Reading requires integration of language and cognitive processes with attention and eye movement control. Individuals differ in their reading ability, but little is known about the neurocognitive processes associated with these individual differences. To investigate this issue, we combined eyetracking and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), simultaneously recording eye movements and blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activity while subjects read text passages. We found that the variability and skew of fixation duration distributions across individuals, as assessed by ex-Gaussian analyses, decreased with increasing neural activity in regions associated with the cortical eye movement control network (left frontal eye fields [FEF], left intraparietal sulcus [IPS], left inferior frontal gyrus [IFG] and right IFG). The results suggest that individual differences in fixation duration during reading are related to underlying neurocognitive processes associated with the eye movement control system and its relationship to language processing. The results also show that eye movements and fMRI can be combined to investigate the neural correlates of individual differences in natural reading.
AronA. R.FletcherP. C.BullmoreE. T.SahakianB. J.RobbinsT. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 115–116. doi:10.1038/nn1003
2.
AronA. R.RobbinsT. W.PoldrackR. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010
3.
BalotaD. A.YapM. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 160–166. doi:10.1177/0963721411408885
4.
BednyM.McGillM.Thompson-SchillS. L. (2008). Semantic adaptation and competition during word comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2574–2585. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn018
5.
BrownM. R. G.GoltzH. C.VilisT.FordK. A.EverlingS. (2006). Inhibition and generation of saccades: Rapid event-related fMRI of prosaccades, antisaccades, and nogo trials. NeuroImage, 33, 644–659. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.002
6.
BrownM. R. G.VilisT.EverlingS. (2008). Isolation of saccade inhibition processes: Rapid event-related fMRI of saccades and nogo trials. NeuroImage, 39, 793–804. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.035
7.
ButlerK. M.ZacksR. T.HendersonJ. M. (1999). Suppression of reflexive saccades in younger and older adults: Age comparisons on an antisaccade task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 584–591.
8.
ButterworthB.KovasY. (2013). Understanding neurocognitive developmental disorders can improve education for all. Science, 340(6130), 300–305. doi:10.1126/science.1231022
9.
CliftonC. E.FerreiraF.HendersonJ. M.InhoffA. W.LiversedgeS.ReichleE. D.SchotterE. R. (2016). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 1–19.
10.
CoxR. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29, 162–173.
11.
CoxR. W.JesmanowiczA. (1999). Real-time 3D image registration of functional MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 42, 1014–1018.
12.
DesaiR. H.ChoiW.LaiV.HendersonJ. M. (2016). Towards semantics in the wild: Activation to manipulable nouns in naturalistic reading. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 4050–4055.
13.
DykiertD.DerG.StarrJ. M.DearyI. J. (2012). Age differences in intra-individual variability in simple and choice reaction time: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e45759.
14.
EngbertR.NuthmannA.RichterE. M.KlieglR. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.
15.
FedorenkoE.KanwisherN. (2011). Some regions within Broca’s area do respond more strongly to sentences than to linguistically degraded stimuli: A comment on Rogalsky and Hickok (2011). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2632–2635.
16.
FiebachC. J.FriedericiA. D.MüllerK.von CramonD. Y. (2002). fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 11–23. doi:10.1162/089892902317205285
17.
FoxP. T.LancasterJ. L. (1994). Neuroscience on the net. Science, 266(5187), 994–996.
18.
FriedericiA. D.KotzS. A. (2003). The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. NeuroImage, 20, 8–17.
19.
GabrieliJ. D. E. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325(5938), 280–283. doi:10.1126/science.1171999
20.
GrosbrasM.-H.LairdA. R.PausT. (2005). Cortical regions involved in eye movements, shifts of attention, and gaze perception. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 140–154. doi:10.1002/hbm.20145
21.
GuittonD.BuchtelH. A.DouglasR. M. (1985). Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades. Experimental Brain Research/Experimentelle Hirnforschung, 58, 455–472.
