frequencies (80 out of 100 people got food poisoning) or in terms of percentages (80% of people got food poisoning) did not reliably affect accuracy.
BefordT. M.CookeR. (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methodsCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
CasscellsW.SchoenbergerA.GrayboysT. (1978). Interpretation by clinicians of clinical laboratory reports.New England Journal of Clinical Medicine299, 999–1000.
3.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty.Cognition58, 1–73.
4.
DiamondW. D. (1990). Effects of describing long-term risks as cumulative or non-cumulative.Basic and Applied Social Psychology11, 4405–419.
5.
DoyleJ. K. (1997). Judging cumulative risk.Journal of Applied Social Psychology27, 6500–524.
6.
EddyD. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities.Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
EvansJ. St. B. T.HandleyS. J.PerhamN.OverD. E.ThompsonV. A. (2000). Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.Cognition78, 247–276.
8.
GigerenzerG.HoffrageU. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review102, 4684–704.
9.
GirottoV.GonzalezM. (2001). Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form.Cognition78, 247–276.
10.
GirottoV.GonzalezM. (2002). Chances and frequencies in probabilistic reasoning: Rejoinder to Hoffrage, Gigerenzer, Krauss & Martingnon.Cognition84, 3353–359.
11.
HammertonM. (1973). A case of radical probability estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology101, 252–254.
12.
HoffrageU.GigerenzerG.KraussS.MartingnonL. (2002). Representation facilitates reasoning: What natural frequencies are and what they are not.Cognition84, 3343–352.
13.
Johnson-LairdP. N.ByrneR. M. J. (1991). DeductionHove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
14.
Johnson-LairdP. N.ByrneR. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.Psychological Review109, 646–678.
15.
Johnson-LairdP. N.LegrenziP.GirottoV.Sonino-LegrenziM.CaverniJ.-P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning.Psychological Review106, 162–88.
16.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biasesCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates.Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KnäuperB.KornikR.AtkinsonK.GubermanC.AydinC. (2005). Motivation influences the underestimation of cumulative risk.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31, 111511–1523.
19.
KoehlerJ. J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative and methodological challenges.Behavioral and Brain Sciences19, 1–53.
20.
MacchiL. (1995). Pragmatic aspects of the base-rate fallacy.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology48A, 188–207.
21.
MacchiL. (2000). Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes82, 217–236.
22.
ShakleeH.FischhoffB. (1990). The psychology of contraceptive surprises: Cumulative risk and contraceptive effectiveness.Journal of Applied Social Psychology20, 385–403.
23.
SlomanS. AOverD.SlovakL.StibelJ. M. (2003). Frequency illusions and other fallacies.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes91, 296–309.
24.
SlovicP. (2000). What does it mean to know a cumulative risk? Adolescents’ perceptions of short-term and long-term consequences of smoking.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making13, 259–266.
25.
SlovicP.FischhoffB.LichtensteinS. (1982). Accident probabilities and seat-belt usage: A psychological perspective.Accident Analysis and Prevention10, 281–285.
26.
SvensonO. (1984). Cognitive processes in judging cumulative risk over different periods of time.Organisational Behavior and Human Performance33, 22–41.
27.
SvensonO. (1985). Cognitive strategies in a complex judgment task: Analyses of concurrent verbal reports and judgments of cumulative risk over different exposure times.Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes36, 1–15.
28.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review90, 293–315.
