On the joint effects of repetition and stimulus quality in lexical decision: Looking to the past for a new way forward

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the joint effects of stimulus quality and repetition in the context of lexical decision. Experiment 1 yielded an interaction between repetition and stimulus quality for words (but additive effects for nonwords) when the lag was short, replicating previous reports. Experiment 2, with a much longer lag than Experiment 1, yielded main effects of stimulus quality and repetition, but these factors no longer interact. The joint effects of stimulus quality and repetition for words as a function of lag can be understood in terms of two loci for repetition effects: one short-term and one long-term. The transient effect of repetition is on activation levels in the lexicons (and in which the input lexicon, but not beyond, is affected by stimulus quality), whereas the long-term effect is on the strength of two-way connections between lexical–lexical and lexical–semantic modules. These data and others, taken together with the account, provide a new way of thinking about a 30-year-old conundrum.

Keywords

Lexical decision Word recognition Repetition Stimulus quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashby

F. G.

(1982). Deriving exact predictions from the cascade model. Psychological Review 89, 599–607.

Besner

Moroz

O'Malley

(2011). On the strength of connections between localist mental representations as a source of frequency/familiarity effects. Psychological Science 22, 3 393–398.

Besner

O'Malley

Robidoux

(2010). On the joint effect of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: New challenges. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 36, 750–764.

Besner

Roberts

M. A.

(2003). Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 398–404.

Besner

Smith

M. C.

(1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 18, 468–482.

Besner

Swan

(1982). Models of lexical access in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 34A, 2 313–325.

Besner

Wartek

Robidoux

(2008). Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34, 242–250.

Blais

Besner

(2007). Reading aloud: When the effect of stimulus quality distinguishes between cascaded and thresholded components. Experimental Psychology 54, 215–224.

Borowsky

Besner

(1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19, 813–840.

10.

Bowers

J. S.

Damian

Havelka

(2002). Can distributed orthographic knowledge support word specific long-term priming? Apparently so. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 24–38.

11.

Coltheart, M. (2004). Are there lexicons? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1153?1171.

12.

Coltheart

Rastle

Perry

Langdon

Ziegler

(2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108, 1 204–256.

13.

den Heyer

Benson

(1988). Constraints on the additive relationship between semantic priming and word repetition and on the interactive relationship between semantic priming and stimulus clarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 42, 399–413.

14.

Forster, K. I. F., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 627?635.

15.

Logan

G. D.

(1988). Towards an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 95, 4 492–527.

16.

Maloney

Risko

E. F.

O'Malley

Besner

(2009). Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: On the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 858–867.

17.

McCann

R. S.

Besner

(1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13, 14–24.

18.

McClelland

J. L.

(1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review 86, 4 287–330.

19.

McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.

20.

McKone

(1995). Short-term implicit memory for words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21 5 1108–1126.

21.

Monsell

(1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. Besner

Humphreys

G. W.

Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 148–197.

22.

Morris

C. D.

Bransford

J. D.

Franks

J. J.

(1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 16, 5 519–533.

23.

Morton

(1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76, 2 165–178.

24.

Norris

(1984). The effects of frequency, repetition and stimulus quality in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A, 3 507–518.

25.

O'Malley

Besner

(2008). Reading aloud: Qualitative differences in the relation between word frequency and stimulus quality as a function of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 34, 1400–1411.

26.

Patterson

Plaut

D. C.

(2009). “Shallow draughts intoxicate the brain”: Lessons from cognitive science for cognitive neuropsychology. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 39–58.

27.

Perry

Ziegler

J. C.

Zorzi

(2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 114, 273–315.

28.

Raaijmakers

J. G. W.

(2003). A further look at the “that language-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy”. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57, 141–151.

29.

Raaijmakers

J. G. W.

Schrijnemakers

J. M. C.

Gremmen

(1999). How to deal with “The language-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 416–426.

30.

Reynolds

Besner

(2004). Neighbourhood density, word frequency and spelling–sound regularity effects in naming: Similarities and differences between skilled readers and the dual route cascaded computational model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58, 13–31.

31.

Roberts, S., & Sternberg, S. (1993). The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: Tests of three alternatives. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance: Vol. XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 611–653). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

32.

Rueckl

J. G.

(2003). A connectionist perspective on repetition priming. Bowers

J. S.

Marsolek

C. S.

Rethinking implicit memory Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 67–104.

33.

Scarborough

D. L.

Cortese

Scarborough

H. S.

(1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, 1 1–17.

34.

Stanners

R. F.

Jastrzembski

J. E.

Westbrook

(1975). Frequency and visual quality in a word–nonword classification task. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 14, 259–264.

35.

Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276?315.

36.

Sternberg

(1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. Scarborough

Sternberg

Invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 4. Methods, models, and conceptual issues Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 703–863.

37.

Visser

T. A. W.

Besner

(2001). On the dominance of whole-word knowledge in reading aloud. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 560–567.

38.

Wagenmakers

E. M.

Zeelenberg

Steyvers

Shiffrin

R. M.

Raaijmakers

J. G. W.

(2004). Nonword repetition in lexical decision: Support for two opposing processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A, 1191–1210.

39.

Yap

M. J.

Balota

D. A.

Tse

C. S.

Besner

(2008). On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 34, 495–513.

40.

Zeelenberg

Wagenmakers

E. M.

Shiffrin

R. M.

(2004). Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision reverses as a function of study task and speed stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30, 270–277.