22.
HagoortP.IndefreyP. (2014). The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37, 347–362.
23.
HampshireA.ChamberlainS. R.MontiM. M.DuncanJ.OwenA. M. (2010). The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: Inhibition and attentional control. NeuroImage, 50, 1313–1319. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109
24.
HeathcoteA.BrownS.CousineauD. (2004). QMPE: Estimating lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 277–290.
25.
HendersonJ. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498–504. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006
26.
HendersonJ. M. (2013). Eye movements. In ReisbergD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 69–82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
HendersonJ. M.ChoiW (2015). Neural correlates of fixation duration during real-world scene viewing: Evidence from fixation-related (FIRE) fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(6), 1137–1145.
28.
HendersonJ. M.ChoiW.LowderM. W.FerreiraF. (2016). Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading. NeuroImage, 132, 293–300.
29.
HendersonJ. M.ChoiW.LukeS. G. (2014). Morphology of primary visual cortex predicts individual differences in fixation duration during text reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(12), 2880–2888.
30.
HendersonJ. M.ChoiW.LukeS. G.DesaiR. H. (2015). Neural correlates of fixation duration in natural reading: Evidence from fixation-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 119, 390–397. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.072
31.
HendersonJ. M.LukeS. G. (2014). Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudo-reading, scene viewing, and scene search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1390–1400.
32.
HirshornE. A.Thompson-SchillS. L. (2006). Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in covert word retrieval: Neural correlates of switching during verbal fluency. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2547–2557. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.035
33.
JacksonJ. D.BalotaD. A.DuchekJ. M.HeadD. (2012). White matter integrity and reaction time intraindividual variability in healthy aging and early-stage Alzheimer disease. Neuropsychologia, 50, 357–366. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.024
34.
KaanE.SwaabT. Y. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 350–356.
35.
KaneM. J.BleckleyM. K.ConwayA. R.EngleR. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 130, 169–183.
36.
KupermanV.Van DykeJ. A. (2011). Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 42–73. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.002
37.
LeungH. C.CaiW. (2007). Common and differential ventrolateral prefrontal activity during inhibition of hand and eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9893–9900.
38.
LukeS. G.HendersonJ. M. (2013). Oculomotor and cognitive control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from mindless reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1230–1242.
39.
MacDonaldS. W. S.NybergL.BäckmanL. (2006). Intra-individual variability in behavior: Links to brain structure, neurotransmission and neuronal activity. Trends in Neurosciences, 29, 474–480. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.06.011
40.
MacDonaldS. W. S.NybergL.SandblomJ.FischerH.BäckmanL. (2008). Increased response-time variability is associated with reduced inferior parietal activation during episodic recognition in aging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 779–786. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20502
41.
MatsudaT.MatsuuraM.OhkuboT.OhkuboH.MatsushimaE.InoueK.. . . KojimaT. (2004). Functional MRI mapping of brain activation during visually guided saccades and antisaccades: Cortical and subcortical networks. Psychiatry Research, 131, 147–155.
42.
MillerB.O’DonnellC. (2013). Opening a window into reading development: Eye movements’ role within a broader literacy research framework. School Psychology Review, 42, 123–139.
43.
MunozD. P.EverlingS. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 218–228. doi:10.1038/nrn1345
44.
MüriR. M.NyffelerT. (2008). Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of reflexive and volitional saccades as revealed by lesion studies with neurological patients and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Brain and Cognition, 68, 284–292. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.018
45.
NielsonF. A.HansenL. K. (2002). Automatic anatomical labeling of Talairach coordinates and generation of volumes of interest via the BrainMap database. NeuroImage, 16, 1–2.
46.
NiggJ. T.ButlerK. M.Huang-PollockC. L.HendersonJ. M. (2002). Inhibitory processes in adults with persistent childhood onset ADHD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 153–157
47.
