Talking in defence of species conservation: the role of laws and community norms conflicts across stages of a communicative action / La defensa de la conservación de las especies: el papel de los conflictos entre las leyes y las normas de la comunidad en diversas etapas de una acción comunicativa

Abstract

Spanish

New laws promoting species conservation in protected sites are often contested by local communities. Conflicts between the laws and community norms may explain this; yet the literature on normative conflicts has still not examined such laws-norms conflicts. It has moreover been inconclusive regarding the (negative or positive) relationship between normative conflicts and action, and has not studied how they affect engagement in communicative actions supporting the laws. A stage model (Trans-Theoretical Model) was used to clarify how two types of conflicts — between the law and community descriptive and injunctive norms, and between the latter two — are associated with transitions from awareness to engagement in communicative action. A survey of 342 residents in Portuguese Natura 2000 sites showed stronger normative conflicts at pre-action (versus post-action) stages. Additionally, conflict between injunctive and descriptive community norms is lower and more invariant across stages than conflict between them and the law, suggesting a higher relevance of the later for (dis)engagement in communicative action. We discuss the contributions a stage perspective may offer for improving the implementation of conservation laws.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armitage

C. J.

(2009). Is there utility in the transtheoretical model? British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 195–210. doi:10.1348/135910708X368991

Armitage

C. J.

Povey

Arden

M. A.

(2003). Evidence for discontinuity patterns across the stages of change: A role for attitudinal ambivalence. Psychology & Health, 18, 373–386. doi:10.1080/0887044031000066553

Bertoldo

Castro

(2016). The outer influence inside us: Exploring the relation between social and personal norms. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 112, 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.020

Castro

(2012). Legal innovation for social change: Exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Political Psychology, 33, 105–121. doi:10.1111/pops.2012.33.issue-1

Castro

Mouro

Gouveia

(2012). The conservation of biodiversity in protected areas: Comparing the presentation of legal innovations in the national and the regional press. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 539–555. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.606459

Cialdini

R. B.

Reno

R. R.

Kallgren

C. A.

(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015

Elcheroth

Doise

Reicher

(2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32, 729–758. doi:10.1111/pops.2011.32.issue-5

Forward

S. E.

(2014). Exploring people’s willingness to bike using a combination of the theory of planned behavioural and the transtheoretical model. European Review of Applied Psychology, 64, 151–159. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2014.04.002

McDonald

R. I.

Fielding

K. S.

Louis

W. R.

(2014a). Conflicting norms highlight the need for action. Environment and Behavior, 46, 139–162. doi:10.1177/0013916512453992

10.

McDonald

R. I.

Fielding

K. S.

Louis

W. R.

(2014b). Conflicting social norms and community conservation compliance. Journal for Nature Conservation, 22, 212–216. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2013.11.005

11.

Moscovici

(1972). Theory and society in social psychology. In Israel

Tajfel

(Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 17–68). London: Academic Press.

12.

Moscovici

(1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992

13.

Mouro

Castro

(2016). Self–other relations in biodiversity conservation in the community: Representational processes and adjustment to new actions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26, 340–353. doi:10.1002/casp.v26.4

14.

Prochaska

J. O.

DiClemente

C. C.

(1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 51, 390–395. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390

15.

Smith

J. R.

Louis

W. R.

(2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 647–666. doi:10.1348/014466607X269748

16.

Smith

L. G.

Thomas

E. F.

McGarty

(2015). “We must be the change we want to see in the world”: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology, 36, 543–557. doi:10.1111/pops.12180

17.

Tankard

M. E.

Paluck

E. L.

(2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues & Policy Review, 10, 181–211. doi:10.1111/sipr.2016.10.issue-1