The influence of greenfluencer credibility on green purchase behaviour ( Influencia de la credibilidad del greenfluencer en el comportamiento de compra de productos verdes )
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2023
The influence of greenfluencer credibility on green purchase behaviour ( Influencia de la credibilidad del greenfluencer en el comportamiento de compra de productos verdes )
The communication of environmental awareness through social media can act as a mechanism for adopting more responsible consumption patterns. Therefore, the aim of this research was to analyse the impact of greenfluencer credibility on attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control, as well as the effect these have on purchase intentions and of the latter on green purchase behaviours. Quantitative, non-experimental, explanatory, cross-sectional research was conducted on 201 Mexican subjects between the ages of 15 and 60, all followers of environmental influencers on Facebook. The results shows that the credibility of greenfluencers had a positive effect on attitude, subjective norms and behavioural control. In addition, both attitude and perceived behavioural control positively impacted purchase intentions, although subjective norms did not. Finally, purchase intentions had a significant effect on the actual purchase of green products. Further exploration would be useful on the role of greenfluencers in the adoption of sustainable lifestyles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.
AjzenI. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
3.
AjzenI. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Open University Press.
4.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
5.
BaumgartnerH.WeijtersB.PietersR. (2021). The biasing effect of common method variance: Some clarifications. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00766-8
6.
BeckerA.WaldnerC. J.NitschL. J.TrautweinS. (2022). Communicating social value: An experimental study on credible communication and social enterprises. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1–23. in press. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21529
7.
CarterD. (2016). Hustle and brand: The sociotechnical shaping of influence. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 2056305116666305. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116666305
8.
ChetiouiY.BenlafqihH.LebdaouiH. (2020). How fashion influencers contribute to consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 24(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2019-0157
9.
ChinW. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In EspositoV. V.ChinW.HenselerJ.WangH. (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and application (pp. 645–689). Springer.
10.
CooleyD.Parks-YancyR. (2019). The effect of social media on perceived information credibility and decision making. Journal of Internet Commerce, 18(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2019.1595362
11.
DagherG. K.ItaniO. (2014). Factors influencing green purchasing behaviour: Empirical evidence from the Lebanese consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1482
Do PaçoA. M. F.ReisR. (2012). Factors affecting skepticism toward green advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.10672463
14.
FullerC. M.SimmeringM. J.AtincG.AtincY.BabinB. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
15.
GrappeC. G.LombartC.LouisD.DurifF. (2022). Clean labeling: Is it about the presence of benefits or the absence of detriments? Consumer response to personal care claims. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102893
16.
HairJ. J.HowardM. C.NitzlC. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(March), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
17.
HairJ. F.JrHultG. T. M.RingleC.SarstedtM. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE.
18.
HairJ. F.RisherJ. J.SarstedtM.RingleC. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
19.
JinX. L.YinM.ZhouZ.YuX. (2021). The differential effects of trusting beliefs on social media users’ willingness to adopt and share health knowledge. Information Processing & Management, 58(1), 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102413
20.
KamalanonP.ChenJ. S.LeT. T. Y. (2022). “Why do we buy green products?” An extended theory of the planned behavior model for green product purchase behavior. Sustainability, 14(2), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020689
21.
KumarR.TripathiV. (2019). Green advertising: Examining the role of celebrity’s credibility using SEM approach. Global Business Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919862660
22.
LiuM. T.LiuY.MoZ. (2020). Moral norm is the key: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) on Chinese consumers’ green purchase intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(8), 1823–1841. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2019-0285
23.
LiuX.WangC.ShishimeT.FujitsukaT. (2012). Sustainable consumption: Green purchasing behaviours of urban residents in China. Sustainable Development, 20(4), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.484
24.
LouC.YuanS. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
25.
MadduxJ. E.RogersR. W. (1980). Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.235
26.
Martín-ConsuegraD.FaraoniM.DíazE.RanfagniS. (2018). Exploring relationships among brand credibility, purchase intention and social media for fashion brands: A conditional mediation model. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 9(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2018.1461020
27.
MazharW.JaleesT.AsimM.AlamS. H.ZamanS. I. (2022). Psychological consumer behavior and sustainable green food purchase. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol & No. ahead, Vol & No. aheadofprint. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2021-0317
MoserK.TumasjanA.WelpeI. M. (2015). Small, but attractive: The effect of employer branding and legitimacy on startup attractiveness. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 10528. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.105
30.
OhanianR. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
31.
ParkH. J.LinL. M. (2020). Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025
32.
PhamM.DangT. Y.HoangT. H. Y.TranT. T. N.NgoT. H. Q. (2021). The effects of online social influencers on purchasing behavior of generation z: An empirical study in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(11), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021
33.
PittmanM.AbellA. (2021). More trust in fewer followers: Diverging effects of popularity metrics and green orientation social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56, 70–82. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.05.002
34.
RamayahT.LeeJ. W. C.MohamadO. (2010). Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.007
35.
RiskosK.DekoulouP.MylonasN.TsourvakasG. (2021). Ecolabels and the Attitude–behavior relationship towards green product purchase: A multiple mediation model. Sustainability, 13(12), 6867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126867
36.
RitterA. M.BorchardtM.VaccaroG. L.PereiraG. M.AlmeidaF. (2015). Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: Exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.066
37.
RogersE. M.BhowmikD. K. (1970). Homophily-Heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Oxford Journals, Social Sciences, Public Opinion, Quarterly, 34(4), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/267838
38.
SailerA.WilfingH.StrausE. (2022). Greenwashing and Bluewashing in Black Friday-Related Sustainable Fashion Marketing on Instagram. Sustainability, 14(3), 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031494
39.
SarstedtM.RingleC. M.SmithD.ReamsR.HairJ. F.Jr. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
40.
SreenN.PurbeyS.SadaranganiP. (2020). Understanding the relationship between different facets of materialism and attitude toward green products. Journal of Global Marketing, 33(5), 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1751370
41.
SunY.WangS. (2019). Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase green products in the social media marketing context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(4), 860–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0178
42.
TehseenS.RamayahT.SajilanS. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
43.
WangB.LiJ.SunA.WangY.WuD. (2019). Residents’ green purchasing intentions in a developing-country context: Integrating PLS-SEM and MGA methods. Sustainability, 12(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010030
44.
WesleyS. C.LeeM. Y.KimE. Y. (2012). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness and motivational attitude on socially responsible purchasing behavior in South Korea. Journal of Global Marketing, 25(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2012.697383
45.
XuX.HuaY.WangS.XuG. (2020). Determinants of consumer’s intention to purchase authentic green furniture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104721
46.
YangX.ChenL.WeiL.SuQ. (2020). Personal and media factors related to citizens’ pro-environmental behavioral intention against haze in China: A moderating analysis of TPB. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072314
47.
ZahanI.ChuanminS.FayyazM.HafeezM. (2020). Green purchase behavior towards green housing: An investigation of Bangladeshi consumers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(31), 38745–38757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09926-3