NuthmannA.HendersonJ. M. (2012). Using CRISP to model global characteristics of fixation durations in scene viewing and reading with a common mechanism. Visual Cognition, 20, 457–494. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.670142
48.
NuthmannA.SmithT. J.EngbertR.HendersonJ. M. (2010). CRISP: A computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychological Review, 117, 382–405. doi:10.1037/a0018924
49.
PetitL.ZagoL.VigneauM.AnderssonF.CrivelloF.MazoyerB.. . . Tzourio-MazoyerN. (2009). Functional asymmetries revealed in visually guided saccades: An FMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 2994–3003. doi:10.1152/jn.00280.2009
50.
Pierrot-DeseillignyC.MileaD.MüriR. M. (2004). Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Current Opinion in Neurology, 17, 17–25.
51.
PollatsekA.ReichleE. D.RaynerK. (2006). Tests of the E-Z reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1–56. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.001
52.
PtakR.MüriR. M. (2013). The parietal cortex and saccade planning: Lessons from human lesion studies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 254. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00254
53.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
54.
RaynerK. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
55.
RaynerK.LiX.WilliamsC. C.CaveK. R.WellA. D. (2007). Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Research, 47, 2714–2726. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007
56.
ReichleE. D.PollatsekA.FisherD. L.RaynerK. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.
57.
ReingoldE. M.ReichleE. D.GlaholtM. G.SheridanH. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177–206. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001
58.
RichlanF.KronbichlerM.WimmerH. (2011). Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions in dyslexic children and adults. NeuroImage, 56, 1735–1742. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.040
59.
SaadZ. S.GlenD. R.ChenG.BeauchampM. S.DesaiR.CoxR. W. (2009). A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation. NeuroImage, 44, 839–848.
60.
SchmiedekF.OberauerK.WilhelmO.SüßH.-M.WittmannW. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 136, 414–429.
61.
SimmondsD. J.FotedarS. G.SuskauerS. J.PekarJ. J.DencklaM. B.MostofskyS. H. (2007). Functional brain correlates of response time variability in children. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2147–2157.
62.
SnijdersT. M.VosseT.KempenG.Van BerkumJ. J. A.PeterssonK. M.HagoortP. (2009). Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study using word-category ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1493–1503. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn187
63.
StaubA.BenatarA. (2013). Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1304–1311.
64.
StaubA.WhiteS. J.DriegheD.HollwayE. C.RaynerK. (2010). Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1280–1293. doi:10.1037/a0016896
65.
TalairachJ.TournouxP. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3-D proportional system: An approach to cerebral imaging. Stuttgart, Germany: Theime.
66.
TopsM.BoksemM. A. S. (2011). A potential role of the inferior frontal gyrus and anterior insula in cognitive control, brain rhythms, and event-related potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 330–330. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00330
67.
TseC.-S.BalotaD. A.YapM. J.DuchekJ. M.McCabeD. P. (2010). Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology, 24, 300–315. doi:10.1037/a0018274
68.
Van EssenD. C. (2005). A population-average, landmark- and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. NeuroImage, 28, 635–662. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058
69.
VeldreA.AndrewsS. (2014). Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 703–727. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.826258
70.
VerbruggenF.LoganG. D. (2008). Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 418–424. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005
71.
VolleE.KinkingnehunS.PochonJ. B.MondonK.Thiebaut de SchottenM.SeassauM.. . . LevyR. (2008). The functional architecture of the left posterior and lateral prefrontal cortex in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2460–2469. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn010
72.
WhiteS. J.StaubA. (2012). The distribution of fixation durations during reading: Effects of stimulus quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 603–617.
73.
YangS. N.McConkieG. W. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times. Vision Research, 41, 3567–3585.
74.
YarkoniT.BarchD. M.GrayJ. R.ConturoT. E.BraverT. S. (2009). BOLD correlates of trial-by-trial reaction time variability in gray and white matter: A multi-study fMRI analysis. PLoS ONE, 4(1), e4257.
