We investigated the interaction between morphological structure and transposed-letter priming using the same–different task with Hebrew, a Semitic language in which morphology has been shown to play a key role in visual word recognition. In contrast to the results observed with lexical decision (e.g., Velan & Frost, 2009, 2011), a transposed-letter priming effect was observed irrespective of the morphological structure of the words. We take these results to suggest that morphological decomposition occurs only in the service of lexical access. We discuss further a unique feature of written Arabic, another Semitic language, to explain the apparent conflict between our findings and those reported by Perea, Abu Mallouh, García-Orza, and Carreiras (2010).
BoudelaaS.Marslen-WilsonW.D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic.Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 207–260.
2.
DuñabeitiaJ.A.KinoshitaS.CarreirasM.NorrisD. (2010). Is morph-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same–different task.Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 509–529.
3.
DuñabeitiaJ.A.PereaM.CarreirasM. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition.Cognition, 105, 691–703.
4.
ForsterK.I.ForsterJ.C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.
5.
FriedmannN.GvionA. (2001). Letter position dyslexia.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 673–696.
6.
FriedmannN.Haddad-HannaM. (in press). Letter position dyslexia in Arabic: From form to position.Behavioural Neurology,.
7.
FrostR.Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference?.How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology, and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice, PughK.McCradleP. (2009). Psychology PressNew York, NY235–254.
8.
GomezP.RatcliffR.PereaM. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding.Psychological Review, 115, 577–600.
9.
KinoshitaS.NorrisD. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of orthographic representations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 35, 1–18.
10.
LongtinC.M.MeunierF. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing.Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–51.
11.
NorrisD.KinoshitaS. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 433–455.
12.
NorrisD.KinoshitaS.van CasterenM. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order.Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254–271.
13.
PereaM.Abu MallouhR.CarreirasM. (2010). The search for an input coding scheme: Transposed letter priming in Arabic.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 375–380.
14.
PereaM.Abu MallouhR.García-OrzaJ.CarreirasM. (2010). Masked priming effects are modulated by expertise in the script.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 902–919.
15.
PereaM.LupkerS.J.Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming.Masked priming: The state of the art, KinoshitaS.LupkerS.J. (2003). Psychology PressHove, UK97–120.
16.
RastleK.DavisM.H.Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming.Masked priming: The state of the art, KinoshitaS.LupkerS.J. (2003). Psychology PressHove, UK279–305.
17.
RastleK.DavisM.H.NewB. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098.
18.
RuecklJ.G.RimzhimA. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morpheme boundaries.Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 482–508.
19.
SchoonbaertS.GraingerJ. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters.Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367.
20.
SeidenbergM.S.Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy?.Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading, ColtheartM. (1987). Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ245–263.
21.
VelanH.FrostR. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913–918.
22.
VelanH.FrostR. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew.Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 285–302.
23.
VelanH.FrostR. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?.Cognition, 118, 141–156.
