Positive (gratitude,eudaimonia) and negative (scarcity,costs) determinants of water conservation behaviour / Determinantes positivos (gratitud,eudaimonia) y negativos (escasez,costos) del ahorro de agua
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2016
Positive (gratitude,eudaimonia) and negative (scarcity,costs) determinants of water conservation behaviour / Determinantes positivos (gratitud,eudaimonia) y negativos (escasez,costos) del ahorro de agua
The aim of this study was to test a self-reported structural model of water conservation, estimating its relationships with measures of gratitude, eudaimonia, costs as environmental conservation requirements and water scarcity/shortage. Responses were analysed from a purposive sample of 107 participants, mainly university students from Hermosillo, Mexico. Univariate statistics were obtained along with the internal consistency of the measures in order to test the model, which adequately fit the data and explained 11% of variance in water conservation. Eudaimonia had a positive and direct effect on this behaviour, with no other direct effects found. Furthermore, eudaimonia was significantly affected by gratitude and water scarcity/shortage. Costs as requirements of environmental conservation were not associated with the rest of the variables. These results suggest that eudaimonia operates as a promoter of water conservation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristóteles. (a.C./2007). Ética Nicomaquea. (E. Sinott, trad.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Colihue Clásica.
2.
BechtelR.Corral-VerdugoV. (2010). Happiness and sustainable behavior. In Corral-VerdugoV.García-CadenaC.Frías-ArmentaM. (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. Current trends in theory, research and applications (pp. 433–450). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
3.
BentlerP. M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equation program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4.
BustosA. M. (2004). Modelo de Conducta Proambiental para la Conservación de Agua potable (Tesis de Doctorado en Psicología, inédita). Distrito Federal, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
5.
Corral-VerdugoV. (2002). A structural model of pro-environmental competency. Environment & Behavior, 34, 531–549. doi:10.1177/00116502034004008
6.
Corral-VerdugoV. (2012). Sustentabilidad y Psicología Positiva. Una Visión Positiva de las Conductas Proambientales y Prosociales. Distrito Federal, México: El Manual Moderno.
7.
Corral-VerdugoV.BechtelR. B.Fraijo-SingB. (2003). Environmental beliefs and water conservation: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 247–257. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00086-5
8.
Corral-VerdugoV.Frías-ArmentaM.Pérez-UríasF.Orduña-CabreraV.Espinoza-GallegoN. (2002). Residential water consumption, motivation for conserving water and the continuing tragedy of the commons. Environmental Management, 30, 527–535. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2599-5
9.
Corral-VerdugoV.Mireles-AcostaJ.Tapia-FonllemC.Fraijo-SingB. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altrusitic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 18, 95–104.
10.
Corral-VerdugoV.Tapia-FonllemC.Ortiz-ValdezA. (2015). On the relationship between character strengths and sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47, 877–901. doi:10.1177/0013916514530718
11.
De OliverM. (1999). Attitudes and inaction: A case study of the manifest demographics of urban water conservation. Environment and Behavior, 31, 372–394. doi:10.1177/00139169921972155
12.
DiekmannA.PreisendörferP. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472. doi:10.1177/1043463103154002
13.
FredricksonB.CohnM. (2008). Positive emotions. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ.FeldmanL. (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 777–796). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
Green-DemersI.PelletierL.MénardS. (1997). The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 29, 157–166. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.29.3.157
15.
GuerreroM. (2006). El Agua (Quinta Edición). Distrito Federal, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, Secretaría de Educación Pública, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología.
16.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
HutaV. (2013a). Pursuing Eudaimonia versus Hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In WatermanA. S. (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 139–158). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
HutaV. (2013b). Eudaimonia. In DavidS.BoniwellI.AyersA. C. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 201–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
HutaV.PelletierL. G.BaxterD.ThompsonA. (2012). How eudaimonic and hedonic motives relate to the well-being of close others. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 399–404. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.705318
20.
KaiserF.SchultzP. W.BerenguerJ.Corral-VerdugoV.TankhaG. (2008). Extending planned environmentalism. Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures. European Psychologist, 13, 288–297. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.288
21.
KasserT.RyanR. (1993). A dark side of the american dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422.
22.
McCulloughM.EmmonsR.TsangJ. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127.
23.
NaitoT.MatsudaT.IntasuwanP.ChuawanleeW.ThanachananS.OunthitiwatJ.FukushimaM. (2010). Gratitude for, and regret toward, nature: Relationships of environmental intent of university students from Japan. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 993–1008.
24.
PetersonC.ParkN.SeligmanM. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.
25.
RyffC. D.SingerB. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.
26.
SadallaE.BerlinA.NeelR.LedlowS. (2014). Priorities in residential water use: A trade-off analysis. Environment and Behavior, 46, 303–328.
27.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514).
28.
StegL.PerlaviciuteG.van der WerffE.LurvinkJ. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46, 163–192.
29.
SymeG. J.PorterN. B.GoeftU.KingtonE. A. (2008). Integrating social well being into assessments of water policy: Meeting the challenge for decision makers. Water Policy, 10, 323–343.
30.
TsangJ.CarpenterT.RobertsJ.FrischM.CarlisleR. (2014). Why are materialists less happy? The role of gratitude and need satisfaction in the relationship between materialism and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 62–66.
31.
Vanegas-RicoM. C.Corral-VerdugoV. (2015). La percepción del costo conductual en el comportamiento proambiental. Memorias del XXIII Congreso Mexicano de Psicología. (pp. 1616–1617). Ciudad de México: Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología, A. C. Colegio Mexicano de Profesionistas de la Psicología, A. C.
32.
VerhallenT. M. M.PietersR. (1984). Attitude theory and behavioral costs. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5, 223–249.
33.
VittersøJ.SøholtY.HetlandI.ThoresenI. A.RøysambE. (2010). Was Hercules happy? Some answers from a functional model of human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95, 1–18.
34.
WatermanA. S.SchwartzS.ContiR. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.
35.
World Water Assessment Programme. (2012). The United Nations world water development report 4: Managing water under uncertainty and risk. Paris: UNESCO.
