Cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience have recently developed a keen interest in the phenomenon of mind-wandering. People mind-wander frequently, and mind-wandering is associated with decreased cognitive performance. But why do people mind-wander so much? Previous investigations have focused on cognitive abilities like working memory capacity and attention control. But an individual's tendency to worry, feel anxious, and entertain personal concerns also influences mind-wandering. The Control Failure × Concerns model of mind-wandering. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–197] argues that individual differences in the propensity to mind-wander are jointly determined by cognitive abilities and by the presence of personally salient concerns that intrude on task focus. In order to test this model, we investigated individual differences in mind-wandering, executive attention, and personality with a focus on neuroticism. The results showed that neurotic individuals tended to report more mind-wandering during cognitive tasks, lower working memory capacity, and poorer attention control. Thus the trait of neuroticism adds an additional source of variance in the tendency to mind-wander, which offers support for the Control Failure × Concerns model. The results help bridge the fields of clinical psychology, cognitive psychology, affective neuroscience, and cognitive neuroscience as a means of developing a more complete understanding of the complex relationship between cognition, personality, and emotion.
AntrobusJ. S., SingerJ. L., & GreenbergS. (1966). Studies in the stream of consciousness: Experimental enhancement and suppression of spontaneous cognitive processes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 399–417.
2.
BaerR. A., SmithG. T., HopkinsJ., KrietemeyerJ., & ToneyL. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 37–45.
3.
BairdB., SmallwoodJ., & SchoolerJ. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1604–1611.
4.
BanksJ. B., TartarJ. L., & TamayoB. A. (2015). Examining factors involved in stress-related working memory impairments: Independent or conditional effects?Emotion, 15, 827–836.
5.
ChristoffK., GordonA. M., SmallwoodJ., SmithR., & SchoolerJ. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind-wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8719–8724.
6.
CostaP. T., & McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEOFFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
7.
DingesD. F., & PowellJ. W. (1985). Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 17, 652–655.
8.
EysenckM. W., DerakshanN., SantosR., & CalvoM. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory.. Emotion, 7, 336–353.
9.
ForsterS., Nunez ElizaldeA. O., CastleE., & BishopS. J. (2015). Unraveling the anxious mind: Anxiety, worry, and frontal engagement in sustained attention versus off-task processing. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 609–618.
10.
HahnS., ButtaccioD. R., HahnJ., & LeeT. (2015). Personality and attention: Levels of neuroticism and extraversion can predict attentional performance during a change detection task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1041–1048.
11.
HamiltonJ. P., FurmanD. J., ChangC., ThomasonM. E., DennisE., & GotlibI. H. (2011). Default-mode and task-positive network activity in major depressive disorder: Implications for adaptive and maladaptive rumination. Biological Psychiatry, 70, 327–333.
12.
HeadJ., & HeltonW. S. (2014). Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony. Acta Psychologica, 153, 87–94.
13.
JacksonJ. D., WeinsteinY., & BalotaD. A. (2013). Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–16.
14.
JohnO. P., NaumannL. P., & SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
KaneM. J.,BleckleyK. M.,ConwayA. R. A., & EngleR. W. (2001). A controlled attention view of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130,169–183.
16.
KaneM. J., BrownL. H., McVayJ. C., SilviaP. J., Myin-GermeysI., & KwapilT. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614–621.
17.
KaneM. J. & McVayJ. C. (2012). What mind-wandering reveals about executive-control abilities and failures. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 348–354.
18.
KillingsworthM. A., & GilbertD. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932–932.
19.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
KlingerE. (1999). Thought flow: Properties and mechanisms underlying shifts in content. In SingerJ. A. & SaloveyP. (Eds.), At play in the fields of consciousness: Essays in honor of Jerome L. Singer (pp. 29–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
21.
KlingerE. (2009). Daydreaming and fantasized: Thought flow and motivation. In MarkmanK. D., KleinW. M. P., & SuhrJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 225–239). New York: Psychology Press.
22.
MasonM. F.BrownK., MarR. A., & SmallwoodJ. (2013). Driver of discontent or escape vehicle: The affective consequences of mind-wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12.
23.
McVayJ. C., & KaneM. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–197.
24.
McVayJ. C., & KaneM. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 141, 302–320.
25.
McVayJ. C., & KaneM. J. (2013). Dispatching the wandering mind? Toward a laboratory method for cuing “spontaneous” off-task thought. Frontier in Psychology, 4, 1–16.
26.
McVayJ. C., KaneM. J., & KwapilT. R. (2009). Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 857–863.
27.
MoutafiJ., FurnhamA., & TsaousisI. (2006). Is the relationship between intelligence and trait Neuroticism mediated by test anxiety?Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 587–597.
28.
PerkinsA. M., ArnoneD., SmallwoodJ., & MobbsD. (2015). Thinking too much: Self-generated thought as the engine of neuroticism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 492–498.
29.
PerkinsA. M., ArnoneD., SmallwoodJ., & MobbsD. (2016). Response to Pickering et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 2–3
30.
PickeringA. D., SmillieL. D., & DeYoungC. G. (2016). Neurotic individuals are not creative thinkers. Trends in Cognitive Science20, 2–2
31.
PoerioG. L., TotterdellP., & MilesE. (2013). Mind-wandering and negative mood: Does one thing really lead to another?Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1412–1421.
32.
RammstedtB., & JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.
33.
RiskoE. F., AndersonA., SarwalA., EngelhardtM., & KingstoneA. (2012). Everyday attention: Variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 234–242.
34.
RiskoE. F., BuchananD., MedimorecS., & KingstoneA. (2013). Everyday attention: Mind-wandering and computer use during lectures. Computers & Education, 68, 275–283.
35.
RobinsonM. D., & TamirM. (2005). Neuroticism as mental noise: A relation between neuroticism and reaction time standard deviations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 107–114.
36.
RobisonM. K., & UnsworthN. (2015). Working memory capacity offers resistance to mind-wandering and external distraction in a context-specific manner. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 680–690.
37.
SaklofskeD. H., KellyI. W., & LanzenB. L. (1995). Neuroticism, depression, and depression proneness. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 27–31.
38.
SingerJ. L., & AntrobusJ. S. (1963). A factor-analytic study of daydreaming and conceptually-related cognitive and personality variables. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 187–209.
39.
SmallwoodJ., FitzgeraldA., MilesL. K., & PhillipsL. H. (2009). Shifting moods, wandering minds: Negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion, 9, 271–276.
40.
SmallwoodJ., NindL., & O'ConnorR. C. (2009). When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 118–125.
41.
SmallwoodJ., & SchoolerJ. W. (2015). The science of the mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518.
42.
UnsworthN. & McMillanB. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 832–842.
43.
UnsworthN., & McMillanB. D. (2014). Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: A latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities. Acta Psychologica, 150, 14–25.
44.
UnsworthN., McMillanB. D., BrewerG. A., & SpillersG. J. (2012). Everyday attention failures: An individual differences investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1765–1772.
45.
UnsworthN., MillerJ. D., LakeyC. E., YoungD. L., MeeksJ. T., CampbellW. K., … GoodieA. S. (2009). Exploring the relation among executive functions, fluid intelligence, and personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 194–200.
46.
WattsF. N.,McKennaF. P,SharrockR., &TreziseL. (1986). Colour naming of phobia-related words. British Journal of Psychology,77, 97–108.
