Contact with nature in educational settings might help cognitive functioning and promote positive social behaviour / El contacto con la naturaleza en los contextos educativos podría mejorar el funcionamiento cognitivo y fomentar el comportamiento social positivo
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2015
Contact with nature in educational settings might help cognitive functioning and promote positive social behaviour / El contacto con la naturaleza en los contextos educativos podría mejorar el funcionamiento cognitivo y fomentar el comportamiento social positivo
This research investigates the positive effects that contact with nature in educational settings has on pre-school children. Several studies have shown that contact with nature promotes many beneficial outcomes. In a study conducted in Italy, we tested the hypotheses that exposure to nature in educational settings promotes psychological restoration, strengthens children’s cognitive and affective resources and increases the quality of children’s social interaction. Children’s performance in structured activities and behaviour in free play were assessed through systematic observation, after time spent in outdoor green versus indoor space, respectively. The participants were 39 children from four different childcare centres in the Rome area. Findings confirm the hypothesized pattern, suggesting that contact with outdoor green spaces positively influences children’s cognitive performance, affective states and social behaviour.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbasM. Y.OthmanM. (2010). Social behavior of preschool children in relation to physical spatial definition. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 935–941. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.213
2.
BairdL. (1969). Big school, small school: A critical examination of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 253–260.
3.
BaroniM. R. (1998). Psicologia ambientale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
5.
BermanM. G.JonidesJ.KaplanS. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
6.
BonichiniS. (2002). Prima infanzia: emozioni e vita sociale [First infancy: Emotions and social life]. Roma: Carocci Editore.
7.
CarrusG.LafortezzaR.ColangeloG.DentamaroI.ScopellitiM.SanesiG. (2013). Relations between naturalness and perceived restorativeness of different urban green spaces. Psyecology, 4, 227–244. doi:10.1174/217119713807749869
8.
CarrusG.PirchioS.PassiatoreY.MastandreaS.ScopellitiM.BartoliG. (2012). Contact with nature and children’s wellbeing in educational settings. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 304–309. doi:10.3844/jssp.2012.304.309
9.
ColeyR. L.SullivanW. C.KuoF. E. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29, 468–494. doi:10.1177/001391659702900402
10.
EvansG. W. (2006). Child development and the physical environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 423–451. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190057
11.
EvansG. W.HyggeS. (2005). Noise and performance in children and adults. In LuxonL.PrasherD. (Eds.), Noise and its effects (pp. 549–566). London: Whurr.
12.
EvansG. W.KielwerW.MartinJ. (1991). The role of the physical environment in the health and well-being of children. In SchroederH. E. (Ed.), New directions in health psychology assessment. Series in applied psychology: Social issues and questions (pp. 127–157). New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
13.
Faber TaylorA. F.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 49–63. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0241
14.
FjeldT. (2000). The effect of interior planting on health and discomfort among workers and school children. HortTechnology, 10, 46–52.
15.
GalardiniA. (2003). Crescere al nido. Gli spazi, i tempi, le attività, le relazioni [Growing at the nursery. Spaces, times, activities, relationships]. Roma: Carocci.
16.
GrahnP.MårtenssonF.LindbladB.NilssonP.EkmanA. (1997). Out in the preschool (Ute på Dagis). Stad and Land, Vol. 145. Hässleholm, Sweden: Norra Skåne Offset.
17.
GumpP. V. (1987). School and classroom environments. Handbook of environmental psychology, 1, 691–732.
18.
HartigT. (2004). Restorative environments. In SpielbergerC. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (pp. 273–279). New York, NY: Academic Press/Elsevier.
19.
HartigT.Van Den BergA. E.HagerhallC. M.TomalakM.BauerN.HansmannR.WaasethG. (2011). Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes. In NilssonK., et al. (Eds.), Forests, trees and human health (pp. 127–168). Berlin: Springer Science.
20.
HattieJ.MarshH. W.NeillJ.RichardsG. (1997). Adventure education and outward bound. Review of Educational Research, 67, 43–87. doi:10.3102/00346543067001043
21.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
KaplanS.BermanM. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43–57. doi:10.1177/1745691609356784
23.
KlatteM.HellbrückJ.SeidelJ.LeistnerP. (2010). Effects of classroom acoustics on performance and well-being in elementary school children: A field study. Environment and Behavior, 42, 659–692. doi:10.1177/0013916509336813
24.
KorpelaK. (2002). Children’s environment. In BechtelR. B.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Environmental psychology (pp. 363–373). New York, NY: Wiley.
25.
LegendreA. (2003). Environmental features influencing toddlers’ bioemotional reactions in day care centers. Enviroment and Behaviour, 35, 523–549. doi:10.1177/0013916503035004005
26.
LewinK.LippittR.WhiteR. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 269–299. doi:10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
27.
MatsuiT.StansfeldS. A.HainesM. M.HeadJ. (2004). Children’s cognition and aircraft noise exposure at home—The West London schools study. Noise Health, 7, 49–58.
28.
MaxwellL. E. (1996). Multiple effects of home and day care crowding. Environment and Behavior, 28, 494–511. doi:10.1177/0013916596284004
29.
MitchellR.PophamF. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study. The Lancet, 372, 1655–1660. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X
30.
MooreR.SchneeklothL. (1989). Children and vegetation [special issue]. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 6, 1–57.
31.
MooreR. C. (1986). Childhood’s domain: Play and place in child development. London: Croom Helm.
32.
ProvostM. A.GaronD.LaBarreR. (1991). L'ajustement social des jeunes enfants d'âge préscolaire en fonction de la cohérence maison-garderie. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 23(2), 183–194.
33.
ShawD. S.EmeryR. E. (1988). Chronic family adversity and school-age children’s adjustment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 200–206. doi:10.1097/00004583-198803000-00012
34.
ShieldB.DockrellJ. E. (2003). The effects of noise on children at school: A review. Building Acoustics, 10, 97–116. doi:10.1260/135101003768965960
35.
Taaffe YoungK.MarslandK. W.ZiglerE. (1997). The regulatory status of center-based infant and toddler child care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67(4), 535–544.
36.
TaylorA. F.WileyA.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behaviour, 30, 3–27. doi:10.1177/0013916598301001
37.
TiceD. M.BaumeisterR. F.ShmueliD.MuravenM. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 379–384. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.007
38.
UlrichR. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In AltmanI.WohlwillJ. F. (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory andresearch. Vol. 6: Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). New York, NY: Plenum.
39.
UlrichR. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421. doi:10.1126/science.6143402
40.
Van Den BergA. E.HartigT.StaatsH. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 79–96. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x
41.
WaldenR. (2004). School environments. In SpielbergerC. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 327–338). New York, NY: Academic Press/Elsevier.
42.
WeinsteinC. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49, 577–610.
43.
WellsN. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32, 775–779. doi:10.1177/00139160021972793
44.
WellsN.EvansG. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35, 311–330. doi:10.1177/0013916503035003001
