Surfable Surveys: Using Web-Based Technology to Reach Newsroom Respondents

Abstract

This study deconstructs some of the challenges and successes in using Web-based tools to survey three groups of broadcast news personnel: news directors, producers, and show directors. In conducting two recent newsroom-based research projects, we found that Web-based survey methods offer many conveniences, including ease of design, the elimination of the data-entry phase of the project, and flexibility in question type, question order, and skip patterns.

Although broadcast news personnel use a great deal of technology in their day-to-day work and are comfortable with Web interface, the use of this method in survey research didn't result in higher response rates. Significant follow-up communication to nonrespondents was still necessary. Another primary difficulty in the use of Web-based survey methods in newsrooms was the inability to easily access e-mail and contact information for potential respondents. The unspoken obstacle in newsroom survey research is the reluctance of industry professionals to dedicate time to research initiatives and the academic approach dictating certain protocols. On the basis of our experiences in fielding these two projects, several logistical suggestions for the creation and deployment of Web surveys are offered.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

T. L.

(2003). Networked news: An examination of communication between technical and editorial staff in television news. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Andrews

Nonnecke

Preece

Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard to involve Internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 185–210. (2003).

Andrews

Preece

Turoff

(2001, January). A conceptual framework for demographic groups resistant to online community interaction. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI.

Archer

T. M.

Web-based surveys. Journal of Extension, 41. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from http://www.joe.org/joe/2003august/tt6.shtml (2003).

Chan-Olmsted

S. M.

L. S.

Internet business models for broadcasters: How television stations perceive and integrate the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 597–617. (2003).

Church

A. H.

Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 62–79. (1993).

Cleary

J. L.

(2004). Newsroom diversity, professional development, and staff retention: An integrated approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Couper

M. P.

Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 464–494. (2000).

Couper

M. P.

Blair

Triplett

(1997, May). A comparison of mail and e-mail for a survey of employees in federal statistical agencies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Norfolk, VA.

10.

Crawford

S. D.

Couper

M. P.

Lamias

M. J.

Web surveys: Perceptions of burden. Social Science Review, 19, 146–162. (2001).

11.

Dennis

Chatt

Motta-Stanko

Pulliam

(2005, May). Data collection mode effects controlling for sample origins in a panel survey: Telephone and Internet. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, FL.

12.

Dillman

D. A.

(2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

13.

E-mail marketing: A weekly perspective. (2004, January 6). eMarketer. Retrieved January 9, 2004, from http://www.emarketer.com/news/article.php?1002612

14.

Emery

(1995). How to grow your business on the Internet. New York: Coriolis Group.

15.

Frick

Bachtinger

M. T.

Reips

U.-D.

(1999). Financial incentives, personal information, and drop-out rates in online studies. In Reips

U.-D.

, Current Internet science: Trends, techniques, results. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from http://www.gor.de/gor99/tband99/pds/a_h/frick.pdf

16.

Flicker

R. D.

Schonlau

Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14, 347–367. (2002).

17.

Just

Levine

Regan

Gambling with the future: Local newsrooms beset by sponsor interference, budget cuts, layoffs, and added programming. Columbia Journalism Review, 60, 2–3. (2001).

18.

Kittleson

M. J.

An assessment of the response rate via the postal service and e-mail. Health Values, 18, 27–29. (1995).

19.

Mehta

Sivadas

Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37, 429–439. (1995).

20.

Meyer

(2002). Precision journalism (4th ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

21.

Perkins

G. H.

“Will libraries' Web-based survey methods replace existing nonelectronic survey methods?

Information Technology and Libraries, 23, 123. (2004).

22.

Sackmary

(1998). Internet survey research: Practices, problems, and prospects. Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Summer Conference, 41–49.

23.

Schaefer

D. R.

Dillman

D. A.

Development of a standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 378–397. (1998).

24.

Smith

C. B.

Casting the net: surveying an Internet population. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. (1997, June).

25.

Tuggle

C. A.

Huffman

Live news reporting: Professional judgment or technological pressure? A national survey of television news directors and senior reporters. Journal of Broadcast & Electronic Media, 43, 492–505. (1999).

26.

Watt

J. H.

(1999). Internet systems for evaluation research. In Gay

& Bennington

T. L.

, Information technologies in evaluation: Social, moral epistemological and practical implications (pp. 23–44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

27.

Cooper

A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 36–44. (1983).

28.

Yun

G. W.

Trumbo

C. W.

Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail and Web form. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. (2000, September).

29.

Zoch

L. M.

Duhe

S. F.

“Feeding the media” during a crisis: A nationwide look. Public Relations Quarterly, 42, 15–19. (1997).