Evidence for the role of cognitive resources in flavour

Abstract

One way that dis/likes are formed is through evaluative conditioning (EC). In two experiments we investigated the role of cognitive resources in flavour–flavour conditioning. Both experiments employed an EC procedure in which three novel flavoured conditioned stimuli (CSs) were consumed. One was consumed with a pleasant unconditioned stimulus (US; CS+ sugar), one with an aversive US (CS+ saline), and a third with plain water (CS–). Half of participants in each experiment performed a cognitive load task during conditioning. We measured EC using self-reported measures of liking (Experiments 1 and 2) and an indirect measure of liking: drink pick-up latency (Experiment 2). In both experiments, differential EC was observed in the no cognitive load condition but not in the cognitive load condition. This pattern of results was observed in self-reported measures of liking as well as in the drink pick-up latency data. Results from both experiments show that EC occurs only when there are sufficient cognitive resources available. The fact that this was observed using both self-reported and indirect measures suggests that insufficient cognitive resources affect learning itself rather than merely obstructing reporting.

Keywords

Cognitive resources Evaluative conditioning Flavour-flavour learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baeyens

Eelen

Van den Bergh

Crombez

(1990). Flavor–flavor and color–flavor conditioning in humans. Learning and Motivation, 21, 434–455.

Brunstrom, J. M., Downes, C. R., & Higgs, S. (2001). Effect of dietary restraint on flavour-flavour learning. Appetite, 37, 197–206.

Brunstrom

J.M.

Fletcher

H.Z.

(2008). Flavour–flavour learning occurs automatically and only in hungry participants. Physiology & Behavior, 93, 1–2 13–19.

Brunstrom

J.M.

Higgs

(2002). Exploring evaluative conditioning using a working memory task. Learning and Motivation, 33, 433–455.

Brunstrom, J. M. Higgs, S. and Mitchell, G. L. (2005). Dietary restraint and US devaluation predict evaluative learning. Physiology & Behavior, 85, 524–535.

Crook

C.K.

(1978). Taste perception in the newborn infant. Infant Behavior and Development, 1, 52–69 doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(78)80009-5.

Davies

S.R.

El-Deredy

Zandstra

E.H.

Blanchette

(March, 2012). Developing a novel indirect measure of food liking based on approach-avoidance motivations, Paper presented at the British Feeding and Drinking Group, Brighton,.

De Houwer

(2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241.

De Houwer

Baeyens

Field

(2005). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: Some current controversies and possible ways forward. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 161–174.

10.

Dickinson

Brown

K.J.

(2007). Flavor-evaluative conditioning is unaffected by contingency knowledge during training with color–flavor compounds. Learning & Behavior, 35, 36–42.

11.

Dijksterhuis

(2004). I like myself but I don't know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345–355.

12.

Field

Lascelles

K.R. R.

Lester

K.J.

Askew

Davey

G.C. L.

(2008). Evaluative conditioning: Missing, presumed dead. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 64, 46–64.

13.

Field

Moore

(2005). Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 217–243.

14.

Fulcher

E.P.

Hammerl

(2001). When all is revealed: A dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 524–549.

15.

Hofmann

De Houwer

Perugini

Baeyens

Crombez

(2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 3 390–421.

16.

Krieglmeyer

Deutsch

De Houwer

De Raedt

(2010). Being moved: Valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions. Psychological Science, 21, 607–613.

17.

Lovibond

P.F.

Shanks

D.R.

(2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3.

18.

Moors

De Houwer

(2006). Problems with dividing the realm of processes. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 199–204.

19.

Pleyers

Corneille

Luminet

Yzerbyt

(2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1 130–144.

20.

Pleyers

Corneille

Yzerbyt

Luminet

(2009). Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 279–285.

21.

Rozin

Vollmecke

T.A.

(1986). Food likes and dislikes. Annual Review of Nutrition, 6, 433–456.

22.

Schneider

Eschman

Zuccolotto

(2002). E-Prime user's guide, Pittsburgh, PA Psychology Software Tools.

23.

Van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E. R., Bergers, G. P. A., & Defares, P. B. (1986). The Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behaviour. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 747–755.

24.

Walther

(2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919–934.

Evidence for the role of cognitive resources in flavour–flavour evaluative conditioning

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References