Restoration in urban settings: pilot adaptation and psychometric properties of two psychological restoration and place bonding scales / Restauración en contextos urbanos: adaptación piloto y propiedades psicométricas de dos escalas de restauración psicológica y vinculación con el espacio
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2017
Restoration in urban settings: pilot adaptation and psychometric properties of two psychological restoration and place bonding scales / Restauración en contextos urbanos: adaptación piloto y propiedades psicométricas de dos escalas de restauración psicológica y vinculación con el espacio
Over the past few decades, a significant volume of research has been dedicated to the study of psychological restoration within and outside the field of Environmental Psychology. Following a period during which this research focused on gathering evidence in favour of the restorative potential of nature, the notion of restoration in urban settings is beginning to emerge as a new area of interest, with implications for the improvement of urban quality of life. This article presents an adaptation of two scales to be used in specific urban settings (squares, streets or boulevards), which could be valuable to the scientific community to this end: the Restoration Outcome Scale and the Attachment and Identification Scale. An online survey was conducted with 170 subjects. The adapted versions of these instruments obtained adequate reliability indices, and the results also indicate that these scales show convergent validity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BertoR. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249–259. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
2.
BowlerD. E.Buyung-AliL. M.KnightT. M.PullinA. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10, 456. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
3.
BratmanG. N.HamiltonJ. P.DailyG. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118–136. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
4.
CasakinH.HernándezB.RuizC. (2015, September). Place attachment and place identity in Israeli cities: The influence of city size. Cities, 42, 224–230. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.07.007
5.
ChangC.ChenP.HammittW. E.MachnikL. (2007). Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of wilderness environments attention restoration theory. In WatsonA.SporullJ.DeanL. (Eds.), Science and Stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium (pp. 479–484). Anchorage, AK: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service & Rocky Mountain Research Station.
6.
ChangC.-Y.HammittW. E.ChenP.-K.MachnikL.SuW.-C.. (2008). Psychophysiological responses and restorative values of natural environments in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 79–84. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.010
7.
GidlowC. J.JonesM. V.HurstG. L.MastersonD.Clark-CarterD.TarvainenM. P.NieuwenhuijsenM. J. (2016). Where to put your best foot forward: A randomised crossover trial of psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.003
8.
HartigT.EvansG. W.JamnerL. D.DavisD. S.GärlingT. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109–123. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
9.
HartigT.MitchellR.de VriesS.FrumkinH. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
10.
HernándezB.HidalgoM. C. (2005). Effect of urban vegetation on psychological restorativeness. Psychological Reports, 96, 1025–1028.
11.
HernándezB.HidalgoM. C.Salazar-LaplaceM. E.HessS. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
12.
HernándezB.MartínA. M.RuizC.HidalgoM. D. C. (2010). The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 281–288. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.009
13.
HerzogT. R.BlackA. M.FountaineK. A.KnottsD. J. (1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 165–170. doi:10.1006/jevp.1997.0051
14.
HerzogT. R.MaguireC. P.NebelM. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159–170. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5
15.
HidalgoM. C.BertoR.GalindoM. P.GetreviA. (2006). Identifying attractive and unattractive urban places: Categories, restorativeness and aesthetic attributes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 7, 115–133.
16.
HidalgoM. C.HernándezB. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
17.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature. A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
19.
KorpelaK.HartigT. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 221–233. doi:10.1006/jevp.1996.0018
20.
KorpelaK. M.YlénM.TyrväinenL.SilvennoinenH. (2008). Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health & Place, 14, 636–652. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.008
21.
KorpelaK. M.YlénM.TyrväinenL.SilvennoinenH. (2010). Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promotion International, 25, 200–209. doi:10.1093/heapro/daq007
22.
KotrlikJ. W.WilliamsH. A. (2003). The incorporation of effect size in information technology, learning, and performance research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21(1), 1–7.
23.
LewickaM. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 35–51. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.004
24.
LewickaM. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
25.
LorenzoE.CorralizaJ. A.ColladoS.SevillanoV. (2016). Preferencia, restauración y calidad ambiental percibida en plazas urbanas. Psyecology, 7, 164–177. doi:10.1080/21711976.2016.1149985
26.
LowS.AltmanI. (1992). Place Attatchment: A conceptual inquiry. In AltmanI.LowS. (Eds.), Place attachtment (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
27.
MadginR.BradleyL.HastingsA. (2016). Connecting physical and social dimensions of place attachment: What can we learn from attachment to urban recreational spaces?Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31, 677–693. doi:10.1007/s10901-016-9495-4
28.
MainK. (2013). Planting roots in foreign soil? - Immigrant place meanings in an urban park. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 291–304. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.003
29.
ParkB. J.TsunetsuguY.KasetaniT.KagawaT.MiyazakiY. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15, 18–26. doi:10.1007/s12199-009-0086-9
30.
RuizC.HernándezB.HidalgoM. C. (2011). Confirmación de la estructura factorial de una escala de apego e identidad con el barrio. Psyecology, 2, 157–165. doi:10.1174/217119711795712586
31.
RuizC.PérezC.HernándezB. (2013). Apego al lugar, restauración percibida y calidad de vida: Un modelo de relación. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 315–321. doi:10.1174/021093913808349271
32.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
33.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2014). Comparing the theories of interpersonal and place attachment. In ManzoL. C.Devine-WrightP. (Eds.), Place attachment. Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. 23–36). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
34.
SeamonD. (2014). Place attachment and phenomenology: The synergistic dynamism of place. In ManzoL.Devine-WrightP. (Eds.), Place attachment. Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. 11–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
StaatsH.JahnckeH.HerzogT. R.HartigT. (2016). Urban options for psychological restoration: Common strategies in everyday situations. Plos One, 11, 1–24. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146213
36.
TakayamaN.KorpelaK.LeeJ.MorikawaT.TsunetsuguY.ParkB. J.KagawaT. (2014). Emotional, restorative and vitalizing effects of forest and urban environments at four sites in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 7207–7230. doi:10.3390/ijerph110707207
37.
TrochimW. (2000). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.
38.
TroffaR.FornaraF. (2011). The relationship between restorative components and environmental preference in natural and built leisure environments. In Fernández-RamírezB.HidalgoM. D. C.SalvadorC. M.MartosM. C. (Eds.), Espacios urbanos y sostenibilidad: Claves para la ciencia y la gestión ambiental. Libro de actas del XI Congreso de Psicología Ambiental (pp. 231–237). Almería: Universidad de Almería.
39.
TsunetsuguY.LeeJ.ParkB.-J.-J.TyrväinenL.KagawaT.MiyazakiY. (2013). Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 90–93. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.014
40.
TyrväinenL.OjalaA.KorpelaK.LankiT.TsunetsuguY.KagawaT. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005
41.
ValeraS. (1996). Análisis de los aspectos simbólicos del espacio urbano. Perspectivas desde la psicología ambiental. Revista de Psicología Universitas Tarraconensis, 18(1), 63–84.
42.
ValeraS. (2014). La identidad social urbana como instrumento para mejorar el bienestar humano. In SanchezD.DomínguezL. A. (Eds.), Identidad y Espacio Público. Apliando ámbitos y prácticas (pp. 97–120). Nuevo León, Mexico: Gedisa.
43.
ValeraS.PolE. (1994). El concepto de identidad social urbana: Una aproximación entre la psicología social y la psicología ambiental. Anuario de Psicología, 52, 5–24.
44.
WynveenC. J.KyleG. T.SuttonS. G. (2012). Natural area visitors’ place meaning and place attachment ascribed to a marine setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 287–296. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.001
