We report a boundary paradigm eye movement experiment to investigate whether the linguistic category of a two-character Chinese string affects how the second character of that string is processed in the parafovea during reading. We obtained clear preview effects in all conditions but, more importantly, found parafoveal-on-foveal effects whereby a nonsense preview of the second character influenced fixations on the first character. This effect occurred for monomorphemic words, but not for compound words or phrases. Also, in a word boundary demarcation experiment, we demonstrate that Chinese readers are not always consistent in their judgements of which characters in a sentence constitute words. We conclude that information regarding the combinatorial properties of characters in Chinese is used online to moderate the extent to which parafoveal characters are processed.
BalotaD.A.RaynerK. (1991). Word recognition processes in foveal and parafoveal vision: The range of influence of lexical variables.BesnerD.HumphreysG.W.Basic processes in readingHillsdale, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
CaiQ.BrysbaertM. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles.PLoS ONE, 5, 6e10729.
3.
Chinese Daily Word Frequency Dictionary. (1998). Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University.
4.
CuiL.YanG.BaiX.HyönäJ.WangS.LiversedgeP.S. (in press). Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: An eye-movement-contingent display change study.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.667423.
5.
DriegheD. (2011). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading.LiversedgeS.P.GilchristI.D.EverlingS.The Oxford handbook on eye movementsOxford, UKOxford University Press839–855.
6.
DriegheD.PollatsekA.JuhaszB.J.RaynerK. (2010). Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary.Cognition, 116, 136–142.
7.
EngbertR.NuthmannA.RichterE.D.KlieglR. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.
8.
HoosainR. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese.ChenH.-C.TzengO.J.L.Language processing in ChineseAmsterdam, The NetherlandsNorth-Holland111–130.
9.
HyönäJ.BertramR.PollatsekA. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.Memory & Cognition, 32, 523–532.
10.
JuhaszB.J.PollatsekA.HyönäJ.DriegheD.RaynerK. (2009). Parafoveal processing within and between words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1356–1376.
11.
KennedyA. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 429–455.
12.
LiX.S.RaynerK.CaveK. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading.Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525–552.
13.
Modern Chinese Word Dictionary. (2005). Beijing, China: Business Press.
14.
Modern Chinese Word Frequency Dictionary. (1990). Beijing, China: Yuhang Press.
15.
MurrayW.S. (1998). Parafoveal pragmatics.UnderwoodG.Eye guidance in reading and scene perceptionOxford, UKElsevier181–200.
16.
RaynerK. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues during reading.Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.
17.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
18.
RaynerK.WellA.D.PollatsekA.BerteraJ.H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537–550.
19.
ReichleE.D.PollatsekA.FisherD.L.RaynerK. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.
20.
ReichleE.D.RaynerK.PollatsekA. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparison to other models.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476.
WangS.TongX.YangJ.LengY. (2009). Semantic codes are obtained before word fixation in Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from eye-movements.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 220–232.
23.
YanM.RichterE.D.ShuH.KlieglR. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561–566.
24.
YangJ.WangS.XuY.RaynerK. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from character n+2? Evidence from eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1192–1204.
25.
Yen, M.-H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O.J.I., Daisy, L.H., & Tsai, J.-L. (2009). Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences. Acta Psychologica, 131, 24–33.
