To Forget or Not to Forget: The Effect of Probability of Test on Directed Forgetting

Abstract

Two experiments investigated how individuals use explicit memory cues that designate different probabilities of test. As in typical directed forgetting studies, subjects received words explicitly cued as having either a 0% or a 100% chance of being on a subsequent memory test (i.e. forget and remember cues, respectively). In addition, some words were explicitly cued as having the potential to be either forgotten or remembered (i.e. a 50% cue). Recall of 50% words was between that of 0% and 100% words. In addition, the presence of 50% words lowered recall of the 100% words compared to that of a control group that did not receive the 50% words, but received the same number of 100% words. A think-aloud task indicated that these results were due to the 50% words being treated like either 100% or 0%words at encoding. The results are discussed in terms of the effect of different probabilities of test on the strategic processing and representation of information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Basden

B. H.

Basden

D. R.

Gargano

G. J.

(1993). Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19, 603–616.

Bjork

R. A.

(1970). Positive forgetting: The noninterference of items intentionally forgotten. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9, 255–268.

Bjork

R. A.

(1972). Theoretical implications of directed forgetting. Coding processes in human memory. Melton

A. W.

Martin

Washington, DC: Winston 217–235.

Bjork

R. A.

(1989). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving. Roediger

H. L.

Craik

F. I. M.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 309–330.

Ericsson

K. A.

Simon

H. A.

(1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 87, 215–251.

Geiselman

R. E.

(1977). Memory for prose as a function of learning strategy and inspection time. Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 547–555.

Geiselman

R. E.

Bjork

R. A.

Fishman

D. L.

(1983). Disrupted retrieval in directed forgetting: A link with posthypnotic amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112, 58–72.

James

(1890/1950). The principles of psychology New York: Dover.

Johnson

H. M.

(1994). Processes of successful intentional forgetting. Psychological Bulletin 116, 274–292.

10.

Kucera

Francis

W. N.

(1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

11.

MacLeod

C. M.

(1989). Directed forgetting affects both explicit and implicit tests of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 13–21.

12.

Paller

K. A.

(1990). Recall and stem-completion priming have different electrophysical correlates and are modified differentially by directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16, 1021–1032.

13.

Roper

K. L.

Zentall

T. R.

(1993). Directed forgetting in animals. Psychological Bulletin 113, 513–532.

14.

Roper

K.L.

, & Zentall

T.R.

(1994). Directed forgetting in pigeons: The role of delay interval keypecking on delayed matching accuracy.Learning and Motivation, 25, 26–44.

15.

Rundus

, & Atkinson

R.C.

(1970). Rehearsal processes in free recall: A procedure for directed observation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 99–105.