Stimulus quality and word frequency produce additive effects in lexical decision performance, whereas the semantic priming effect interacts with both stimulus quality and word frequency effects. This pattern places important constraints on models of visual word recognition. In Experiment 1, all three variables were investigated within a single speeded pronunciation study. The results indicated that the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency were dependent upon prime relatedness. In particular, an additive effect of stimulus quality and word frequency was found after related primes, and an interactive effect was found after unrelated primes. It was hypothesized that this pattern reflects an adaptive reliance on related prime information within the experimental context. In Experiment 2, related primes were eliminated from the list, and the interactive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency found following unrelated primes in Experiment 1 reverted to additive effects for the same unrelated prime conditions. The results are supportive of a flexible lexical processor that adapts to both local prime information and global list-wide context.
BalotaD.A.AbramsR.A.Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,199521, 1289–1302.
2.
BalotaD.A.YapM.J.Attentional control and flexible lexical processing: Explorations of the magic moment of word recognition.From inmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing,AndrewsS.Psychology PressHove, UK2006229–258.
3.
BalotaD.A.YapM.J.CorteseM.J.HutchisonK.A.KesslerB.LoftisB.The English Lexicon Project.Behavior Research Methods,200739, 445–459.
4.
BalotaD.A.YapM.J.CorteseM.J.WatsonJ.M.Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming.Journal of Memory and Language,200859, 495–523.
5.
BeckerC.A.Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,19795, 252–259.
6.
BeckerC.A.KillionT.H.Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,19773, 389–401.
7.
BesnerD.Visual language processing and additive effects of multiple factors on timed performance: A challenge for the interactive activation framework?,2006 Available from PsyCrit website, http://psycrit.com/.
8.
BesnerD.O'MalleyS.Additivity of factor effects in reading task is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,200935, 312–316.
9.
BesnerD.SmithM.C.Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,199218, 468–482.
10.
BesnerD.WartakS.RobidouxS.Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,200834, 242–250.
11.
BodnerG.E.MassonM.E. J.Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis of priming.Journal of Memory and Language,199737, 268–293.
12.
BodnerG.E.MassonM.E. J.Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming.Journal of Memory and Language,200145, 616–647.
13.
BodnerG.E.MassonM.E. J.Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,200310, 645–652.
14.
BodnerG.E.MassonM.E. J.Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task.Memory and Cognition,200432, 1–11.
15.
BodnerG.E.MassonM.E. J.RichardN.T.Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions.Memory and Cognition,200634, 1298–1311.
16.
BorowskyR.BesnerD.Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,199319, 813–840.
17.
BorowskyR.BesnerD.Parallel distributed processing and lexical–semantic effects in visual word recognition: Are a few stages necessary?.Psychological Review,2006113, 181–194.
18.
CattelJ.M.Mental test and measurements.Mind,189015, 373–381.
19.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ.DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,2001108, 204–256.
20.
FaustM.E.BalotaD.A.SpielerD.H.FerraroF.R.Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implication for group differences in response latency.Psychological Bulletin,1999125, 777–799.
21.
FergusonR.RobidouxS.BesnerD.Reading aloud: Evidence for contextual control over lexical activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,200935, 499–507.
22.
HutchisonK.A.BalotaD.A.CorteseM.J.WatsonM.J.Predicting priming at the item level.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,200861, 1036–1066.
23.
JonidesJ.MackR.On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit.Psychological Bulletin,198496, 29–44.
24.
KieferM.MartensU.Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2010139, 464–489.
25.
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic space from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.
26.
MassonM.E. J.BodnerG.E.A retrospective view of masked priming: Toward a unified account of masked and long-term repetition priming.Masked priming: The state of the art,KinoshitaS.LupkerS.Psychology PressNew York, NY200357–94.
27.
Masson, M. E. J., & Kliegl, R. (in press). Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1037/a0029180.
28.
McClellandJ.L.On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.Psychological Review,197986, 287–330.
29.
McClellandJ.L.RumelhartD.E.An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,198188, 375–407.
30.
MeyerD.E.SchvaneveldtR.W.RuddyM.G.Loci of contextual effect on visual word recognition.Attention and Performance V,RabbittP.M. A.DornicS.Academic PressNew York, NY197598–118.
31.
NeelyJ.H.Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1977106, 226–254.
32.
NeelyJ.H.O'ConnorP.A.CalabreseG.Fast trial pacing in a lexical decision task reveals a decay of automatic semantic activation.Acta Psychologica,2010133, 127–136.
33.
NelsonD.L.McEvoyC.L.SchreiberT.A.The University of Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms,1998 Available from http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
34.
O'MalleyS.BesnerD.Reading aloud: Qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,200834, 1400–1411.
35.
O'MalleyS.ReynoldsM.G.BesnerD.Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: Extension to Yap and Balota (2007).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,200733, 451–458.
36.
PeressottiF.JobR.RumiatiR.NicolettiR.Levels of representation in word processing.Visual Cognition,19952, 421–450.
37.
PerryC.ZieglerJ.C.ZorziM.Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud.Psychological Review,2007114, 273–315.
38.
PlautD.C.BoothJ.R.Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing.Psychological Review,2000107, 786–823.
39.
PlautD.C.BoothJ.R.More modeling but still no stages: Reply to Borowsky and Besner.Psychological Review,2006113, 196–200.
40.
PlourdeC.E.BesnerD.On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,199751, 181–194.
41.
PohlC.KieselA.KundeW.Early and late selection in unconscious information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,201036, 268–285.
42.
ReynoldsM.BesnerD.Neighborhood density, word frequency, and spelling to sound regularity effects in naming: Similarities and differences between skilled readers and the dual route cascaded computational model.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,200458, 13–31.
43.
RobertsS.SternbergS.The meaning of additive reaction-time affects: Tests of three alternatives.Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience,MeyerD.E.KornblumS.MIT PressCambridge, MA1993611–653.
44.
RobidouxS.StolzJ.A.BesnerD.Visual word recognition: Evidence for global and local control over semantic feedback.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,201036, 689–703.
StannersR.F.JastrzembskiJ.E.WestbrookA.Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,197514, 259–264.
47.
StanovichK.E.Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly,198016, 32–71.
48.
StanovichK.E.WestR.F.Mechanism of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention.Memory & Cognition,19797, 77–85.
49.
StanovichK.E.WestR.F.The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Test of a two-process theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,19817, 658–672.
50.
StanovichK.E.WestR.F.On priming by a sentence contest.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1983112, 1–36.
51.
SternbergS.The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method.Acta Psychologica,196930, 276–315.
52.
StolzJ.A.NeelyJ.H.When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,199521, 596–611.
53.
ThomasM.A.NeelyJ.H.O'ConnorP.When word identification gets tough, retrospective semantic processing comes to rescue.Journal of Memory and Language,201266, 623–643.
54.
VachonF.JolicœurP.Impaired semantic processing during task-set switching: Evidence from the N400 in rapid serial visual presentation.Psychophysiology,201148, 102–111.
55.
Van SelstM.JolicœurP.A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,199447A, 631–650.
56.
WhittleseaB.W.JacobyL.L.Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon?.Journal of Memory and Language,199029, 546–565.
57.
YapM.J.BalotaD.A.Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,200733, 274–296.
58.
YapM.J.BalotaD.A.TseC.S.BesnerD.On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,200834, 495–513.
59.
YapM.J.TseC.S.BalotaD.A.Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity.Journal of Memory and Language,200961, 303–325.
60.
ZieglerJ.C.PerryC.ZorziM.Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: No challenge for CDP+: Comment on O'Malley and Besner (2008).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,200935, 306–316.
