KavenyM. Cathleen“Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia, and the Law.”Theological Studies (Mardi, 1997), 58(1): 124–148.
2.
GulaRichard, What are They Saying about Euthanasia? (NY: Paulist Press, 1986), 1.
3.
Kenneth OverbergS.J., Mercy or Murder? (Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1993), 3.
4.
Declaration on Euthanasia, 140-150 reprinted in Overberg, 143.
5.
BrockDean, “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Sometimes Morally Justified,” in Robert Weir (ed.), Physician-Assisted Suicide (Indiana University Press, 1997), 86103; John Ladd, “Positive and Negative Euthanasia,” in Michael Bayles and Dallas High, Medical Treatment of the Dying: Moral Issues (Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co., 1983), 105-127; Daniel Maguire, Death by Choice (Garden City, 1984); James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” New England Journal of Medicine, (1975). 292: 78-80; also his The End of Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 106-150.
6.
CBS's60 Minutes airing of Kevorkian killing his patient by lethal injection, Nov. 22, 1998.
7.
“A Fail-Safe Model for Justifiable Medically Assisted Suicide,”263–295, in Michael Uhlmann (ed.), Last Rights? (Gr. Rapids: William Eerdmans Publishing Col., 1998), 263.
8.
ParisJohn, “Overview: Active Euthanasia,”3–20 in Overberg, 8.
9.
Article reprinted in Uhlmann, 317–318.
10.
“Death and Dignity: The Case of Diane,” (1991) 324: 691–694.
11.
Correspondence: “Death and Dignity: The Case of Diane,”Ibid. (1991), 325: 658–660.
12.
(New York: Norton, 1993) excerpted in Uhlmann as “Death and Dignity A: The Case of Diane,” 319-342, p. 328.
TauerCarol, “Philosophical Debate and Public Policy on Physician-Assisted Suicide” in Ronald Hamel & Edwin Dubose, 9eds.)Must We Suffer Our Way to Death? (Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1996), 47.
15.
Life at Risk, A Chronicle of Euthanasia Trends in America, (NCCB Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, January, 1999) 9: 1.
16.
See in Uhlmann the extensive excerpts of the federal court decisions and the Supreme Court decision, 475-531, 599-633 respectively. For commentary see KavenyM. Cathleen, n. 1 above.
17.
Borst-EilersElse, “Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Brief Historical review and Present Situation,” in MisbinRobert (ed.), Euthanasia: The Good of the Patient, the Good of Society (Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group, Inc., 1992), 5568.
18.
CapronAlexander, “Death and the Court,”Hastings Center Report, (September-October, 1997), 27(5): 25.
19.
“Physician assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.” In Uhlmann, 406.
20.
In Uhlmann, 402.
21.
In Uhlmann, 402.
22.
DworkinRonald, NagelThomas, “Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers’ Brief,”The New York Review of Books, (March 27, 1997), 41–47.
23.
DworkinRonald, NagelThomas, “Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers’ Brief,”The New York Review of Books, (March 27, 1997), 45.
24.
Quote in M.KavenyCathleen, “Assisted Suicide, the Supreme Court, and the Constitutive Function of the Law,”Hastings Center Report, (September-October, 1997), 27(5): 32.
25.
BottumSee J., “Debriefing the Philosophers,”First Things, (June-July, 1997), 74: 26–30.
26.
Kaveny, “Assisted Suicide, the Supreme Court…,”32.
27.
MayWilliam, “Moral and Religious Reservations about Euthanasia,” in Hamel & DuBose, 103–119.
28.
Capron, 28; Kaveny, “Assisted Suicide, the Supreme Court…,” 33.
29.
For this analysis of power, I rely on the eloquent and insightful essays of Leon Kass, especially his “Courting Death: Assisted Suicide, Doctors, and the Law,”Commentary, (December, 1996), 102(6): 17–29; “Why Doctors Must Not Kill,” in Uhlmann, 297-306; see also his, “Death With Dignity and the Sanctity of Life,” Commentary, 199-222.
30.
Kass, “Why Doctors…,”302–303.
31.
I am indebted here to CallahanDaniel, “‘Aid-In-Dying’: The Social Dimensions,” in Overberg, 171–182. His essay was written to counter Proposition 119, the Washington State initiative for physician-assisted suicide.
32.
I am indebted here to CallahanDaniel, “‘Aid-In-Dying’: The Social Dimensions,” in Overberg, 174.
33.
I am indebted here to CallahanDaniel, “‘Aid-In-Dying’: The Social Dimensions,” in Overberg, 175.
34.
GeversJ.K M, “What the Law Allows: Legal Aspects of Euthanasia on Request in the Netherlands,” in Misbin, 69–76.