The present study examines mechanisms of endogenous covert spatial orienting in audition as revealed by event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and reaction times (RTs). In one experimental condition, subjects were instructed to respond to any target tone irrespective of whether it was presented in a valid (spatially predictive cue), neutral (uninformative cue), or invalid (misleading cue) trial. In another experimental condition, only target tones presented at a cued position required a response—that is, subjects could completely ignore tones presented at the uncued ear. Cue validity had an effect on RT, which consisted in benefits for valid trials and in costs for invalid trials relative to the RTs in neutral trials. There were also distinct ERP effects of cue validity in the 100–300 msec time range. These ERP effects were enlarged in the condition in which uncued tones could be ignored. The effects of cue validity on RTs and ERPs demonstrated covert orienting in audition both for stimuli requiring an overt response and also for stimuli that did not require a behavioural response. It is argued that this attentional selection is located at intermediate stages of information processing, rather than at peripheral stages such as basic sensory-specific processing or response selection.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlhoK.DonauerN.PaavilainenP.ReinikainenK.SamsM.NäätänenR. (1987). Stimulus selection during auditory spatial attention as expressed by event-related potentials.Biological Psychology24, 153–162.
2.
AlhoK.LavikainenJ.ReinikainenK.SamsM.NäätänenR. (1990). Event-related brain potentials in selective listening to frequent and rare stimuli.Psychophysiology27, 73–86.
3.
AllportA. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years.Attention and performance 14.MeyerD. E.KornblumS.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press183–218.
4.
BédardM. A.El MassiouiF.PillonB.NandrinoJ. L. (1993). Time for reorienting of attention: A premotor hypothesis of the underlying mechanism.Neuropsychologia31, 241–249.
5.
BroadbentD. E. (1958). Perception and communicationNew York: Pergamon Press.
6.
CherryE. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America25, 975–979.
7.
DonaldM. W.YoungM. J. (1982). A time course analysis of attentional tuning of the auditory evoked response.Experimental Brain Research46, 357–367.
8.
EimerM. (1993). Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: An ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology88, 408–420.
9.
EimerM. (1994a). An ERP study on visual-spatial priming with peripheral onsets.Psychophysiology31, 154–163.
10.
EimerM. (1994b). “Sensory gating” as a mechanism for visuo-spatial orienting: Electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cueing experiments.Perception & Psychophysics55, 667–675.
11.
EimerM. (1995). ERP correlates of transient attention shifts to color and location.Biological Psychology41, 167–182.
12.
EimerM. (1996). ERP modulations indicate the selective processing of visual stimuli as a result of transient and sustained spatial attention.Psychophysiology33, 13–21.
13.
FarahM. J.WongA. B.MonheitM. A.MorrowL. A. (1989). Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal?.Neuropsychologia27, 461–470.
14.
GiardM. H.PerrinF.PernierJ.PeronnetF. (1988). Several attention-related wave forms in auditory areas: A topographic study.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology69, 371–384.
15.
GopherD. (1973). Eye-movement pattern in selective listening tasks of focused attention.Perception & Psychophysics14, 259–264.
16.
HansenJ. C.HillyardS. A. (1984). Effects of stimulation rate and attribute cuing on event-related potentials during selective auditory attention.Psychophysiology21, 394–405.
17.
HansenJ. C.HillyardS. A. (1988). Temporal dynamics of human auditory selective attention.Psychophysiology25, 316–329.
18.
HarterM. R.MillerS. L.PriceN. J.LaLondeM. E.KeyesA. L. (1989). Neural processes involved in directing attention.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience1, 223–237.
19.
HillyardS. A.HansenJ. C. (1986). Attention: electrophysiological approaches.Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications.ColesM. G. H.DonchinE.PorgesS. W.227–243.
20.
HugdahlK.NordbyH. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities.Behavioral and Neural Biology62, 21–32.
21.
JayM. F.SparksD. L. (1984). Auditory receptive fields in primate superior colliculus shift with changes in eye position.Nature309, 345–347.
22.
LewaldJ.EhrensteinW. H. (1996). The effect of eye-position on auditory lateralization.Experimental Brain Research108, 473–485.
23.
MangunG. R.HillyardS. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance17, 1057–1074.
24.
MazzucchiA.CattelaniR.UmiltàC. (1983). Hemispheric prevalence in acoustical attention.Brain and Cognition2, 1–11.
25.
MillerJ. (1991). Reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: Bias varies with sample size.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology43A, 907–912.
26.
MondorT. A.ZatorreR. J. (1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 387–409.
27.
MountcastleV. B. (1978). Brain mechanisms for directed attention.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine71, 14–21.
28.
MüllerH. J.RabbitP. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15, 315–330.
29.
MurrayJ.AllardF.BrydenM. P. (1988). Expectancy effects: Cost-benefit analysis of monaurally and dichotically presented speech.Brain and Language35, 105–118.
30.
NäätänenR. (1982). Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection of selective attention.Psychological Bulletin92, 605–640.
31.
NäätänenR. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function.Behavioral and Brain Sciences13, 201–288.
32.
NäätänenR. (1992). Attention and brain functionHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33.
OkitaT.WeiJ. (1993). Effects of eye position on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention.Psychophysiology30, 359–365.
34.
PosnerM. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mindNew York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35.
PosnerM. I.PetersenS. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain.Annual Review of Neuroscience13, 25–42.
36.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R.DavidsonB. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General109, 160–174.
37.
QuinlanP. T.BaileyP. J. (1995). An examination of attentional control in the auditory modality: Further evidence for auditory orienting.Perception & Psychophysics57, 614–628.
38.
RhodesG. (1987). Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information.Perception and Psychophysics42, 1–14.
39.
RobinD. A.RizzoM. (1992). Orienting attention in audition and between audition and vision: young and elderly subjects.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research35, 701–707.
40.
RupplA. (1993). Räumlich-visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und sa kka dische Augenbewegungen, [Visual spatial attention and saccadic eye movements]Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Unpublished Diplom Thesis.
41.
ScharfB.QuigleyS.AokiC.PeacheyN.ReevesA. (1987). Focused auditory attention and frequency selectivity.Perception and Psychophysics42, 215–223.
42.
SchrögerE. (1993). Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli succeeding transient shifts of spatial attention in a Go/Nogo task.Biological Psychology36, 183–207.
43.
SchrögerE. (1994). Human brain potential signs of selection by location and frequency in an auditory transient attention situation.Neuroscience Letters173, 163–166.
44.
SchrögerE.EimerM. (1993). Effects of transient spatial attention on auditory event-related potentials.NeuroReport4, 588–590.
45.
SchrögerE.WolffCh.TschakertR.SchuböA.Involuntary attentional capture versus voluntary attentional orienting in audition.Mapping cognition in time and space: Combining EEG, MEG with functional imaging.HeinzeH. J.MünteT. F.MangunG. R.in press.
46.
SpenceC. J.DriverJ. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 555–574.
47.
SpenceC. J.DriverJ. (1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 1005–1030.
48.
SpenceC. J.DriverJ. (1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial attention.Perception and Psychophysics59, 1–22.
49.
SteinB. E.MeredithM. A. (1993). The merging of the sensesCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
UlrichR.MillerJ. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology General123, 34–80.
51.
WoodsD. L. (1990). The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies.Event-related potentials: Basic Issues and Applications.RohrbaughJ. W.ParasuramanR.JohnsonR.Jr.Oxford: Oxford University Press178–209.
