The Visual Discrimination of Shape by Octopus: The Effects of Stimulus Size

Abstract

Octopuses were trained in a successive situation to discriminate between vertical and horizontal rectangles: Group S was trained with rectangles of side length 5 × 1 cm., Group M with 10 × 2 cm. rectangles, and Group L with 20 × 4 cm. rectangles. The larger the shapes used, the more readily were they discriminated, both in terms of speed of learning and of the asymptote of performance. After training, each group was given transfer tests with the two pairs of rectangles not used in training and with two further pairs of 2.5 × 0.5 cm. and 40 × 8 cm. The results can be summarized in three generalizations: (1) When the size of a shape is changed, performance is worse than on the original training shape. (2) The bigger the change in proportionate size, the less transfer is shown. (3) For corresponding changes of proportionate size, there is better transfer to larger shapes than to smaller. These generalizations are supported by data from earlier experiments on the question of transfer to different sized shapes: some of these data were reworked and are presented in detail here. The theoretical implications of the results are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dodwell

P. C.

(1957). Shape recognition in rats. Brit. J. Psychol. 48, 221–9.

Parriss

J. R.

Young

J. Z.

(1962). The limits of transfer of a learned discrimination to figures of larger and smaller sizes. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 45, 618–35.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1957). Visual discrimination of orientation by Octopus. Brit. J. Psychol. 48, 55–71.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1958). Visual discrimination of shape by Octopus. Squares and triangles. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 10, 40–47.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1959a). A test of a theory of shape discrimination in Octopus vulgaris Lamarck. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 52, 135–41.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1959b). Visual discrimination of shape by Octopus. Circles and squares, and circles and triangles. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 11, 24–32.

Sutherland

N. S.

Stimulus analysing mechanisms. Proceedings of a Symposium on the Mechanization of Thought Processes. London 1959c Vol. II.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1960a). Visual discrimination of shape by Octopus: Squares and rectangles. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 53, 95–103.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1960b). Visual discrimination of orientation by Octopus: Mirror images. Brit. J. Psychol. 51, 9–18.

10.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1960c). Visual discrimination of shape by Octopus: Open and closed forms. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 53, 104–12.

11.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1961a). Discrimination of horizontal and vertical extents by Octopus. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 54, 43–8.

12.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1961b). The methods and findings of experiments on the visual discrimination of shape by animals. Exp. psychol. Soc. Monogr. 1.

13.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1963a). The discrimination of stationary shapes by Octopus: Further open and closed forms. Amer. J. Psychol. in press.

14.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1963b). The visual discrimination of stripe width by Octopus. Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli in press.

15.

Sutherland

N. S.

Muntz

W. R. A.

(1959). Simultaneous discrimination training and preferred direction of motion in visual discrimination of shape in Octopus vulgaris Lamarck. Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli 31, 109–26.

16.

Warren

J. M.

(1953). Effect of geometrical regularity on visual form discrimination by monkeys. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 46, 237–40.

17.

Young

J. Z.

(1960). The visual system of Octopus. (1) Regularities in the retina and optic lobes of Octopus in relation to form discrimination. Nature 186, 836–9.